Advertisement

Language matters? Antecedents and political consequences of support for bilingualism in Canada and Finland

  • Mike MedeirosEmail author
  • Åsa von Schoultz
  • Hanna Wass
Original Article

Abstract

Language policies are important sociopolitical features of multilingual countries. Not only do they regulate relations with governmental authorities, but they can also impact intergroup relations. Yet, empirical research has tended to ignore language policies. Very little is known in relation to the factors that lead individuals to support or oppose such policies. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, there is relatively little knowledge regarding the influence of attitudes towards language policies on subsequent political phenomena. The present article seeks to address these gaps by exploring bilingualism in Canada and Finland. Specifically, using survey data from both countries’ national election studies, the article, firstly, examines factors that can account for support towards bilingualism and, secondly, it investigates the relationship of these attitudes with vote choice. The results reveal two main findings. Firstly, support for bilingualism seems to be associated with context-specific factors; a general pattern of determinants is not indicated by the results. Secondly, attitudes towards bilingualism are found to have a significant association on vote choice in both Canada and Finland.

Keywords

Bilingualism Minorities Voting Canada Finland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the funding provided by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland (Grant No 312710) and the Academy of Finland (Grant No 316239). We also thank this journal’s anonymous referees for their advice and suggestions.

References

  1. Achen, C.H., and L.M. Bartels. 2016. Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alapuro, R., and H. Stenius. 1987. Kansanliikkeet loivat kansakunnan. In Kansa Liikkeessä, ed. R. Alapuro, I. Liikanen, K. Smeds, and H. Stenius. Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä.Google Scholar
  3. Albright, J.J. 2010. The multidimensional nature of party competition. Party Politics 16(6): 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azaiza, F., R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, M. Shoham, M. Amara, A. Mor-Sommerfeld, and N. ‘Ali. 2011. Attitudes towards bilingual arab-hebrew education in Israel: A comparative study of Jewish and Arab Adults. Language, Culture and Curriculum 24(2): 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bélanger, Éric, and Richard Nadeau. 2016. The bloc québécois in a rainbow-coloured quebec. In The Canadian Federal Election of 2015, ed. J.H. Pammett and C. Dornan. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
  6. Bengtsson, Åsa. 2011. Svenska Folkpartiet Som Förvaltare Av Det Politiska Och Sociala Kapitalet. In Det Finlandssvenska Sociala Kapitalet: Fakta Eller Fiktion. Helsinki: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
  7. Bengtsson, Åsa, Kimmo Grönlund, and L. Karvonen. 2005. Språk Och Parti. In Den Finlandssvenska Väljaren. Türku: Institutet för finlandssvensk samhällsforskning.Google Scholar
  8. Broermann, M. 2007. Language attitudes among minority youth in Finland and germany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2007 (187–188): 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cardinal, L. 2004. The limits of bilingualism in Canada. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10(1): 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çelebi, E., M. Verkuyten, and N. Smyrnioti. 2016. Support for Kurdish Language Rights in Turkey: The roles of ethnic group, group identifications, contact, and intergroup perceptions. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39(6): 1034–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Citrin, J., D.P. Green, C. Muste, and C. Wong. 1997. Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. Journal of Politics 59(3): 858–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkins, D.J. 1989. Facing our destiny: Rights and Canadian distinctiveness. Canadian Journal of Political Science 22(4): 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esman, M.J. 1982. The politics of official bilingualism in Canada. Political Science Quarterly 97(2): 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnäs, F. 2004. Finlandssvenskarna 2002. En Statistisk Rapport. Helsinki: Svenska Finlands Folkting.Google Scholar
  15. Fournier, P., F. Cutler, S. Soroka, and D. Stolle. 2015. The 2015 Canadian election study. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  16. Fournier, P., F. Cutler, S. Soroka, D. Stolle, and É. Bélanger. 2013. Riding the orange wave: Leadership, values, issues, and the 2011 Canadian Election. Canadian Journal of Political Science 46(4): 863–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauvin, J.-P., C. Chhim, and M. Medeiros. 2016. Did they mind the gap? Voter/party ideological proximity between the BQ, the NDP and Quebec Voters, 2006–2011. Canadian Journal of Political Science 49(2): 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grönlund, K., and E. Kestilä-Kekkonen. 2016. Finnish National Election Study 2015. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive.Google Scholar
  19. Harel-Shalev, A. 2006. The status of minority languages in deeply divided societies: Urdu in India and Arabic in Israel—A comparative perspective. Israel Studies Forum 21(2): 28–57.Google Scholar
  20. Hehman, E., S.L. Gaertner, J.F. Dovidio, E.W. Mania, R. Guerra, D.C. Wilson, and B.M. Friel. 2012. Group status drives majority and minority integration preferences. Psychological Science 23(1): 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ihalainen, Pasi and T. Saarinen. 2015. Constructing ‘language’ in language policy discourse: Finnish and Swedish legislative processes in the 2000s. In Language policies in Finland and Sweden. Interdisciplinary and multi-sited comparisons, ed. M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen and T. Saarinen. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  22. Kymlicka, W. 2001. Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laycock, David. 2005. Populism and the New Right in English Canada. In Populism and the mirror of democracy, ed. F. Panizza. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Lecours, A. 2012. Sub-state nationalism in the western world: Explaining continued appeal. Ethnopolitics 11(3): 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, A.H., and J.I. Ricks. 2012. Coalitions and language politics: Policy shifts in Southeast Asia. World Politics 64(3): 476–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lublin, D. 2013. The 2012 Latvia Language Referendum. Electoral Studies 2(32): 385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McRae, K.D. 1983. Conflict and compromise in multilingual societies: Swtizerland, vol. 1. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  28. McRae, K.D. 1997. Conflict and compromise in multilingual societies: Finland, vol. 3. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  29. McRoberts, K. 1997. Misconceiving Canada: The struggle for national unity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Medeiros, M. 2019. National frenemies: Linguistic intergroup attitudes in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42(16): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Medeiros, M. 2017. Refining the influence of language on national attachment: Exploring linguistic threat perceptions in Quebec. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 23(4): 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meinander, H. 2015. “Språkfrågan Sedan 1863.” In Makten Att Kombinera. Utmaningar, Vägval Och Handlingskraft I Svenskfinland, ed. S. Sjöblom and S. Sandberg. Helsinki: Svenska kulturfonden.Google Scholar
  33. Meinander, Henrik. 2016. Nationalstaten. Finlands svenskhet 19222015. Helsingfors: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
  34. Nadeau, R., and C.J. Fleury. 1995. Gains Linguistiques Anticipés et Appui à la Souveraineté du Québec. Canadian Journal of Political Science 28(1): 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palozzi, V.J. 2006. Assessing voter attitude toward language policy issues in the United States. Language Policy 5(1): 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillipson, Robert. 1999. “Political Science.” In Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity, ed. J. A. Fishman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, J.P., W.P. Rivers, and R.D. Brecht. 2006. Demographic and sociopolitical predictors of American attitudes towards foreign language policy. Language Policy 5(4): 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Safran, W., and A.H. Liu. 2012. Nation-building, collective identity, and language choices: Between instrumental and value rationalities. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 18(3): 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saideman, S.M., and R.W. Ayres. 2000. Determining the causes of irredentism: Logit analyses of minorities at risk data from the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Politics 62(4): 1126–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saukkonen, Pasi. 2012. The finnish paradox: Language and politics in Finland. Recode Working Paper Series, Vol. 5, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. Saukkonen, P. 2013. Erilaisuuksien Suomi. Vähemmistö- ja kotouttamispolitiikan vaihtoehdot. Gaudeamus: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Scheepers, P., M. Gijsberts, and E. Hello. 2002. Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe: Cross-national tests on a controversial relationship. Review of Religious Research 43(3): 242–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwennicke, A. 2017. A discussion of Christopher H. Achen and Larry M. Bartels’ Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Perspectives on Politics 15(1): 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shapiro, D.M., and M. Stelcner. 1981. Male-female earnings differentials and the role of language in Canada, Ontario, and Quebec, 1970. The Canadian Journal of Economics 14(2): 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sniderman, P.M., J.F. Fletcher, P.H. Russell, and P.E. Tetlock. 1989. Political culture and the problem of double standards: Mass and elite attitudes toward language rights in the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms. Canadian Journal of Political Science 22(2): 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sundberg, Jan. (2016). Finland. In European journal of political research: political data yearbook. ed. A. Bågenholm, K. Deegan-Krause and L. Weeks: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Tilley, J. 2015. ‘We Don’t Do God’? Religion and Party Choice in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 45(4): 907–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ullman, S.H. 1986. The political attitudes of new Brunswick’s Acadians and anglophones: Old wine in old bottles? American Review of Canadian Studies 16(2): 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vallée-Dubois, Florence, Ruth Dassonneville, and Jean-François Godbout. 2017. About time: Age, period, and cohort effects on support for Quebec sovereignty. Nations and Nationalism.Google Scholar
  50. von Schoultz, Åsa. (forthcoming). Åsiktsöverensstämmelse i språkfrågan—Representerar partierna väljarnas åsikter? In Ur majoritetens perspektiv. Förklaringar till finskspråkiga finländares åsikter om svenskan i Finland, ed. S. Himmelroos, and K. Strandberg. Helsingfors: Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
  51. Wilkes, R., N. Guppy, and L. Farris. 2008. “No Thanks, We’re Full”: Individual characteristics, national context, and changing attitudes toward immigration. International Migration Review 42(2): 302–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations