After the crisis: political protest in the aftermath of the economic recession

Abstract

Economic recessions have often led to stronger citizen activism. This article assesses the relationship between the economy and protest in 2014, 6 years after the global financial crisis took place, a long-enough period for countries to have improved their economic situation and for people’s interpretations of the economy to be more optimistic. Does the economy still matter to explain protest if it is not as salient any longer? This research employs data for available European Union member states from the 2006, 2008, and 2014 European Social Survey to test the importance of national-level objective economic indicators as well as individual-level evaluations of financial well-being. Findings from the research suggest that objective economic predictors are more relevant to understand protest in 2014 than before the crisis. Economic resources remain more important for the prediction of protest than deprivation views, with the exception of unemployment. Even at times of partial economic recovery, the state of the economy helps explain increased levels of political protest across Europe well after 2008. The link between the economy and confrontational activism before and after the economic recession looks in the end very similar and a full economic recovery in the future can lead to even more protest activism in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kern et al. (2015) employ European Social Survey data from 2002 to 2010, whereas Vassallo and Ding (2016) use European Social Survey data from 2008 to 2012. Both of them opted for a multilevel analysis at the individual and country level. Quaranta (2016) focuses only on the macro-level (countries) with data from 2000 to 2014.

  2. 2.

    On this point, with regard to the new protest wave after 2008, Della Porta (2015) remarked that ‘protests have socialized into politics a new generation’ (p. 219), underlining the relevance of the global recession’s link to stronger activism levels in general.

  3. 3.

    See (Vassallo 2018) for a longer presentation on the evolution of protest measures.

  4. 4.

    ‘Government by petition’ seems also to have become particularly relevant over the last few years as movements embrace it to force governments on the defense. See the UK government’s decision to postpone American President Donald Trump’s visit after almost three millions residents signed a petition against his official visit to the UK.

  5. 5.

    The ‘www.grabyourwallet.org’ Web site was started in November 2016 and has since become a powerful reminder of how consumers can use their wallets for political pressure. An equally successful movement is ‘Sleeping Giants,’ active on Facebook and Twitter.

  6. 6.

    Among the EU member states studied in this article, only Finland, the Netherlands, and Slovenia recorded a lower GDP per capita in Purchasing Power Standards in 2014 (Eurostat). France, and Ireland, in particular, had growing a GDP per capita after 2012, when the economic crisis peaked according to Eurostat data. Among the better cases, Germany did not suffer any decline in GDP per capita over the same period, and Sweden recorded a stable value for the same economic measure.

  7. 7.

    Among the worst cases for unemployment, Spain registered an improvement in unemployment numbers in 2014 (24.5%), after a peak of 24.8% in 2012. By 2016, the same number had decreased to 19.6%.

  8. 8.

    EU countries included in the analysis for 2014 are the only ones released so far from Round 7 (May 2016): Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. For the 2006 and 2008 data analysis (Round 3 and 4) the EU countries included are, respectively, 21 and 24 (see Table 2 for the full list).

  9. 9.

    The Principal Components Analysis function in SPSS extracted only one component for each EU country and for the EU at large when the three specific actions were considered (demonstration, petition and boycott). For instance, for the 2014 data, the reliability analysis for the scale returned Cronbach’ α values from a minimum of 0.341 (the Netherlands) to a maximum of 0.612 (Ireland). The corresponding reliability value for the EU at large was 0.501.

  10. 10.

    The use of this type of scale is not always endorsed (see Quaranta 2013), but it is frequently used in the study of unconventional political activism (Dalton et al. 2010; Solt 2015; Kern et al. 2015; Vassallo and Ding 2016) as it is a good representation of different preferences for unconventionality among citizens, especially from a diverse group of countries.

  11. 11.

    This finding confirms the interpretation that participation in a legal demonstration may simply be more challenging and demanding than signing a petition or boycotting a certain product. The equivalence across the diverse protest activities also affects possible evaluations concerning unconventional behavior intensity across countries.

  12. 12.

    It is important to also mention the ranking of the six Eastern European countries (Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, Estonia and the Czech Republic) in the 2014 sample: all of them at the very bottom. This is not unusual, especially when compared to the position of the ten Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia) in the larger sample of cases for 2008. The situation on unconventional political behavior in EU members from the former Eastern European area needs a paper in itself to be discussed properly.

  13. 13.

    Individuals are grouped within countries and the estimate of the variance component of the country effect in 2014 is 0.249 (sig .012), with an overall prediction accuracy of 62.6%. The same regression for 2008 has an estimate of the variance component of the country effect of 0.230 (sig .003), with an overall prediction accuracy of 70.3%, whereas the estimate of the variance components of the country effect for the 2006 model is 0.308 (sig .005), with a prediction accuracy of 68.6%.

  14. 14.

    Germany’s GDP per capita in PPS grew progressively from 116 in 2006 to 126 in 2014 (Eurostat).

  15. 15.

    Spain’s GDP per capita in PPS decreased from 103 in 2006 to 90 in 2014 (Eurostat).

  16. 16.

    The data collected demonstrated an overall increase in protest activism, with a stronger or weaker connection to economic indicators depending on the country observed. The primary focus of this article is on the EU level relationship between economic variables and protest activism.

  17. 17.

    Lindvall (2014) refers to the Great Depression and the Great Recession as ‘the two greatest global economic crises of the past one hundred years’ (p. 750). The timing, development, and expansion patterns make them comparable case studies.

References

  1. Accornero, G., and P. Ramos Pinto. 2015. ‘Mild Mannered’? Protest and Mobilization in Portugal under Austerity, 2010–2013. West European Politics 38(3): 491–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ancelovici, M. 2015. Crisis and Contention in Europe: A Political Process Account of Anti-austerity Protest. In Europe’s Prolonged Crisis, ed. H. Trenz, C. Ruzza, and V. Guiraudon, 189–209. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, C., and J. Hecht. 2014. Crisis of Confidence? The Dynamics of Economic Opinions during the Great Recession. In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, ed. N. Bermeo and L. Bartels, 40–71. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armingeon, K., and K. Guthmann. 2014. Democracy in Crisis? The Declining Support for National Democracy in European Countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research 53(3): 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Auvinen, J. 1997. Political Conflict in Less Developed Countries 1981–1989. Journal of Peace Research 34(2): 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes, S., and M. Kaase (eds.). 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beissinger, M., and G. Sasse. 2014. An End to “Patience”? In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes and Protest in the Great Recession, ed. N. Bermeo and L. Bartels, 334–370. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calvo, K. 2013. Fighting for a Voice: The Spanish 15-M/Indignados Movement. In Understanding European Movements, ed. C. Flasher Fominaya and L. Cox, 236–253. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caren, N., R. Ghoshal, and V. Ribas. 2011. A Social Movement Generation: Cohort and Period Trends in Protest Attendance and Petition Signing. American Sociological Review 76(1): 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalton, R. 2014. Citizen Politics. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalton, R., A. Van Sickle, and S. Weldon. 2010. The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Della Porta, D. 2015. Social Movements in Times of Austerity: Bringing Capitalism back into Protest Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dodson, K. 2011. The Movement Society in Comparative Perspective. Mobilization 16(4): 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubrow, J., K. Slomczynski, and I. Tomescu-Dubrow. 2008. Effects of Democracy and Inequality on Soft Political Protest in Europe. International Journal of Sociology 38 (3): 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. European Commission. Eurostat. (2006). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en.

  16. European Commission. Eurostat. (2008). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en.

  17. European Commission. Eurostat. (2014). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en.

  18. European Social Survey. 2006. ESS Round 3: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. Data file edition 3.5 NSD. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.

  19. European Social Survey. 2008. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey Round 4 Data. Data file edition 4.3 NSD. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.

  20. European Social Survey. 2014. ESS Round 7: European Social Survey Round 7 Data. Data file edition 2.0 NSD. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and Distributor of ESS Data for ESS ERIC.

  21. Gallego, A. 2007 Inequality in Political Participation: Contemporary Patterns in European Countries. Center for the Study of Democracy Working Papers, UC Irvine.

  22. Gurr, T. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heck, R., S. Thomas, and L. Tabata. 2012. Multilevel Modeling of Categorical Outcomes Using IBM SPSS. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hooghe, M. 2012. Taking to the Streets. Harvard International Review 34(2): 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imig, D., and S. Tarrow. 1999. The Europeanization of Movements? A New Approach to Transnational Contention. In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, ed. D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, and D. Rucht, 112–133. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inglehart, R., and G. Catterberg. 2002. Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-honeymoon Decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43(3–5): 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jenkins, J.C., M. Wallace, and A. Fullerton. 2008. A Social Movement Society? International Journal of Sociology 38(3): 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kern, A., S. Marien, and M. Hooghe. 2015. Economic Crisis and Levels of Political Participation in Europe (2002–2010): The Role of Resources and Grievances. West European Politics 38(3): 465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kosmidis, S. 2014. Government Constraints and Accountability: Economic Voting in Greece Before and During the IMF Intervention. West European Politics 37(5): 1136–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lahusen, C. 2013. The Protests of the Unemployed in France, Germany and Sweden (1994–2004): Protest Dynamics and Political Contexts. Social Movement Studies 12(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lichbach, M. 1989. Does Economic Inequality Breed Political Conflict? World Politics 41(4): 431–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindvall, J. 2014. The Electoral Consequences of Two Great Crises. European Journal of Political Research 53(4): 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marien, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2010. Inequalities in Non-institutionalized Forms of Political Participation: A Multi-level Analysis of 25 Countries. Political Studies 58(1): 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Melo, D., and D. Stockemer. 2014. Age and Political Participation in Germany, France and the UK: A Comparative Analysis. Comparative European Politics 12(1): 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Norris, P., S. Walgrave, and P. van Aelst. 2006. Does Protest Signify Disaffection? In Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies, ed. M. Torcal and J. Montero. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Powell, G.B. 1982. Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Quaranta, M. 2013. Measuring Political Protest in Western Europe: Assessing Cross-National Equivalence. European Political Science Review 5(3): 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quaranta, M. 2016. Protesting in ‘Hard Times’: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Europe, 2000–2014. Current Sociology 64(5): 736–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rucht, D. 2007. The Spread of Protest Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. R. Dalton and H.D. Klingemann, 708–723. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rüdig, W., and G. Karyotis. 2014. Who Protests in Greece? Mass Opposition to Austerity. British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sanders, D., and P. Bellucci. 2012. Informal Political Engagement in Europe, 1975–2007. In Citizens and the European Polity, ed. D. Sanders, P. Magalhães, and G. Tόka, 39–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schussman, A., and S.A. Soule. 2005. Process and Protest: Accounting for Individual Protest Participation. Social Forces 84(2): 1083–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Singer, M. 2011. Who Says “It’s the Economy?” Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies 44(3): 284–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Solt, F. 2015. Economic Inequality and Nonviolent Protest. Social Science Quarterly 96(5): 1314–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stolle, D., M. Hooghe, and M. Micheletti. 2005. Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation. International Political Science Review 26(3): 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Torcal, M., T. Rodon, and M.J. Hierro. 2016. Word on the Street: The Persistence of Leftist-Dominated Protest in Europe. West European Politics 39(2): 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Trenz, H., C. Ruzza, and V. Guiraudon (eds.). 2015. Europe’s Prolonged Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van Aelst, P., and S. Walgrave. 2001. Who is that (Wo)man in the Street? From the Normalization of Protest to the Normalization of the Protester. European Journal of Political Research 39(4): 461–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vassallo, F. 2018. The Evolution of Protest Research: Measures and Approaches. PS: Political Science & Politics 51(4): 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vassallo, F., and P. Ding. 2016. Explaining Protest in the Aftermath of the Great Recession in Europe: The Relevance of Different Economic Indicators. Partecipazione e Conflitto 9(1): 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Verney, S., and A. Bosco. 2013. Living Parallel Lives: Italy and Greece in an Age of Austerity. South European Society and Politics 18(4): 397–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Welzel, C., and F. Deutsch. 2012. Emancipative Values and Non-violent Protest: The Importance of ‘Ecological’ Effects. British Journal of Political Science 42(2): 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Vassallo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Variable list

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 Protest index levels (%) in EU members.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vassallo, F. After the crisis: political protest in the aftermath of the economic recession. Comp Eur Polit 18, 45–72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00156-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Austerity
  • Contentious politics
  • Economic recession
  • European public opinion
  • Protest activism