What to expect from European identity? Explaining support for solidarity in times of crisis

Original Article

Abstract

Having a European identity is expected to influence citizens’ attitudes and behaviour towards the EU community. European identity is indeed positively related to support for EU integration, but are citizens with a stronger European identity also willing to pay a price for this identification, and to what extent? The contribution provides an answer to these questions by performing multilevel analyses on the EES 2014 data. The analyses show that citizens with a stronger European identity are more supportive of financial solidarity with member states in economic crisis. This explanation for support for solidarity is stronger than explanations provided by self-interest and economic ideological position. Citizens are thus willing to pay a price for their European identity. However, one can only expect so much from European identity as significant interaction effects show that the positive relationship between European identity and support for solidarity is mitigated by experiencing economic hardship.

Keywords

European identity solidarity self-interest economic ideological position euro crisis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the researchers of the European Election Study 2014 for the data gathering and for making the data available for use, two anonymous reviewers and Joost de Moor for their valuable comments and the KU Leuven Research Council and Riksbankens Jubileumfond for research funding.

References

  1. Archer, M. 2013. Solidarity and governance, Extra Series 14. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, C., E.V. Sapir, and G. Zapryanova. 2012. Trust in the institutions of the European Union: A cross-country examination. European Integration online Papers 16(2).Google Scholar
  3. Ashford, B.E., and F. Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.Google Scholar
  4. Auer, S. 2014. The limits of transnational solidarity and the Eurozone crisis in Germany, Ireland and Slovakia. Perspectives 15(3): 322–334.Google Scholar
  5. Baden, C., and N. Springer. 2014. Complementing the news on the financial crisis: The contribution of news users’ commentary to the diversity of viewpoints in the public debate. European Journal of Communication 29(5): 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balch, G.I. 1974. Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy”. Political Methodology 1(2): 1–43.Google Scholar
  7. Bansak, K., M.M. Bechtel, J. Hainmueller, and Y. Margalit. 2016. The ideological basis of the Grexit debate. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 16-9.Google Scholar
  8. Bechtel, M.M., J. Hainmueller, and Y. Margalit. 2014. Preferences for international redistribution: The divide over the Eurozone bailouts. American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 835–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beetham, D., and C. Lord. 1998. Legitimacy and the European Union. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beramendi, P., and D. Stegmueller. 2016. The political geography of the Eurocrisis. Paper prepared for the workshop ‘Preferences over Redistribution’, Duke University. Google Scholar
  11. Bruter, M. 2008. Identity in the European union—Problems of measurement, modelling & paradoxical patterns of influence. Journal of Contemporary European Research 4(4): 273–285.Google Scholar
  12. Bundesregierung. 2011. Regierungserklärung: Merkel: Europa muss Stabilitätsunion werden’, Berlin, 26 October. Available at https://www.bundesregierung.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Artikel/2011/10/2011-10-26-merkel-regierungserklaerung-er-euro.html?nn=392660.
  13. Cinnirella, M. 1996. A social identity perspective on european integration. In Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change, ed. G.M. Breakwell and E. Lyons, 253–274. Oxford: Butterworth-Heimann.Google Scholar
  14. Ciornei, I., and E. Recchi. 2017. At the source of European solidarity: Assessing the effects of cross-border practices and political attitudes. Journal of Common Market Studies 55(3): 468–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cramme, O., and S.B. Hobolt. 2015. Democratic politics in a European union under stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Daniele, G., and B. Geys. 2015. Public support for European fiscal integration in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22(5): 650–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Beer, P. 2009. Sticking together or falling apart? Solidarity in an era of individualization and globalization. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drury, J., R. Brow, R. González, and D. Miranda. 2016. Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in disaster: Solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology 46(2): 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duchesne, S., and A.-P. Frognier. 2008. National and European identifications: A dual relationship. Comparative European Politics 6(2): 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eurostat. 2017a. GDP per capita in purchasing power standards. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/setupDownloads.do.
  21. Eurostat. 2017b. Unemployment rates. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=une_rt_a&lang=en.
  22. Fligstein, N. 2008. Euroclash: The EU, European identity and the future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gabel, M., and G.D. Whitten. 1997. Economic conditions, economic perceptions, and public support for european integration. Political Behavior 19(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garry, J., and J. Tilley. 2009. The macroeconomic factors conditioning the impact of identity on attitudes towards the EU. European Union Politics 10(3): 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garry, J., and J. Tilley. 2015. Inequality, state ownership and the European Union: How economic context and economic ideology shape support for the European Union. European Union Politics 16(1): 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gawronski, B. 2007. Editorial: Attitudes can be measured! But what is an attitude? Social Cognition 25(5): 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grande, E., and S. Hutter. 2016. Introduction: European integration and the challenge of politicisation. In Politicising Europe: Integration and mass politics, ed. S. Hutter, E. Grande, and H. Kriesi, 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grande, E., and H. Kriesi. 2015. The restructuring of political conflict in Europe and the politicization of European integration. In European public spheres. Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 190–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hechter, M. 1988. Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hennessy, A. 2013. Informal governance and the Eurozone crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 21(3): 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herrmann, R.K., and M.B. Brewer. 2004. Identities and institutions: Becoming European in the EU. In Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU, ed. R.K. Herrmann, T. Risse, and M.B. Brewer, 1–22. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Hetherington, M. 2005. Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hix, S. 2008. What’s wrong with the European union and how to fix it. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hobolt, S.B. 2015. Public attitudes towards the Euro crisis. In Democratic politics in a European union under stress, ed. O. Cramme and S.B. Hobolt, 48–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hobolt, S.B., and C. Wratil. 2015. Public opinion and the crisis: The dynamics of support for the euro. Journal of European Public Policy 22(2): 238–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2005. Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics 6(4): 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. A postfunctionalist Theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hox, J.J. 2010. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Huddy, L., and N. Khatib. 2007. American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Joris, W., L. d’Haenens, and B. Van Gorp. 2014. The euro crisis in metaphors and frames: Focus on the press in the Low Countries. European Journal of Communication 29(5): 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaina, V., and I.P. Karolewski. 2009. EU governance and European identity. Living Reviews in European Governance 4(2): 5–41.Google Scholar
  42. Klandermans, P.G. 2014. Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology 35(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kleider, H., and F. Stoeckel. 2016. Left-wing but unwilling to support international redistribution? Explaining public support for fiscal transfers in the EU. EUI working papers MWP2016/17. Google Scholar
  44. Knutsen, O. 1997. The partisan and the value-based components on left-right self-placement: A comparative study. International Political Science Review 18(2): 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuhn, T., H. Solaz, and E. van Elsas. forthcoming. Practicing what you preach: How cosmopolitanism promotes willingness to redistribute transnationally. Journal of European Public Policy. Google Scholar
  46. Kuhn, T., and F. Stoeckel. 2014. When European integration becomes costly: The Euro crisis and public support for European economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy 21(4): 624–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kymlicka, W. 2001. Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Long, S.J. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Loveless, M. 2013. The deterioration of democratic political culture: Consequences of the perception of inequality. Social Justice Research 26(4): 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mcevoy, C. 2016. The role of political efficacy on public opinion in the European union. Journal of Common Market Studies 54(5): 1159–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mood, C. 2010. Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muñoz, J., M. Torcal, and E. Bonet. 2011. Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European union: Congruence or compensation? European Union Politics 12(4): 551–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norman, G. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15(5): 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Brien, R.M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41(5): 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Popa, S.A., H. Schmitt, S.B. Hobolt, and E. Teperoglou. 2015. EES 2014 Voter Study Advance Release Notes. Mannheim: MZES, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
  56. Quintelier, E., S. Verhaegen, and M. Hooghe. 2014. The intergenerational transmission of European identity: The role of gender and discussion within families. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1103–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rabe-Hesketh, S., and A. Skrondal. 2005. Multilevel and longitudinal modelling using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  58. Reese, G., and O. Lauenstein. 2014. The Eurozone crisis: Psychological mechanisms undermining and supporting European solidarity. Social Sciences 3(1): 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Risse, T. 2010. A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Risse, T. 2014. No demos? Identities and public spheres in the Euro crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(6): 1207–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rohrschneider, R. 2002. The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scharpf, F.W. 2015. Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area. In Democratic politics in a European union under stress, ed. O. Cramme and S.B. Hobolt, 19–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Schmitt, H., S.A. Popa, S.B. Hobolt, and E. Teperoglou. 2015. European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, C., and K. Sorrell. 2014. On social solidarity. In The palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study, ed. V. Jeffries, 219–248. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simpson, K., and M. Loveless. 2016. Another chance? Concerns about inequality, support for the European Union and further European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 24(7): 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stoeckel, F., and T. Kuhn. 2017. Mobilizing citizens for costly policies: the conditional effect of party cues on support for international bailouts in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies.Google Scholar
  67. Tajfel, H. 1981. Human groups and social categories. Studies in social psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Turner, J.C. 1982. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Social identity and intergroup relations, ed. H. Tajfel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. van Spanje, J., and C.H. de Vreese. 2011. So what’s wrong with the EU? Motivations underlying the Eurosceptic vote in the 2009 European elections. European Union Politics 12(3): 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verhaegen, S., and M. Hooghe. 2015. Does more knowledge about the European union lead to a stronger European identity? A comparative analysis among adolescents in 21 European member states. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28(2): 127–146.Google Scholar
  71. Verhaegen, S., M. Hooghe, and E. Quintelier. 2014. European identity and support for European integration: A matter of perceived economic benefits? Kyklos: International Review of Social Sciences 67(2): 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weßels, B. 2007. Discontent and European identity: Three types of Euroscepticism. Acta Politica 42(2): 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zürn, M. 2000. Democratic governance beyond the Nation-State: The EU and other international institutions. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations