EU migration policy and border controls: from chaotic to cohesive differentiation
The EU’s migration policy is comprised of a series of initiatives, agreements, regulations, and common standards in various fields—involving different states that participate to different degrees while attempting to address common issues. The resulting complex multilayered framework is commonly analyzed from two opposing perspectives about the continued differentiated integration of the EU and its member states. The first one focuses on issues raised by the chaotic nature of flexible arrangements or an “à la carte” integration in the field of migration. From this perspective, differentiated integration is symptomatic of an existential crisis fueled by EU states unwilling to move toward an “ever closer union.” The second perspective, in contrast, refers to differentiation in migration policy as the inevitable model of differentiated integration in other policy areas—based on the revival of coalition building as a tool of governance in a multispeed Europe. From this perspective, differentiated integration is legitimized as the most effective remedy to prevent the risk of disintegration. The article provides a critical evaluation of differentiated integration in order to analyze the implications of the still unfolding migration crisis. Its aim is to identify a more feasible—and ideally more ethical—institutional system of “cohesive differentiation.”
KeywordsMigration Border controls Cohesive differentiation Schengen Dublin regulations Asylum crisis
- Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Balzacq, Thierry, and Sagrario Carrera. 2006. Security Versus Freedom? A Challenge for Europe’s Future. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Law of the peoples, Distributive Justice, and Migrations. Fordham Law Review 72(5): 1761–1787.Google Scholar
- Bigo, Didier. 2005. Frontier Controls in the European Union: Who is in Control? In Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe, ed. Didier Bigo and Guild Elspeth. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Bigo, Didier. 1994. The European Internal Security Field: States and Rivalries in a Newly Developing Area of Police Intervention. In Policing Across National Boundaries, ed. M. den Boer and M. Anderson. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
- European Agenda on Migration. 2015. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/152/immigration-policy. Accessed 19 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2018. “Security Union: Political Agreement Reached on a Stronger Schengen Information System”. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/news/security-union-political-agreement-reached-stronger-schengen-information-system-sis_en. Accessed 3 Sept 2018.
- European Commission. 2017a. Revised European Neighbourhood Policy, Press Release (May 18, 2017). Accessed 25 Mar 2018.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2017b. White Paper on the Future of Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/white-paper-future-europe_en. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2017c. The Road From Rome: Managing Migration. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/02_migration_en_web.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2017d. Preserving and Strengthening the Schengen Area. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-3408_en.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2016a. Study on the Temporary Protection Directive. Brussels: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/asylum/temporary-protection/docs/executive_summary_evaluation_tpd_en.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018
- European Commission. 2016b. Back to Schengen. A Roadmap. Brussels, 4.3.2016, COM (2016) 120 final. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/docs/communication-back-to-schengen-roadmap_en.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2016c. Towards a Reform of the Common European Asylum System and Enhancing Legal venues to Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council, COM (2016) 197 final. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/proposal-implementation-package/docs/20160406/towards_a_reform_of_the_common_european_asylum_system_and_enhancing_legal_avenues_to_europe_-_20160406_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2018.
- European Commission. 2015. Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/5-presidents-report_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2018.
- European Council. 2014. Conclusions, 26–27 June. https://data.consilium.europa.edu/doc/documents/ST-79-2014-INIT/en/pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2018.
- European Parliament. 2018. Annual Report on the Functioning of the Schengen Area. PV 29.05/2018-18. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2018-0228+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.
- European Parliament. 2017. Recast Eurodac Regulation. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/589808/EPRS_BRI(2016)589808_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2018.
- European Parliament. 2016a. Draft Report on Improving the Functioning of the European Union Building on the Potential of the Lisbon Treaty. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-573.146+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN. Accessed 20 Sept 2018.
- European Parliament. 2016b. Cost of Non-Schengen: The Impact of Border Controls Within Schengen on The Single Market. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578974/IPOL_STU(2016)578974_EN.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2018.
- Huysmans, Jef. 2005. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration, and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Immergut, Ellen. 2011. Democratic Theory and Policy Analysis: Four Models of Policy, Politics and Choice. Zeitschrift fur Public Policy 1: 69–86.Google Scholar
- Koenig, Nicole. 2015. “A Differentiated View of Differentiated Integration,” Policy Paper, 140. Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute.Google Scholar
- Leuffen, Dirk, Berthold Rittberger, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration. Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Lindberg, Leon N., and Stuart A. Scheingold. 1970. Europe’s Would Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Morillas, Pol. 2017. Shapes of a Union: From Ever Closer Union to Flexible Differentiation after Brexit. Notes Internacionals CIDOB 166: 1–6.Google Scholar
- Pirozzi, Nicoletta, Tortola, Pier Dominico, Vai, Lorenzo. 2017. “Differentiated Integration: A Way Forward for Europe,” EU60: Re-founding Europe, Instituto Affari Internationali.Google Scholar
- Rome Declaration. 2017. https://europa.eu/european-union/eu60_en. Accessed 6 Oct 2018.
- Verhofstadt, Guy et al. 2018. “Let’s Reinvent Europe to Reclaim its Promise and Heal its Divisions,” The Guardian, September 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/27/reinvent-europe-reclaim-promise-heal-divisions#img-1. Accessed 30 Nov 2018.