Understanding shifts in voting behaviour away from and towards radical right populist parties: The case of the PVV between 2007 and 2012

Original Paper

Abstract

Over the last few decades, radical right populist (RRP) parties have been electorally successful in different European countries. The success of some of these parties has, however, not been stable. Some RRP parties have indeed been successful at some elections but experienced substantive electoral losses in subsequent elections. The aim of our study is to test the extent to which changes in political attitudes during an electoral cycle relate to the likelihood of voters to switch their voting intentions from any party to a RRP party and from a RRP party to any other party. Taking advantage of Dutch panel data (LISS) collected in 2007, 2010 and 2012 (N = 1,494 for 2007–2010; N = 2,126 for 2010–2012), our binary logistic regression analyses indicate that growing sympathy for the party leader (Geert Wilders) initiates a move to the PVV while decreasing sympathy for Geert Wilders relates to a shift away from the PVV. Changes in attitudes towards immigrants, Euroscepticism and political inefficacy and distrust, do not seem to matter when mean levels for these attitudes are controlled for.

Keywords

radical right populism volatility PVV party leader change in party preference the Netherlands 

References

  1. Aardal, B. and Binder, T. (2011) Leader effects and party characteristics. In: K. Aarts, A. Blais and H. Schmitt, (eds.) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 108–126.Google Scholar
  2. Aarts, K. and Thomassen, J. (2008) Dutch voters and the changing party space 1989–2006. Acta Politica 43: 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarts, K., Blais, A. and Schmitt, H. (eds.). (2011) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (2008) Introduction: The sceptre and the spectre. In: D. Albertazzi and D. McDonnell, eds., Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre and the Sceptre. London: Palgrave, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison, P.D. (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology 20: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andeweg, R.B. (1982) Dutch Voters Adrift; on Explanations of Electoral Change (19631977). Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar
  7. Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 18851985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bittner, A. (2011) Platform or Personality?: The Role of Party Leaders in Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S., Lampert, R., Kay, B. and Curtis, J. (1988) In the eye of the beholder: Leader images in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 21: 729–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coffé, H. (2005) Do individual factors explain the different success of the two Belgian extreme right parties? Acta Politica 40(1): 74–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coffé, H. (2008) (Small) entrepreneurs first! Analysis of the economic discourse of the Vlaams Belang. Journal of Language and Politics 7(1): 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, R. (2008) Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M. (2000) Parties Without Partisans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dalton, R. and Weldon, S.A. (2005) Public images of political parties: A necessary evil? West European Politics 28(5): 931–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dassonville, R. (2012) Electoral volatility, political sophistication, trust and efficacy: A study on changes in voter preferences during the Belgian regional elections of 2009. Acta Politica 47(1): 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Lange, S.L. and Art, D. (2011) Fortuyn versus wilders: An agency-based approach to radical right party building. West European Politics 34(6): 1229–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eatwell, R. (2003) Ten theories of the extreme right. In: P. Merkl and L. Weinberg, (eds.) Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, G. and Andersen, R. (2005) The impact of party leaders: How blair lost labour votes. Parliamentary Affairs 58: 818–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fennema, M. (2010) Geert Wilders: De Tovenaarsleerlng. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher, M., Laver, M. and Mair, P. (2006) Representative Government in Modern Europe. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Garzia, D. (2011a) The personalization of politics in western democracies: Causes and consequences on leader-follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly 22: 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garzia, D. (2011b) Changing Parties. Changing Partisans. The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands. GESIS-Working Papers 2011/12. Bonn: Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  23. Holmberg, S. and Oscarsson, H. (2011) Party leader effects on the vote. In: K. Aarts, A. Blais and H. Schmitt, (eds.) Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
  24. Ivarsflaten, E. (2005) The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their economic success. European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitschelt, H. (2007) Growth and persistence of the radical right in postindustrial democracies: Advances and challenges in comparative research. West European Politics 30(5): 1176–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhn, U. (2009) Stability and change in party preference. Swiss Political Science Review 15(3): 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lachat, R. (2007) A Heterogeneous Electorate: Political Sophistication, Predisposition Strength and the Voting Decision Process. Baden Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M. and Scheepers, P. (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41: 345–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mair, P. (2008) Electoral volatility and the dutch party system: A comparative perspective. Acta Politica 43(2/3): 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McAllister, I. (2007) The personalization of politics. In: R.J. Dalton and H.D. Klingemann, (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–588.Google Scholar
  32. Mudde, C. (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norris, P. (2005) Radical Right. Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pauwels, T. (2011) Explaining the strange decline of the populist radical right Vlaams Belang in Belgium: The impact of permanent opposition. Acta Politica 46(1): 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pedersen, M.N. (1979) The dynamics of european party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, K.M. and Wibbels, E. (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: A test of economic, institutional, and structural explanations. The American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rydgren, J. (2007) The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schumacher, G. and Rooduijn, M. (2013) Sympathy for the ‘Devil’? Voting for populist in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch general elections. Electoral Studies 32: 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Searing, D. D., Writhg, G. and Rabinowitz, G. (1976) The primacy principle: Attitude change and political socialization. British Journal of Political Science 6: 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taggart, P. (2000) Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tavits, M. (2005) The development of stable party support: Electoral dynamics in postcommunist europe. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tavits, M. (2008) On the linkage between electoral volatility and party system instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 47: 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. TNS, 2012. Evaluation of the 2012 Dutch Elections. Amsterdam: TNS.Google Scholar
  44. Tóka, G. and Gosselin, T. (2010) Persistent political divides, electoral volatility and citizen involvement: The freezing hypothesis in the 2004 European election. West European Politics 33 (3): 609–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tverdova, Y.V. 2011. Follow the party or follow the leader? candidate evaluations, party evaluations, and macropolitical context. In: R.J. Dalton and C.J. Anderson, (eds.) Citizens, Context, and Choice. How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 126–148.Google Scholar
  46. Van den Berg, J. and Coffé, H. (2012) Educational and class cleavages in voting behavior in Belgium: The effect of income, EGP Class and education on party choice in Flanders and Wallonia. Acta Politica 47(2): 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van den Berg, J. and De Beer, T. (2013) Het Vertrouwde Nest: Gedragsmodellen Onderschatten Macht Der Gewoonte. CLOU 63: 38–39.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M. and Tillie, J. (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest votes? European Journal of Political Research 37(1): 77–102.Google Scholar
  49. Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M. and Tillie, J. (2005) Why some anti-immigrant parties fails and others succeed. A two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies 28(5): 537–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van der Brug, W. and Mughan, A. (2007) Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics 13(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van der Meer, T., Lubbe, R., Van Elsas, E., Elff, M. and Van der Brug, W. (2012) Bounded volatility in the Dutch electoral battlefield: A panel study on the structure of changing vote intentions in the netherlands during 2006–2010. Acta Politica 47: 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2011) The Dutch Parliamentary election of 2010. West European Politics 34(2): 412–419Google Scholar
  53. Van Holsteyn, J. and Andeweg, R. (2010) Demoted leaders and exiled candidates. Disentangling party and person in the voter’s mind. Electoral Studies 29: 628–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Kessel, S. (2013). A matter of supply and demand: The electoral performance of populist parties in three European countries. Government and Opposition 48(2): 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Kessel, S. and Hollander, S. (2012) Europe and the Dutch Parliamentary Election, September 2012. Election Briefing No. 71. Brighton: European Parties Elections and Referendums Network (University of Sussex).Google Scholar
  56. Van Praag, P. (2013) De Invloed Van Peilingen op de Campagneverslaglegging. Beleid en Maatschappij 40(2): 201–204.Google Scholar
  57. Vossen, K. (2010) Populism in the Netherlands after Fortuyn: Rita Verdonk and Geert wilders compared. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 11(1): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vossen, K. (2011) Classifying wilders: The ideological development of Geert Wilders and his party for freedom. Politics 31(1): 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Werts, H., Scheepers, P. and Lubbers, M. (2013) Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right. European Union Politics 14(2): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zelle, C. (1995) Social dealignment versus political frustration: Contrasting explanations of the floating vote in Germany. European Journal of Political Research 27(3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of Wellington - Political Science & International Relations ProgrammeWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.TNS NIPO/Kantar PublicAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations