Skip to main content
Log in

Interdependency: The fourth existential insult to humanity

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

Sigmund Freud famously described three existential insults to humanity stemming from heliocentrism, evolution, and psychoanalysis. In recent years we are, perhaps, beginning to see the emergence of a fourth: interdependency. Over the last several centuries, Anglo-American culture has modelled itself on a vision of the independent individual – strong, autonomous, and self-sufficient. Yet from feminist theory, communitarianism, disability theory, institutionalist economics, and elsewhere, the evidence mounts that independence is, in most contexts, a myth. We are, in fact, fundamentally social beings: fragile, vulnerable, variously disabled, and intrinsically dependent. In their time, each of the existential insults had profound effects; they forced a re-examination of the self, which rippled throughout the culture and uprooted old practices. This article argues that taking interdependency seriously would similarly lead to profound changes in our culture, our central political concepts, and even our major institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, K. (2011) Performing interdependence: Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor in the examined life. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 21(2): 72–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alperovitz, G., and Daly, L. (2008) Unjust Deserts. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anxo, D., Fagan, C., Letablier, M.-T., Perraudin, C., and Smith, M. (2007) Parental Leave in European Companies. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneil, B. (2009) Disability, self image, and modern political theory. Political Theory 37(2): 218–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baier, A.C. (1981) Cartesian persons. Philosophia 10(3): 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1992) Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969) Four essays on liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brault, M.W. (2012) Americans with disabilities: 2010. http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf.

  • Calaprice, A. (2011) The Ultimate Quotable Einstein. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2015) David Cameron speech on welfare. http://press.conservatives.com/post/111947329085/david-cameron-speech-on-welfare.

  • Carlyle, E. (2013) How self-made forbes 400 billionaires earned their money. http://www.forbes.com/sites/erincarlyle/2013/09/18/how-self-made-forbes-400-billionaires-earned-their-money/.

  • Carter, I., Kramer, M.H., and Steiner, H. (eds.) (2007) Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P.R. (eds.) (2008) Handbook of Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2002) Breaking the mould: An institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26(5): 539–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2010) 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, K. (2014) Genie: The story of the wild child. http://psychology.about.com/od/historyofpsychology/a/genie.htm.

  • Clark, J.B. (1956 [1899]) The Distribution of Wealth. New York: Kelley and Millman.

  • Cohen, G.A. (1989) On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99(4): 906–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, S. (2007) Depending on care: Recognition of vulnerability and the social contribution of care provision. Bioethics 21(9): 500–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engster, D. (2007) The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, M.A. (2010) The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State. Emory University School of Law Research Paper 10(130): 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (2008) Valuing Children: Rethinking the Economics of the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997) After the family wage: A postindustrial thought experiment. In: N. Fraser (ed.) Justice Interruptus (pp. 41–68). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., and Gordon, L. (2002) A Geneaology of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State. In: E.F. Kittay and E.K. Feder (eds.) The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency (pp. 14–39). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Freud, S. (1935) A General Introduction to Psycho-Analysis. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2013) The case for a negative income tax: A view from the right. In: K. Widerquist, J.A. Noguera, Y. Vanderborght, and J.D. Wispelaere (eds.) Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research (pp. 11–16). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2011) Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia 26(3): 591–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (2000) Available Light. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornick, J.C., and Meyers, M.K. (2009) Institutions that support gender equality in parenthood and employment. In: J.C. Gornick and M.K. Meyers (eds.) Gender Equality: Transforming Family Divisions of Labour (pp. 3–66). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grapard, U. (1995) Robinson Crusoe: The quintessential economic man? Feminist Economics 1(1): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A. (2006) France’s 35-hour week: Attack on business? Win-win reform? Or betrayal of disadvantaged workers? Politics & Society 34(4): 503–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. (1952 [1820]) Philosophy of Right. Translated by T. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hirschmann, N.J. (2003) The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1983 [1642]) De Cive. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Iversen, T., and Rosenbluth, F. (2006) The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross‐National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap. American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. (1999) Love’s Labor. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E., Jennings, B., and Wasunna, A.A. (2005) Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. Journal of Political Philosophy 13(4): 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K., Vehmas, S., and Shakespeare, T. (eds.) (2009) Arguing About Disability: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (2007 [1892]) The Conquest of Bread. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

  • Locke, J. (1980 [1689]) Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.

  • Mackenzie, C., and Stoljar, N. (eds.) (2000) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malleson, T. (2016) Offending the one percent: Seven arguments against distributive desert. New Political Science 38(2): 178–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G. (2013) Defending the one percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(3): 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1856) Speech at anniversary of the People’s Paper. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1856/04/14.htm.

  • Marx, K. (1933 [1867]) Capital (E. and C. Paul, Trans.). London: Dent.

  • Milanovic, B. (2012) Global inequality: From class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Global Policy 3(2): 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1997) Care of empowerment? A disability rights perspective. Social Policy & Administration 31(1): 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, L., and Nagel, T. (2002) The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelsky, J. (1989) Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1(7): 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (2001) The Gay Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nove, A. (1991) The Economics of Feasible Socialism (2nd ed.). London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. (2005) Bodies in Revolt: Gender, Disability, and a Workplace Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka, M. (2003) Libertarianism Without Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1960 [1920]) The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.

  • Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

  • Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

  • Putnam, H. (2002) The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D. C., and Ho, J. (eds.) (2010) Philosophical Reflections on Disability (Vol. 104). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R., Gornick, J.C., and Schmitt, J. (2010) Who cares? Assessing generosity and gender equality in parental leave policy designs in 21 countries. Journal of European Social Policy 20(3): 196–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RepublicanPartyPlatforms. (2012) 2012 Republican Party Platform. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=101961.

  • Riedmann, A. (2006) Working Time and Work-Life Balance in European Companies. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. (1994) A Future for Socialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. (1998) Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991) Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (1982) The Ethics of Liberty. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (2000) Justice and desert in liberal theory. California Law Review 88(3): 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebers, T. (2008) Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J.C. (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G.W., Simpson, J.L., Gonda, C., Ravesloot, C., and Coble, Z. (2010) Moving from independence to interdependence: A conceptual model for better understanding community participation of centers for independent living consumers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 20(4): 233–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widerquist, K., Noguera, J.A., Vanderborght, Y., and Wispelaere, J.D. (eds.) (2013) Basic Income: An Anthology of Contemporary Research. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielers, R., and Raven, D. (2013) Part-time work and work norms in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 29(1): 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaitchik, A. (1977) On deserving to deserve. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4): 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, I.K. (1993) Disability statistics, what we count and what it tells us: A personal and political analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 4(2): 9–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tom Malleson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malleson, T. Interdependency: The fourth existential insult to humanity. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 160–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0167-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0167-2

Keywords

Navigation