Skip to main content
Log in

The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities

  • Critical Exchange
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. One popular way of construing silence as a speech act is to appeal to Grice’s account of implicature. It’s worth noting, however, that Grice explicitly rejects this move (see Grice, 1957).

References

  • Acheson, K. (2008). Silence as gesture: Rethinking the nature of communicative silences. Communication Theory, 18, 535–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (2001). Sounding silence: In Kafka’s ‘In the Penal Colony’. Modernism/Modernity, 8(2), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asenbaum, H. (2018). Anonymity and democracy: Absence as presence in the public sphere. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (1996). In the 'folds of our own discourse': The pleasures and freedoms of silence. The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, 3(1), 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2004). The Silent Men. The plague, the fall, exile and the kingdom, and selected essays (translated by J. O’Brien). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, A. (2016). Histoire du silence: De la Renaissance à nos jours. Paris: Albin Michel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. (2003). Silence: A politics. Contemporary Political Theory, 2(1), 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiumara, G. C. (1990). The other side of language: A philosophy of listening. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (2015). Silence in political theory: A conceptual predicament. Journal of Political Ideologies, 20(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gest, J., & Gray, S. W. D. (Eds.). (2015). Silent citizenship: The politics of marginality in unequal democracies. Citizenship studies, special issue (Vol. 19(5)). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, S.W.D. (2015). Mapping silent citizenship: How democratic theory hears citizens’ silence and why it matters. Citizenship Studies, 19(5), 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzisavvidou, S. (2015). Disturbing binaries in political thought: Silence as political activism. Social Movement Studies, 14(5), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, A. (1993). The power of silence: Social and pragmatic perspectives. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, T. (2018). Schweigen. In D. Morat & H. Ziemer (Eds.), Handbuch Sound. Geschichte – Begriffe – Ansätze (pp. 414–418). Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jungkunz, V. (2012). The promise of democratic silences. New Political Science, 34(2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1997). In P. Health & J. B. Schneewind (Eds.), Lectures on ethics (translated by P. Heath). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, C. (2011). The power of silence: Silent communication in daily life. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatchadourian, H. (2015). How to do things with silence. Boston: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S. (2015). Freedom beyond sovereignty. Reconstructing liberal individualism. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1995). Private truth, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4), 293–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, R. (2007). Disenfranchised silence. In G. Brennan, et al. (Eds.), Common minds: Themes from the philosophy of Philip Pettit. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism: Philosophical essays on pornography and objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. (2007). Schweigen. In G. Ueding (Ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik (Vol. 8, pp. 686–706). Niemeyer: Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muers, R. (2004). Keeping god’s silence: Towards a theological ethics of communication. Malden: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2002). Concealment and exposure. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, P. (2013). Revealing power: Masked protest and the blank figure. Cultural Politics, 9(3), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña-Portillo, M. J. (2003). The revolutionary imagination in the Americas and the age of development. Durham: Duke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (2017). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology, 52(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. (2012). Silence as resistance before the subject, or could the subaltern remain silent? Theory, Culture & Society, 29(6), 99–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The workshop from which this exchange originated was funded by the British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship “The Politics of Silence.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theo Jung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brito Vieira, M., Jung, T., Gray, S.W.D. et al. The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities. Contemp Polit Theory 18, 424–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2

Navigation