Contemporary Political Theory

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 321–341 | Cite as

‘The return of things as they were’: New humanitarianism, restitutive desire and the politics of unrectifiable loss

Article

Abstract

The current proliferation of restitutive claims in response to expropriation in armed conflicts occurs at the interstices of humanitarianism and transitional justice. Restitution indicates the expansion of the humanitarian mandate from providing immediate relief to those who have suffered loss, to engaging in remedial, redressive and restorative practices. That intersection between the humanitarian goals and post-conflict justice is one of the signs of ‘new’ forms and ethos of humanitarianism. This article offers a critical reading of the ‘restitutive desire’ underpinning the humanitarian restitutive politics, which it relates to political fantasies of reversibility and undoing. It locates the genealogy of restitution in Émile Durkheim’s work on the division of labour, individualization and the distinction between repressive and restitutive law. It argues that in the Durkheimian socio-legal tradition restitution figures as a return of ‘matters to their former status’ and of ‘disturbed relationships to their normal form’. It then turns to Sigmund Freud’s essay on Daniel Schreber, which defines restitution not as procedure of undoing, but as a reparative practice that nevertheless affirms the subject’s ‘catastrophic loss of the world’. The Freudian perspective uncouples restitution and undoing and asks about the possibility of restitutive politics haunted by unrectifiable loss.

Keywords

restitution undoing new humanitarianism unrectifiable loss Émile Durkheim Sigmund Freud 

References

  1. Acorn, A. (2004) Compulsory Compassion: A Critique of Restorative Justice. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1993) The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arlow, J. A. and Brenner, C. (1969) The psychopathology of the psychoses: A proposed revision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 50: 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. Ballard, M.J. (2010) Post-conflict property restitution: Flawed legal and theoretical foundations. Berkeley Journal of International Law 28(2): 462–496.Google Scholar
  5. Barkan, E. (2000) The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, M. (2001) Humanitarianism with a sovereign face: UNHCR in the global undertow. International Migration Review 35(1): 244–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass, G. (2012) Reparations as a noble lie. In: M.S. Williams, R. Nagy, and J. Elster (eds.) Transitional Justice. New York: NYU Press, pp. 166–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berlant, L. (2012) Desire/Love. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, W. (2001) Politics Out of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butt, D. (2009) Rectifying International Injustice: Principles of Compensation and Restitution between Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chimni, B.S. (2004) From resettlement to involuntary repatriation: Towards a critical history of durable solutions to refugee problems. Refugee Survey Quarterly 23(3): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, E.B. and White, K. (2006) Durkheim and the ‘Sacred’. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coles, G. (1990) Approaching the Refugee Problem Today. In: G. Loescher and L. Monahan. (eds.) Refugees and the International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 373–410.Google Scholar
  14. Cordial, M. and Røsandhaug, K. (2009) Post-conflict Property Restitution. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coser, L. (2014 [1984]) Introduction to the 1984. In: É. Durkheim (ed.) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press Edition, pp. xi–xxiv.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (2001) On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. de Greiff, P. (ed.) (2006) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. du Plessis, M. and Peté, S. (eds.) (2007) Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses. Antwerp: Intersentia Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, É. (1984 [1893]) The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Durkheim, É. (2013 [1898]) Individualism and the Intellectuals. In: S. Lukes and A. Scull (eds.) Durkheim and the Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Durkheim, É. (1974 [1924]) Sociology and Philosophy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Durrant, S. (2014) Undoing Sovereignty: Towards a Theory of Critical Mourning. In: G. Buelens, S. Durrant, and R. Eaglestone (eds.) The Future of Trauma Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
  23. Fassin, D. (2011) Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fenichel, O. (2014) The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ferstman, C. and Rosenberg, S.P. (2009) Reparations in Dayton’s Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: C. Ferstman, M. Goetz, and A. Stephens (eds.) Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 483–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Final Report of the Commission of Experts Established Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780 (1994) United Nations Security Council S/1994/674. 27 May 1994. 17 December 2015, http://www.icty.org/x/file/About/OTP/un_commission_of_experts_report1994_en.pdf.
  27. Freud, S. (2001 [1909]) Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis. In: J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 10, London: Hogarth Press, pp. 153–318.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. (2001 [1911]) Psychoanalytic Comments on an Autobiographical Account of a Case of Paranoia. In: J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 12, London: Hogarth Press, pp. 3–84.Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1990 [1926]) Inhibitions, Symptoms, and Anxiety. In: J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 20, London: Hogarth Press, pp. 87–178.Google Scholar
  30. Hathaway, J.C. (1997) The meaning of repatriation. International Journal of Refugee Law 9(4): 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hassine, K. and S. Leckie (2015) The United Nations Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons: A Commentary. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Jankélévich, V. (2005) Forgiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, R.A. (1986) Émile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 24–59.Google Scholar
  34. Käpylä, J. and Kennedy, D. (2014) Cruel to care? Investigating the governance of compassion in the humanitarian imaginary. International Theory 6(2): 255–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khalip, J. and Collings, D. (2014) Introduction. In: J. Khalip and D. Collings (eds.) Romanticism and Disaster. College Park: University of Maryland Press.Google Scholar
  36. Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. (1973) The Language of Psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  37. Laplante, J.L. (2013) The Plural Justice Aims of Reparations. In: S. Buckley-Zistel (ed.) Transitional Justice Theories. London: Routledge, pp. 66–84.Google Scholar
  38. Leckie, S. and Huggins, C. (2011) Conflict and Housing, Land and Property Rights. A Handbook on Issues, Frameworks, and Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lenhard, J. (2011) A Critical Account of Durkheim’s Concept of Organic Solidarity. Munich: GRIN Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Long, K. (2013) The Point of No Return: Refugees, Rights, and Repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Looney, A.T. (2015) Vladimir Jankélévitch: The Time of Forgiveness. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lukes, S. (2014) Introduction to this Edition. In: É. Durkheim (ed.) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press, pp. xxv–xlvi.Google Scholar
  43. McCallin, B. (2012) Restitution and Legal Pluralism in Contexts of Displacement. Research Case Study. New York: International Centre for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
  44. McCallin, B. (2013) The Role of Restitution in Post-Conflict Situations. In: J. Darrel and R.C. Williams (eds.) Land and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding. London: Routledge, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  45. Moffett, L. (2016) Transitional Justice and Reparations: Remedying the Past? In: D. Jacobs (ed.) Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. Cheltenham Glos: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar
  46. Moore, B. and Fine, B. (1990) Restitution. In: B. Moore and B. Fine (eds.) Psychoanalysis: The Major Concepts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pavlich, G. (2013 [2005]) Governing Paradoxes of Restorative Justice. London: Routlegde.Google Scholar
  48. Philpott, C. (2005) Though the dog is dead, the pig must be killed: Finishing with property restitution to Bosnia-Herzegovina’s IDPs and refugees. Journal of Refugee Studies 18(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pensky, M. (2003) The relevance of the past: Between construction and debt. Intertexts 7(2): 131–143.Google Scholar
  50. Redfield, P. (2012) Humanitarianism. In: D. Fassin (ed.) A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 451–466.Google Scholar
  51. Selim, Y. and Murithi, T. (2011) Transitional justice and development: Partners for sustainable peace in Africa? Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 6(2): 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sherwood, M. (2013 [1969]) The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Simanic, N. (2006) Forced Migration and Ethnic Conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Migration Citizenship Education. 19 September 2014, http://migrationeducation.de/20.0.html.
  54. Smit, A. (2012) The Property Rights of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons. Beyond Restitution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, C. (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thomason, K.K. (2015) Transitional Justice and Structural Justice. In: C. Corradetti, N. Eisikovits, and J.V. Rotondi (eds.) Theorizing Transitional Justice. Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 71–80.Google Scholar
  57. Torpey, J.C. (2006) Making Whole What Has Been Smashed: On Reparation Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. UNHCR Presents Bosnia Repatriation Plans (1996) Press Release REF/1131. 17 December 2015, http://www.un.org/press/en/1996/19960117.ref1131.html.
  59. Unruth, J. and Rhodri C.W. (2013) Land: A Foundation for Peacebuilding. In: J. Unruth and R.C. Williams (eds.) Land and Post-conflict Peacebuilding. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  60. Walasek, H. (ed.) (2015) Bosnia and the Destruction of Cultural Heritage. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  61. Walker, M.U. (2006) Moral Repair: Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walker, M.U. (2015) Making Reparations Possible: Theorizing Reparative Justice. In: C. Corradetti, N. Eisikovits, and J.V. Rotondi (eds.) Theorizing Transitional Justice. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 211–224.Google Scholar
  63. Williams, R.C. (2007) The Contemporary Right to Property Restitution in the Context of Transitional Justice. Briefing Paper. International Centre for Transitional Justice. October 30, 2014, https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Global-Right-Restitution-2007-English.pdf.
  64. Williams, R.C. (2012) Protection in the Past Sense: Restitution at the Junction of Humanitarian Response to Displacement and Transitional Justice. In: R. Duthie (ed.) Transitional Justice and Displacement. New York: Social Justice Research Council, pp. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zolkos, M. (2011) Reconciling Community and Subjective Life. Trauma Testimony as Political Theorizing in the Work of Jean Améry and Imre Kértesz. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social JusticeAustralian Catholic UniversityNorth SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations