Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sub-state nationalism and populism: the cases of Vlaams Belang, New Flemish Alliance and DéFI in Belgium

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This contribution assesses whether populism is inherently embedded in and combined with the ideology of sub-state nationalist parties, using Belgium as a case study. We argue that sub-state nationalist parties tend to emphasize the opposition between a territorial community (‘us’) versus a dominant center (‘them’), a dichotomous view that could overlap with the populist ideology focusing on the opposition between the homogeneous people and the ‘corrupt’ elite. We compare the policy positions of the three major sub-state nationalist parties that operate in Belgium: the Vlaams Belang, the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) and Democrat Federalist Independent, using their manifestos and membership magazines between 2010 and 2015. We show that the manner in which sub-state nationalist parties combine their stances on territoriality to a populist rationale depends on their relationship to power (government vs. opposition). In doing so, this contribution uniquely relates populism to the territorial dimension of Belgian politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albertazzi, D., and D. McDonnell. 2016. Populists in Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyens, S., K. Deschouwer, E. van Haute, and T. Verthé. 2017. Born Again, or Born Anew. Assessing the Newness of the Belgian Political Party New Flemish Alliance (N-VA). Party Politics 23(4): 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonikowski, B. and N. Gidron. 2016 Populist claims-making in the Fifth European Parliament, 1999-2004. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.

  • Breuilly, J. 1994. Nationalism and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conversi, D. 2002 Conceptualizing Nationalism. An introduction to Walker Connor’s Work. In D. Conversi, eds. Ethnonationalism in the Contemporary World. Walker Connor and the Study of Nationalism. Routledge Advances in International Relations and Global Politics. London: Routledge.

  • Danero Iglesias, J. 2013. Constructing National History in Political Discourse: Contradiction (Moldova, 2001–2009). Nationalist Papers 41(5): 780–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danero Iglesias, J. 2015. An Ad Hoc Nation. An Analysis of Moldovan Election Campaign Clips. East European Politics and Societies 29(4): 850–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dardis, F.E., F. Baumgartner, A.E. Boydstun, S. De Boef, and F. Shen. 2008. Media Framing of Capital Punishment and Its Impact on Individuals’ Cognitive Responses. Mass Communication and Society 11(2): 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L., and H. Tursan. 1998. Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, H., and P. Scheepers. 1997. Twintig jaar Vlaams Blok. Herkomst, Evolutie en Toekomst van Partij en Kiezers. Internationale Spectator 7–8: 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • DéFI. 2013 La force gagnante des libéraux sociaux pour donner de l’ambition à la Wallonie et à Bruxelles. Manifeste.

  • DéFI. 2014EU. Programme Elections européennes 2014.

  • DéFI. 2014FED. Programme Fédéral 2014.

  • DéFI. 2014B. Programme Région bruxelloise et Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles.

  • DéFI. 2014W Programme Région wallonne et Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles.

  • DéFi. 2014. Dimension. Le bimestriel des Fédéralistes démocrates francophones. December.

  • DéFi. 2015-1/2. Dimension. Le bimestriel des Fédéralistes démocrates francophones. March and June.

  • Delwit, P. 2017. Du parti libéral au MR. 170 ans de libéralisme en Belgique. Brussels: Editions de l’université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschouwer, K. 2009. Coalition formation and Congruence Between the Federal and the Regional Level. Regional and Federal Studies 19(1): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deschouwer, K., P. Delwit, M. Hooghe, B. Rihouw, and S. Walgrave. 2015. Décrypter l’électeur/De kiezer ontcijferd. Leuven: Lannoo Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. 1998. Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology? Political Studies 46(4): 748–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinisch, R., Massetti, E. and Mazzoleni, O. 2018. Populism and Ethno-Territorial Politics in European Multilevel Systems. Comparative European Politics (Special issue).

  • Hermet, G. 1996. Histoire des nations et du nationalisme en Europe. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagers, J., and S. Walgrave. 2007. Populism as Political Communication Style: an Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C. 2009. New Research Agendas on Regional Party Competition. Regional and Federal Studies 19(4): 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C., and A. Schakel. 2013. Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second Order’ Elections?’. Regional Studies 47(3): 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massetti, E., and A. Schakel. 2016. Decentralisation reforms and regionalist parties’ strength: accommodation, empowerment or both? Political Studies 65: 432–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, O. and S. Mueller (eds.). 2017. Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, N., and B. Petersohn. 2015. Between autonomy and interdependence: the challenges of shared rule after the Scottish Referendum. The Political Quarterly 86(2): 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, L. 2001. Ethno-territorial concurrence in multinational societies: The Spanish comunidades autonomas. In Multinational Democracies, ed. A.G. Gagnon and J. Tully, 201–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2000. The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(3): 541–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • N-VA. 2010. Verkiezingsprogramme. Nu durven veranderen. Een sterk sociaal en economisch perspectief voor Vlaanderen en Wallonië. 13 June.

  • N-VA. 2014. Nieuw-Vlaams Magazine, no. 1–10.

  • N-VA. 2014. Verkiezingsprogramma Vlaamse, federale en Europese verkiezingen. Verandering Voor Vooruitgang. 25 May.

  • N-VA. 2015. Nieuw-Vlaams Magazine, no. 1–10.

  • Pauwels, T. 2011. Explaining the strange decline of the populist radical right Vlaams Belang in Belgium. The impact of permanent opposition. Acta Politica 46(1): 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, T. 2014. Populism in Western Europe. Comparing Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, T., and E. van Haute. 2016. The Vlaams Belang: party organization and party dynamics. In Understanding Populist Party Organization. The Radical Right in Western Europe, ed. R. Heinisch and O. Mazzoleni, 49–78. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, J.-B., and R. Dandoy. 2014. L’évolution programmatique du FDF, d’un parti mono-enjeu à un parti régionaliste à vocation généraliste. In FDF. 50 ans d’engagement politique, ed. V. Dujardin and V. Delcorps. Brussels: Racine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M., and T. Pauwels. 2011. Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis. West European Politics 34(6): 1272–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovira Kaltwasser, C., P.A. Taggart, Espejo P. Ochoa, and P. Ostiguy (eds.). 2017. The Oxford Handbook on Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeon, R., and D.-P. Conway. 2001. Federalism and the management of conflict in multinational societies. In Multinational Democracies, ed. A.G. Gagnon and J. Tully. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinardet, D. 2012. Is there a Belgian public sphere? What the case of a federal multilingual country can contribute to the debate on transnational public spheres. And vice versa’. In Multinational Federalism: Problems and Prospects, ed. M. Seymour and A.-G. Gagnon, 172–204. New-York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sinardet, D., and N. Morsink. 2011. Contamination or Containment? Sub-state nationalism in Belgian political parties’electoral manifestoes (1965-2010). Paper presented at the ECPR Conference, Reykjavik, 25–27 August.

  • Van Haute, E., and J.-B. Pilet. 2006. Regionalist Parties in Belgium (VU, RW, FDF): Victims of Their Own Success? Regional and Federal Studies 16(3): 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Haute, E., and T. Pauwels. 2016. The Vlaams Belang: Party organization and party dynamics. In Understanding Populist Party Organisation, ed. R. Heinisch and O. Mazzoleni, 49–78. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • VB. 2010. Programma. Federale verkiezingen 2010. Vlamingen eerst.

  • VB. 2014a. Verkiezingsprogramma. Uw stok achter de deur.

  • VB. 2014b. Vlaams Belang. Ledenblad van de Vlaams-Nationale partij: Echt onafhankelijk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50 – CP 124, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Emilie van Haute & Teun Pauwels

  2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Dave Sinardet

Authors
  1. Emilie van Haute
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teun Pauwels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dave Sinardet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilie van Haute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Haute, E., Pauwels, T. & Sinardet, D. Sub-state nationalism and populism: the cases of Vlaams Belang, New Flemish Alliance and DéFI in Belgium. Comp Eur Polit 16, 954–975 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0144-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0144-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation