This paper focuses on the role of gender in the generation of coherence and legitimacy of austerity, as applied in the European Union. It examines the rhetorical defences of austerity and unpacks the gendered nature of the reforms that austerity programmes required. The absence of gender-sensitive analysis in policy making is an absence that is essential to both the coherence and the legitimacy of austerity. The findings from this discourse analysis are a direct contribution to the project of understanding austerity as an ideological and political phenomenon. This project has, thus far, excluded such considerations. This analysis shows the, often contradictory, roles that gender plays in the discourse of austerity, highlighting the need for research that appreciates the need for such nuances. It also shows how gender plays a role in the key economic arguments for austerity, in particular that of the fiscal multiplier and those surrounding labour market reforms. As austerity in the European Union is normalised and adjusted in coming years, these findings will continue to be relevant until the debates over austerity take gender seriously.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allon, F. 2014. The feminisation of finance: Gender, labour and the limits of inclusion. Australian Feminist Studies 29: 12–30.
Annesley, C., and A. Scheele. 2011. Gender, capitalism and economic Crisis: Impact and responses. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 19: 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2011.610604.
Antonopoulos, R., K. Kim, T. Masterson, A. Zacharias. 2010. Investing in care: A strategy for effective and equitable job creation (Economics Working Paper Archive No. wp_610). Levy Economics Institute.
Bakker, I. 1994. The strategic silence: Gender and economic policy. London: Zed Books.
Ban, C. 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the International Monetary Fund since the Great Recession. Governance 28: 167–183.
Bartl, M. 2017. Contesting austerity: On the limits of EU knowledge governance. Journal of Law and Society 44: 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12018.
Bettio, F. 2013. The impact of the economic crisis on the situation of women and men and on gender equality policies: Synthesis report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Blanchard, O.J., and D. Leigh. 2014. Learning about fiscal multipliers from growth forecast errors. IMF Economic Review 62: 179–212.
Blanchard, O.J., and D. Leigh. 2013. Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. The American Economic Review 103: 117–120.
Blyth, M. 2013. Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bramall, R. 2013. The cultural politics of austerity: Past and present in austere times. Berlin: Springer.
Bruff, I., and S. Wöhl. 2016. Constitutionalizing austerity, disciplining the household. In Scandalous economics: Gender and the politics of financial crises, ed. A.A. Hozic and J. True. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buti, M., N. Carnot. 2013. The debate on fiscal policy in Europe: Beyond the austerity myth. ECFIN Economic Brief 20.
Cavaghan, R. 2017. The gender politics of EU economic policy: Policy shifts and contestations before and after the crisis. In Gender and the economic crisis in Europe, ed. J. Kantola and E. Lombardo, 49–71. Berlin: Springer.
Clauwaert, S. 2015. The country specific recommendations (CSRs) in the social field. An overview and comparison. Update including the CSRs 2015-2016. Background Analysis No 2015.03. ETUI.
Commission, E. 2014. Country specific reports.
Connell, R. 2006. Glass ceilings or gendered institutions? Mapping the gender regimes of public sector worksites. Public Administration Review 66: 837–849.
Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S. 2015. The political power of economic ideas: The case of ‘expansionary fiscal contractions’. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 17: 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12038.
Elliott, L. 2016. Austerity policies do more harm than good, IMF study concludes. The Guardian, May 27. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/27/austerity-policies-do-more-harm-than-good-imf-study-concludes.
Elomaki, A. 2012. The price of austerity: The impact on women’s rights and gender equality in Europe. European Women’s Lobby. http://womenlobby.org/spip.php.
Elson, D. 2004. Engendering government budgets in the context of globalization(s). International Feminist Journal of Politics 6: 623–642.
Elson, D. 1999. Labor markets as gendered institutions: Equality, efficiency and empowerment issues. World Development 27: 611–627.
Elson, D. 1991. Male bias in macro-economics: The case of structural adjustment. In Male bias in the development process 164–190.
Emejulu, A., and L. Bassel. 2017. Whose crisis counts? Minority women, austerity and activism in France and Britain. In Gender and the economic crisis in Europe, ed. J. Kantola and E. Lombardo, 185–208. Berlin: Springer.
European Parliament. 2013. REPORT on the impact of the economic crisis on gender equality and women’s rights—A7-0048/2013 [WWW Document]. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A7-2013-0048+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN. Accessed 5 June 2017.
Ferber, M.A., and J.A. Nelson. 2009. Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Guerrina, R. 2017. Gendering European economic narratives: Assessing the costs of the crisis to gender equality. In Gender and the economic crisis in Europe, ed. J. Kantola and E. Lombardo, 95–115. Berlin: Springer.
Helgadóttir, O. 2016. The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 23: 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1106573.
Hopkin, J., and B. Rosamond. 2017. Post-truth politics, bullshit and bad ideas: ‘Deficit fetishism’ in the UK. New Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1373757.
Juncker, J.C., D. Tusk, J. Dijsselbloem, M. Draghi, and M. Schulz. 2015. Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Five Presidents’ Report. Brussels: European Commission.
Kantola, J., and E. Lombardo. 2017. Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality. Berlin: Springer.
Karamessini, M., and J. Rubery. 2013. Women and austerity: The economic crisis and the future for gender equality. London: Routledge.
Krugman, P. 2013. How the case for austerity has crumbled [WWW Document]. The New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/06/06/how-case-austerity-has-crumbled/. Accessed 16 May 2017.
Matthijs, M., and M. Blyth. 2018. When is it rational to learn the wrong lessons? Technocratic authority, social learning, and Euro fragility. Perspectives on Politics 16: 110–126.
O’Dwyer, M. 2017. Gendering Ideational Political Economy in the European Union. Presented at the ECPG, Lausanne.
O’Dwyer, M. 2016. The role of gender norms in the construction of the EU Economic Sphere. Presented at IAFFE Annual Conference, Galway.
Perrons, D. 2017. Gender and inequality: Austerity and alternatives. Intereconomics 52: 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0639-x.
Perrons, D. 2015. Gendering the inequality debate. Gender & Development 23: 207–222.
Rubery, J. 2015a. Austerity, the public sector and the threat to gender equality—Geary Lecture 2014. The Economic and Social Review 46: 1–27.
Rubery, J. 2015b. Austerity and the future for gender equality in Europe. ILR Review 68: 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793915588892.
Sassen, S. 2000. Women’s burden: Counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival. Journal of International Affairs 53: 503–524.
Schmidt, V. 2016a. The resilience of ‘bad ideas’ in eurozone crisis discourse (even as rival ideas inform changing practices). In The 23rd International Conference of Europeanists. Ces.
Schmidt, V. 2016b. Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics 39: 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389.
Schmidt, V.A., and M. Thatcher. 2014. Why are neoliberal ideas so resilient in Europe’s political economy? Critical Policy Studies 8: 340–347.
Schuberth, H., and B. Young. 2011. The role of gender in governance of the financial sector. Questioning Financial Governance from a Feminist Perspective 9: 132.
Spangenberg, U., A. Gunnarsson, and M. Schratzenstaller. 2017. Gender equality and taxation in the European Union. Study for the FEMM Committee. Brussels: European Union.
Standing, G. 1999. Global feminization through flexible labor: A theme revisited. World Development 27: 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00151-X.
Stiglitz, J.E., 2016. The Euro: How a Common Currency Threatens the Future of Europe. WW Norton & Company.
Strolovitch, D.Z. 2013. Of Mancessions and Hecoveries: Race, gender, and the political construction of economic crises and recoveries. Perspectives on Politics 11: 167–176.
Walby, S. 2015. Crisis. New York: Wiley.
Weiner, E., H. MacRae. 2014. The persistent invisibility of gender in EU policy: Introduction. Weiner, Elaine and Heather MacRae (2014):‘The persistent invisibility of gender in EU policy: Introduction’. In Weiner, Elaine and Heather MacRae eds. The persistent invisibility of gender in EU policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Special.
Wren-Lewis, S. 2016. A general theory of austerity. BSG Working Paper Series. Oxford: University of Oxford.
An annual prize awarded by Comparative European Politics in conjunction with the Council for European Studies Research Network on European Integration and the Global Political Economy.
About this article
Cite this article
O’Dwyer, M. Making sense of austerity: the gendered ideas of European economic policy. Comp Eur Polit 16, 745–761 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-018-0129-y
- European Economic Governance
- Discourse analysis