Skip to main content
Log in

Democracy, critique and the ontological turn

  • Critical Exchange
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adorno, T. (1974) Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (1999) Potentialities. Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2005) The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Translated by P. Dailey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, G. (2015) Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2003) Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2007) Being and Event. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. (1977) Toward a Phenomenology of Feminist Consciousness. In: M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston, & J. English (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baz, A. (2003) On when words are called for: Cavell, McDowell, and the wording of the world. Inquiry, 46(2003): 473–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1999) The Arcades Project. Translated by H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

  • Bohman, J. (2008) Critical Theory as Practical Knowledge: Participants, Observers and Critics. In: S. Turner & P. Roth (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosteels, B. (2011) The Actuality of Communism. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck-Morss, S. (2013) A Communist Ethics. In: S. Žižek (ed.), The Idea of Communism 2. London, New York: Verso, pp. 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2015) Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (2011) A World of Becoming. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. (1995) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, A. (2008) The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgement. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2011) The Government of Self and Others. Lectures at the Collège de France 19821983. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Foucault, M. (1984) What is Enlightenment? In: P. Dews (ed.), The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1989) Friendship as a Way of Life’. In: Foucault Live: Interviews 196684. New York: Semiotext(e).

  • Glynos, J. and D. Howarth. (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt M. and A. Negri. (2001) Empire. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, B. (2008) What is formal ontology? In: K. Munn and B. Smith (eds.), Applied Ontology: An Introduction. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, A. (2003). Democracy in Question. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompridis, N. (2011) Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory Between Past and Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompridis, N. (ed.). (2014) The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Times. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2000) Contingency, Universality, Hegemony (with J. Butler and S. Žižek). London: Verso.

  • Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2014) The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Translated by W. Moore and P. Cammack. London; New York: Verso.

  • Lara, M. (2007) Narrating Evil: A Post-Metaphysical Theory of Reflective Judgement. Columbia University Press.

  • Lefort, C. (1986) The Political Forms of Modern Society. Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Lefort, C. (1988) Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity in association with Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, P. (2014) The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, O. (2007) Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, O. (2017) Thinking Antagonism. Political Ontology After Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2014) The Misguided Search for the Political: Social Weightlessness in Radical Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London; New York, Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. (2014) Philosophy, the University and the Politics of Culture. The Grahame Lock Memorial Lecture. https://www.humanephilosophy.com/single-post/2014/11/13/Stephen-Mulhall-Philosophy-the-University-and-the-Politics-of-Culture-The-Grahame-Lock-Memorial-Lecture.

  • Nancy, J.-L. (2000) Being Singular Plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, T. (2002) Pour une définition ontologique de la multitude. Multitudes 9 (May–June 2002): 36–48.

  • Norval, A. (2008) Aversive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paipais, V. (2017) Political Ontology and International Political Thought: Voiding a Pluralist World. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. (2014a) Ontology and World Politics: Void Universalism I. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. (2014b) Theory of the Political Subject: Void Universalism II. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (1992) Political Criticism. Berkeley: University California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (1999) Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2007) The Lacanian Left. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strathausen, C. (ed.). (2009) A Leftist Ontology. Beyond Relativism and Identity Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, L. and Tonder, L. (2005) Radical Democracy: Politics Between Abundance and Lack. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, G. (2011) A Farewell to Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. (2017) The democratic duty to oppose Brexit. Political Quarterly, doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12338.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.K. (2000) Sustaining Affirmation. The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.K. (2004) Weak Ontology: Genealogy and Critical Issues. Keynote address to the conference on The Bearable Lightness of Being: Weak Ontology and the Affirmation of moral and Political Life. Northwestern University, US.

  • Wolin, S. (2000) Political Theory: From Vocation to Invocation. In: Frank, J. and Tambornino, J. (eds.), Vocations of Political Theory. Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. (1997) Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy and Policy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, L. (2016) A Democratic Theory of Judgement. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1987) Why Lacan is not a Post-structuralist? Newsletter of the Freudian Field 1(2): 31–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994) The Spectre of Ideology. In: S. Žižek (ed.), Mapping Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1999) The Ticklish Subject. The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2000) Class Struggle or Postmodernism? In: J. Butler, E. Laclau, S. Žižek (eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2002) For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a political factor. 2nd edn. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2011) Is it Still Possible to Be a Hegelian Today? In: L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, G. Harman (eds.), The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press.

  • Žižek, S. (2016) Democracy’s Fascism Problem. In: These Times, April 29. http://inthesetimes.com/article/19037/slavoj-zizek-democracys-fascism-problem.

  • Zupančič, A. (2000) Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan. London; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaela Mihai.

Additional information

This Critical Exchange is the result of two workshops held at the University of Edinburgh and the University of St. Andrews in November 2016. We thank the commentators at these events – Nathan Coombs, Patrick Hayden, Tony Lang and Nick Rengger – for their helpful feedback on the presentations. For institutional support, we owe gratitude to our home universities and Edinburgh University Press. Finally, we are grateful to Andrew Schaap for inviting us to edit the papers as a Critical Exchange for Contemporary Political Theory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mihai, M., McNay, L., Marchart, O. et al. Democracy, critique and the ontological turn. Contemp Polit Theory 16, 501–531 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0140-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0140-0

Navigation