Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Post-sovereign power and leadership

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

Power and leadership are typically theorized as exercises of sovereignty in the western tradition of thought. This essay takes up Michel Foucault’s challenge to escape the ‘spell of monarchy’ in our thinking in order to move beyond sovereign models of power. Interdisciplinary scholarship on complex adaptive systems provides fertile ground for this endeavor, illustrating the dynamics of post-sovereign power and opportunities for post-sovereign leadership. Viewing human organizations as complex adaptive systems helps us to theorize leadership without over-simplifying its nature or exaggerating its potential. It also undermines the prevailing identification of sovereign power as the only antidote for anarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnew, J. (2009) Globalization and Sovereignty. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. (2009) Complexity in Socio-economic Systems. In: L. Douglas Kiel (ed.) Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity (Vol. 2, pp. 118–137). Oxford: Eolss Publishers//UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1999) Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science 10(3): 216–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1965) On Revolution. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1968) Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1978) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D., Marschke, M. and Plummer, R. (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change 18(1): 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, K. (2007) Foucault, complexity and myth. In: K. Richardson and P. Cilliers (eds.) Explorations in Complexity Thinking (pp. 1–13). Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrent, M.C. (2016) Liberalism without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-Market Creed, 1976–1979. In: D. Zamora and M. Behrent (eds.) Foucault and Neoliberalism (pp. 24–62). Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1959) Leadership theory and administrative behavior: The problem of Authority. Administrative Science Quarterly 4: 259–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J. and C. Folke (eds.) (2003) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bodin, J. (1992) On Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (1996) Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2006) Deliberative democracy and the epistemic benefits of diversity. Episteme 3(03): 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, B. (1899) The Philosophical Theory of the State. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brafman, O. and Pollack, J. (2013) The Chaos Imperative: How Chance and Disruption Increase Innovation, Effectiveness and Success. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2010) Walled States, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, J. and Falk, J. (1992) The End of Sovereignty? The Politics of a Shrinking and Fragmenting World. Hants, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, T., Meyer, A. and Hench, T. (2004) Organizational emergence. Organization Science 15: 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, J. (2014) On Sovereignty and Other Political Delusions. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (2004) The Complexity of Sovereignty. In: J. Edkins, V. Pin-Fat, and M. Shapiro (eds.) Sovereign Lives: Power in Global Politics. New York and London: Routledge:23-40.

  • Connolly, W. (2005) Pluralism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2013) Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1946) The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, E. (2009) Complexity, Politics and Public Policy. In: L. Douglas Kiel (ed.) Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity (Vol. 2, pp. 160–177). Oxford: Eolss Publishers/UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983) On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of Work in Progress. In: Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow (eds.) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991) Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003) ‘Society Must Be Defended’ Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. In: Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana (eds.). New York: Picador.

  • Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. In: Michel Senellart (ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79. In: M. Senellart (ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fraser, N. (1981) Foucault on modern power: Empirical insights and normative confusions. Praxis International 1: 2762–2787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., Peterson, G. and Holling, C.S. (2008) Practicing adaptive management in complex social-ecological systems. In: J. Norberg and G. Cumming (eds.) Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future (pp. 223–245). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1986) The genealogical writing of history: On some Aporias in Foucault’s theory of power. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 10: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Schultz, L., Folke, C. and Olsson, P. (2008) Social networks as sources of resilience in social-ecological systems. In: J. Norberg and G. Cumming (eds.) Complexity theory for a sustainable future (pp. 119–148). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2000) Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. and Negri, A. (2017) Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazy, J., Goldstein, J. and Lichtenstein, B. (2007) Complex systems leadership theory. In: J. Hazy, J. Goldstein and B. Lichtenstein (eds.) Complex Systems Leadership Theory: New Perspectives from Complexity Science on Social and Organizational Effectiveness (pp. 1–13). Litchfield Park, AZ: ISCE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R., Grashow, A. and Linsky, M. (2009) The Practice of Adaptive Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, N. (2017) Is The any Point to Protesting? New Yorker. August 21. Available from: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/21/is-there-any-point-to-protesting.

  • Hobbes, T. (1968) Leviathan. In: C.B. Macpherson (ed.). New York: Penguin.

  • Holland, J. (1995) Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1998) Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. (ed.) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. and Gunderson, L. (2002) Resilience and adaptive cycles. In: L. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds.) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 25–62). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S., Gunderson, L. and Peterson, G. (2002) Sustainability and panarchies. In: L. Gunderson and C.S. Holling (eds.) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (pp. 63–102). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, L. and Page, S. (2001) Problem solving by heterogenous agents. Journal of Economic Theory 97(1): 123–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, L. and Page, S. (2012) Some microfoundations of collective wisdom. In: H. Landemore and J. Elster (eds.) Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms (pp. 56–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, L., Page, S. and Baumol, W. (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(46): 16385–16389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1998) Democracy as reflexive cooperation: john dewey and the theory of democracy today. Political Theory 26(6): 763–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. (2004) The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press, accessed at http://common.books24x7.com/toc.aspx?bookid=11363.

  • Karkkainen, B. (2004) Post-sovereign environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 4(1): 72–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (2016) The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces that will Shape our Future. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiel, D.L. (1994) Managing Chaos and Complexity in Government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberson, P.J. and Scott, E. (2012) Optimal forecasting groups. Management Science 58(4): 805–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1994) Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, J. (2010) Digital Diplomacy. New York Times Magazine. July 16. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/magazine/18web2-0-t.html.

  • Luhmann, N. (2013) Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005) Power: A Radical View (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. and Coutu, D. (2006) The HBR interview: Ideas as art. Harvard Business Review 84(10): 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, R. and Uhl-Bien, M. (2001) Leadership in complex organizations. Leader-ship Quarterly 12: 389–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L.S., Soulé, M.E. and Doak, D.F. (1993) The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience 4: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (2009) Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morçöl, G. (2012) A Complexity Theory for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morovitz, H. (2002) The Emergence of Everything: How the World became Complex. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, J. and Cumming, G. (eds.) (2008) Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. (1999) Pragmatism, adaptive management, and sustainability. Environmental Values 8(4): 451–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober, J. (2010) Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober, Josiah. (2013) Democracy’s wisdom: An Aristotelian middle way for collective judgment. American Political Science Review 107(1): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olssen, M. (2008) Foucault as complexity theorist. In: M. Mason (ed.) Complexity Theory and the Philosophy of Education (pp. 91–111). UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010) Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review 100(3): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. (2011) Diversity and Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powman, D. and Duchon, D. (2007) Emergent leadership: getting beyond heroes and scapegoats. In: J. Hazy, J. Goldstein and B. Lichtenstein (eds.) Complex Systems Leadership Theory: New Perspectives from Complexity Science on Social and Organizational Effectiveness (pp. 109–127). Litchfield Park, AZ: ISCE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priban, J. (2013) The self-referential semantics of sovereignty: A systems theoretical response to (Post)sovereignty studies. Constellations 20: 406–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984) Order out of Chaos. New York: Bantham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R. (1990) Ecosystems, Populations and People. In: Emilio F. Moran (ed.) The Ecosystem Approach in Anthropology (pp. 41–72). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Revel, J. (2014) Identity, nature, life: three biopolitical deconstructions. In: V. Lemm and M. Vatter (eds.) The Government of Life: Foucault, Biopolitics, and Neoliberalism. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J., Czempiel, E. and Durfee, M. (2000) Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. (2016) The Industries of the Future. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1996) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, A. (2000) Power and responsibility: Should we spare the king’s head? Politics 20(3): 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmittt, C. (1985) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, L.P. (1990) The agony of politics: The Nietzschean roots of foucault’s thought. American Political Science Review 84: 907–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (1959) Democracy in America (Vol. I). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (2015) The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2017) Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1994) Max Weber. Political Writings. In: P. Lassman (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • West, G. (2017) Scale. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (1992) Leadership and the New Science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, A.W., Chabris, C F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N. and Malone, T. (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004): 686–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamora, D. and Behrent, M. (2016) Foucault and Neoliberalism. In: D. Zamora and M. Behrent (eds.) Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Leslie Paul Thiele

Authors
  1. Leslie Paul Thiele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie Paul Thiele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiele, L.P. Post-sovereign power and leadership. Contemp Polit Theory 18, 158–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0255-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0255-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation