Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Europarties in the neighbourhood: how transnational party politics bind Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans to the EU

Comparative European Politics volume 19, pages 77–93 (2021)Cite this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Transnational European party federations—‘Europarties’—are an overlooked actor of EU external relations despite their strong footprint outside the EU. This article discusses the activities of Europarties as networks of EU external relations closely aligned with the interests and values of EU foreign policy but conditioned by their character as transnational partisan actors with distinct ideological affinity and political commitments to partner parties in the European neighbourhood. Empirically, the article investigates the activities of the centre-right European People’s Party in Georgia and North Macedonia, demonstrating how Europarties can act as amplifiers of EU influence in Eastern Europe and Western Balkans, but also how their partisan interests often come into tension with EU priorities. The findings carry implications for the theory and practice of EU relations with its neighbourhood at a time when prospects for further enlargement appear significantly weakened.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 18 July 2013. Interview with PES official, Brussels, 11 July 2013.

  2. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  3. Interview with ex-VMRO member, Skopje, 16 November 2018.

  4. Interview with ex-VMRO member, Skopje, 16 November 2018.

  5. Interview with PES official, Brussels, 11 July 2013.

  6. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  7. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  8. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 28 November 2018.

  9. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 27 November 2018.

  10. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  11. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  12. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  13. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  14. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  15. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 28 November 2018.

  16. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 27 November 2018.

  17. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 28 November 2018.

  18. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 28 November 2018.

  19. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  20. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  21. Interview with ex-VMRO member, Skopje, 17 November 2018. Interview with VMRO cadre, Skopje, 28 November 2018.

  22. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  23. Interview with ex-VMRO member, Skopje, 16 November 2018.

  24. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018.

  25. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018. Interview with ex-UNM cadre, Brussels, 15 November 2018.

  26. Interview with EPP official, Brussels, 26 November 2018. Interview with ex-VMRO member, Skopje, 17 November 2018.

References

  • Bader, M. 2010. Against All Odds: Aiding Political Parties in Georgia and Ukraine. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD Thesis.

  • Bardi, L., and E. Calossi. 2009. Models of Party Organization and Europarties. In Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada, ed. J. DeBardeleben and J.H. Pammett, 151–171. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C.J., D. Hodson, and U. Puetter (eds.). 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. 2010. European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy. Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (2): 191–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T.A., A. Dimitrova, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2017. European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity: Concepts, Findings, and Policy Implications. Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2): 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, G., and E. Korosteleva-Polglasse. 2009. Changing Belarus? The Limits of EU Governance in Eastern Europe and the Promise of Partnership. Cooperation and Conflict 44 (2): 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressanelli, E. 2014. Europarties After Enlargement: Organization, Ideology and Competition. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, V.J., and S.L. Wolchik. 2010. Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. World Politics 62 (1): 43–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. 2016. After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System? West European Politics 39 (5): 992–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssogelos, A.-S. 2015. Patterns of Transnational Partisan Contestation of European Foreign Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review 20 (2): 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssogelos, A.-S. 2017. Transnational European Party Federations as EU Foreign Policy Actors: The Activities of Europarties in Eastern Partnership States. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (2): 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianciara, A.K. 2016. ‘Europeanization’ as a Legitimation Strategy of Political Parties: the Cases of Ukraine and Georgia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (3): 391–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPP. 2015. The Backsliding of Democracy in Georgia: Emergency Resolution adopted at the EPP Congress, Madrid, 21st–22nd October 2015, https://www.epp.eu/papers/the-backsliding-of-democracy-in-georgia/.

  • EPP. 2016. Georgian government must deliver on European standards for a better future for the country. Tbilisi, 1 April 2016, https://www.epp.eu/press-releases/georgian-government-must-deliver-on-european-standards-for-a-better-future-for-the-country/.

  • EurActiv. 2013. War of Letters Reveals Georgia’s Political Tensions. 12 March 2013, https://www.euractiv.com/section/europe-s-east/news/war-of-letters-reveals-georgia-s-political-tensions/.

  • EurActiv. 2015. European parties add fuel to fire in Macedonia. 18 May 2015, https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/european-parties-add-fuel-to-fire-in-macedonia/.

  • European Western Balkans. 2017. S&D Leader Pittella Calls on Sanctions, Questions VMRO-DPMNE Membership in EPP. Brussels, 29 April 2017, https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2017/04/29/sd-leader-pittela-calls-on-sanctions-questions-vmro-dpmne-membership-in-epp/.

  • Evangelista, M. 1995. The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures and Security Policy in Russia and the Soviet Union. International Organization 49 (1): 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonck, D. 2018. Parliamentary Diplomacy and Legislative-Executive Relations in EU Foreign Policy: Studying the European Parliament’s Mediation of the Macedonian Political Crisis (2015–2017). Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (6): 1305–1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagatek, W. 2010. European Political Parties as Campaign Organizations: Towards a Greater Politicization of European Parliament Elections. Brussels: Centre for European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, H.E. 2006. Democracy or Autocracy on the March? The Colored Revolutions as Normal Dynamics of Patronal Presidentialism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39: 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertner, I. 2018. United in Diversity? Europarties and their Individual Members’ Rights. Journal of European Integration, advance online publication,. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1513500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., and C. Lord. 1997. Political Parties in the European Union. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, R.D. 2017. Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union. Government and Opposition 52 (2): 211–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klápácová, L. 2013. The Role of European Political Parties as Actors of European Union’s Conditionality. Case Study: EU Conditionality Actorness of the European People’s Party. Bratislava: Comenius University PhD Thesis.

  • Klüver, H., and T. Rodon. 2013. Explaining Policy Position Choice of Europarties: The Effect of Legislative Resources. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 629–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B., and B. Rittberger. 2006. The “Governance Turn” in EU Studies. Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (Annual Review): 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2008. A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 938–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., and F. Schimmelfenning. 2011. EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance? Democratization 18 (4): 885–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehne, S. 2014. Time to Reset the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels: Carnegie Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. 2006. The Consolidation of Europarties? The ‘Party Regulation’ and the Development of Political Parties in the European Union. Journal of Representative Democracy 42 (4): 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, W. 2008. Europe: I Struggle, I Overcome. Brussels: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, M.J., and H. van der Veer. 2019. MEP Responses to Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Poland. An Analysis of Agenda-Setting and Voting Behaviour. Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (4): 838–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitoiu, C. 2017. Framing the EU’s Policy towards the Neighbourhood: The Strategic Approach of the Seventh European Parliament (2009–2014). Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (1): 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitoiu, C., and M. Sus. 2017. The European Parliament’s Diplomacy—A Tool for Projecting EU Power in Times of Crisis? The Case of the Cox-Kwasniewski Mission. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (1): 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. 2014. Comparative Perspectives on Transnational Party-Building in New Democracies: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica 49 (1): 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, S., and N. Wunsch. 2020. Money, Power, Glory: The Linkages between EU Conditionality and State Capture in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy 27 (1): 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2007. Transnational Actors and World Politics. In Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, ed. W. Zimmerli et al., 251–286. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T. (ed.) .1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rosen, G., and K. Rauben. 2018. Influence beyond Formal Powers: The Parliamentarisation of European Union Security Policy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20 (1): 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfenning, F., and H. Scholtz. 2008. EU Democracy Promotion in the European Neighbourhood: Political Conditionality, Economic Development and Transnational Exchange. European Union Politics 9 (2): 187–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shagina, M. 2017. Joining a Prestigious Club: Cooperation with Europarties and Its Impact on Party Development in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine 2004–2015. Stuttgart: ibidem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojarova, V., and P. Emerson. 2013. Party Politics in the Western Balkans. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojić, M. 2017. Party Responses to the EU in the Western Balkans: Transformation, Opposition or Defiance?. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, M.A. 2008. Tempered by the EU? Political Parties and Party Systems Before and After Accession. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 861–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachudova, M.A. 2014. EU Leverage and National Interests in the Balkans: The Puzzles of Enlargement Ten Years On. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 122–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hecke, S. 2010. Do Transnational Party Federations Matter? (…And Why Should We Care?). Journal of Contemporary European Research 6 (3): 395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • von dem Berge, B. 2017. Europarty Eastern Enlargement: An Empirical Analysis of Europarty Influence on Central and Eastern European Parties and Party Systems. East European Politics 33 (4): 472–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. 2009. Democracy Promotion as External Governance? Journal of European Public Policy 16 (6): 895–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zur Hausen, C. 2008. Der Beitrag der ‘Europarteien’ zur Demokratisierung der Europaischen Union. Marburg: Tectum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Stelios Stavridis and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous drafts of the article. He would also like to express his gratitude to all European and national party officials who agreed to be interviewed. Any errors and omissions are the author’s alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences, London Metropolitan University, 166-220 Holloway Road, London, N7 8DB, UK

    Angelos Chryssogelos

Authors
  1. Angelos Chryssogelos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelos Chryssogelos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chryssogelos, A. Europarties in the neighbourhood: how transnational party politics bind Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans to the EU. Comp Eur Polit 19, 77–93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00223-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00223-4

Keywords

search

Navigation