Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Common market, normative power or super-state? Conflicting political identities in EU asylum and immigration policy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Drawing an analogy to the role of immigration policy in processes of state formation, this article argues that the development of common asylum/immigration policies is indicative of the normative tensions implied in the EU’s transition from a regulatory polity towards a political Union. Based on an analysis of key legislative texts from the emergence of common immigration policies until today, it is shown that policy developments are torn between three competing and conflicting political identities. The EU’s traditional ‘market power’ identity anchored in a regulatory approach focused on economic priorities has given way to an uneasy competition between aspirations at ‘normative power’ identity based on universal liberal values and a politically predominant ‘statist’ identity that addresses asylum/immigration policies as a corollary of and challenge to internal community-building and security. While these tensions are characteristic of the ‘liberal paradox’ of democratic states’ immigration policies, they are particularly challenging in the context of an increasingly contested European integration project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. If there are references to human rights so mainly in view of promoting human rights in countries of origin of asylum seekers and refugees in order to reduce the root causes of forced migration (Commission 1994, p. 22ff.).

  2. Drawing on the principle of non-discrimination, the Court extended free movement rights first to posted workers who were long-term resident third-country nationals employed by European firms under the freedom of services (Rulings 12/86 Demirel [1986] ECR 37/9) and then to long-term resident third-country national from countries with which the EU had signed association agreements containing relevant clauses, such as Turkey and Morocco (rulings C-192/89 Sevince [1990] ECR; I-3461, C-18/90 Kziber [1991] ECR 199).

  3. Charte 4332/00, Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union—amendments submitted by the members of the Convention regarding civil and political rights and citizens’ rights, Brussels 25 May 2000.

  4. See European Parliament, report by Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler on the amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status adopted in Plenary on 25 September 2005, A6-0222/2005 and UNHCR press release of 30 April 2004.

References

  • Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1973. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. 1994. Transnational Citizenship. Membership and Rights in International Migration. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, S. 2005. ‘Integration’ as a Process of Inclusion for Migrants? The Case of Long-Term Residents in the EU. CEPS Working Document no. 219.

  • Chetail, V. 2014. The Transnational Movement of Persons Under General International Law—Mapping the Customary Law Foundations of International Migration Law. In Research Handbook on International Law and Migration, ed. V. Chetail and C. Bauloz, 1–72. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coordinators Group. 1999. “The Palma Document” Free Movement of Persons. A Report to the European Council by the Coordinators’ Group, Madrid.

  • Damro, C. 2012. Market Power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Burca, G. 2013. After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court as a Human Rights Adjudicator? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 20 (2): 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Capitani, E. 2010. The Evolving Role of the European Parliament in the AFSJ. In The Institutional Dimension of the European Union’s Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice, ed. J. Monar, 113–144. Brussels: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 1985. White Paper to the European Council Completing the Single Market. COM (85) 310 final of 14 June, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 1994. Communication on Immigration and Asylum Policy. COM(94) 23 final of 23 February, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2000. Communication on a Community Immigration Policy. COM(2000) 757 final of 22 November, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2001. Proposal for a Council Directive on the Conditions of Entry and Residence of Third-Country Nationals for the Purpose of Paid Employment and Self-Employed Economic Activities. COM(2001) 386 final of 11 July, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2004a. Communication for the Commission, Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: Assessment of the Tampere Programme and Future Orientations. Annex, COM (2004) 401 final, SEC (2004) 693 final of 2 June, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2004b. Green Paper on an EU Approach to Managing Economic Migration. COM (2004) 811 final, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2005. Policy Plan on Legal Migration. MEMO/05/494Brussels, 21 December, Brussels.

  • European Commission. 2010. Communication on Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. COM(2010) 2020 final of 3 March, Brussels.

  • European Convention. 2002. Presidium Report on Justice and Home Affairs—Progress Report and General Problems. CONV 69/02 of 31 May, Brussels.

  • European Council. 1984. Conclusions of the Presidency, 25 and 26 June 1984. Bulletin EC 6/84.

  • European Council. 1999. Tampere European council Conclusions of 23/24 October 1999.

  • European Council. 2017. Rome Declaration of 25 March 2017.

  • European Parliament. 1992. Decision on the Number and Membership of Parliamentary Committees. B3-0036/92 of 16 January, Brussels.

  • European Parliament. 2008. The European Parliament as a Champion of European Values. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genschel, P., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 2013. Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. 2003. The Refugee in International Society: Between Sovereigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammar, T. 1990. Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, J.F. 1992. Immigrants, Markets and States. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2017. Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, S., E. Grande, and H. Kriesi (eds.). 2016. Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C., and C. Kreuder-Sonnen. 2017. European Studies and the European Crisis: Legal and Political Science Between Critique and Complacency. European Law Journal 23 (1–2): 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuder-Sonnen, C. 2016. Beyond Integration Theory: The (Anti-)Constitutional Dimension of European Crisis Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (6): 1350–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2001. The Europeanisation of Refugee Policies: Normative Challenges and Institutional Legacies. Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (5): 851–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2006. Towards a Constitutionalization of Aliens’ Rights in the European Union? Journal of European Public Policy 13 (8): 1284–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2018a. Migration. In Oxford Handbook of Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood, ed. T. Börzel, A. Draude, and T. Risse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2018b. Regional Migration Governance. Building Bloc of Global Initiatives? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2018.1441606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. 2018c. ‘Failing Forward’ Towards Which Europe? Organized Hypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (5): 1195–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., and F. Jurje. 2015. The Migration-Trade Nexus: Migration Provisions in Trade Agreements. In Handbook of International Political Economy of Migration, ed. L. Talani and S. Mc Mahon, 259–284. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S., and W. Wagner. 2007. Which European Public Order? Sources of Imbalance in the European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. European Security 16 (3/4): 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. 1997. From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 17 (2): 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe. A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, K. 1998. The currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menz, G. 2015. Framing the Matter Differently: The Political Dynamics of European Union Labour Migration Policymaking. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (4): 554–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menz, Georg. 2019. Understanding the identity of a policy field: the European Commission and liberal modernization in the domain of labour and social policy. Comparative European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00176-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Engels, M. 2002. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Work of the Convention. Committee on the Affairs of the European Union. Berlin: German Bundestag.

  • Niemann, A. and Zaun, N. 2018. EU Refugee Policies and Politics in Times of Crisis: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (1): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, Sabine, and Mark Thatcher. 2019. Constructing the EU’s political identity in policy making. Comparative European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00169-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic?. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, J. 2000. The Invention of the Passport. Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauner, F. 2016. Asylum Policy: The EU’s ‘Crises’ and the Looming Policy Regime Failure. Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolberg, A.R. 2000. The Dawn of Cosmopolitan Denizenship. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7 (2): 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research nccr – on the move funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Lavenex.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lavenex, S. Common market, normative power or super-state? Conflicting political identities in EU asylum and immigration policy. Comp Eur Polit 17, 567–584 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00175-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00175-4

Keywords

Navigation