The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    One popular way of construing silence as a speech act is to appeal to Grice’s account of implicature. It’s worth noting, however, that Grice explicitly rejects this move (see Grice, 1957).

References

  1. Acheson, K. (2008). Silence as gesture: Rethinking the nature of communicative silences. Communication Theory, 18, 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, D. (2001). Sounding silence: In Kafka’s ‘In the Penal Colony’. Modernism/Modernity, 8(2), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asenbaum, H. (2018). Anonymity and democracy: Absence as presence in the public sphere. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, W. (1996). In the 'folds of our own discourse': The pleasures and freedoms of silence. The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 3(1), 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Camus, A. (2004). The Silent Men. The plague, the fall, exile and the kingdom, and selected essays (translated by J. O’Brien). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corbin, A. (2016). Histoire du silence: De la Renaissance à nos jours. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferguson, K. (2003). Silence: A politics. Contemporary Political Theory, 2(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiumara, G. C. (1990). The other side of language: A philosophy of listening. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freeden, M. (2015). Silence in political theory: A conceptual predicament. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gest, J., & Gray, S. W. D. (Eds.). (2015). Silent citizenship: The politics of marginality in unequal democracies. Citizenship studies, special issue (Vol. 19(5)). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gray, S.W.D. (2015). Mapping silent citizenship: How democratic theory hears citizens’ silence and why it matters. Citizenship Studies, 19(5), 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatzisavvidou, S. (2015). Disturbing binaries in political thought: Silence as political activism. Social Movement Studies, 14(5), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jung, T. (2018). Schweigen. In D. Morat & H. Ziemer (Eds.), Handbuch Sound. Geschichte – Begriffe – Ansätze (pp. 414–418). Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jungkunz, V. (2012). The promise of democratic silences. New Political Science, 34(2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kant, I. (1997). In P. Health & J. B. Schneewind (Eds.), Lectures on ethics (translated by P. Heath). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kenny, C. (2011). The power of silence: Silent communication in daily life. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khatchadourian, H. (2015). How to do things with silence. Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krause, S. (2015). Freedom beyond sovereignty. Reconstructing liberal individualism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kuran, T. (1995). Private truth, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4), 293–330.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Langton, R. (2007). Disenfranchised silence. In G. Brennan, et al. (Eds.), Common minds: Themes from the philosophy of Philip Pettit. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer, H. (2007). Schweigen. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik (Vol. 8, pp. 686–706). Niemeyer: Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Muers, R. (2004). Keeping god’s silence: Towards a theological ethics of communication. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nagel, T. (2002). Concealment and exposure. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz, P. (2013). Revealing power: Masked protest and the blank figure. Cultural Politics, 9(3), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saldaña-Portillo, M. J. (2003). The revolutionary imagination in the Americas and the age of development. Durham: Duke.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Scott, S. (2017). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology, 52(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wagner, R. (2012). Silence as resistance before the subject, or could the subaltern remain silent? Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The workshop from which this exchange originated was funded by the British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship “The Politics of Silence.”

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Jung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brito Vieira, M., Jung, T., Gray, S.W.D. et al. The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities. Contemp Polit Theory 18, 424–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2

Download citation