Skip to main content
Log in

Does Corruption Discourage More Female Entrepreneurs from Applying for Credit?

  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is evidence of a gender gap in access to finance. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that corruption discourages more female than male entrepreneurs from applying for credit. We use data on access to credit and corruption at the firm level for a large dataset of firms from 68 countries worldwide. We demonstrate that female entrepreneurs are more discouraged by corruption to ask for credit than male borrowers. We find evidence for two explanations for the gendered impact of corruption on borrower discouragement: women have less experience in management than men and as such can have less experience to deal with corruption, and gender inequality in society enhances the discouragement of female borrowers. Thus, our findings provide evidence that corruption enhances the gender gap in access to finance, enhancing gender inequality in participation in economic activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Rivas (2013, p. 2) predicts that “it may be just a matter of time until women get involved in corrupt activities.”

  2. The correlation between the perception of corruption and obstacles in access to finance is 0.19 and highly significant.

  3. As explained by Kai and Prabhala (2007, p. 45), “Strictly speaking, exclusion restrictions are not necessary in the Heckman selection model because the model is identified by non-linearity.” Hence, we use the same set of variables in our selection equation and regression equation.

  4. Countries in the panel data: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Georgia, Kosovo, Lebanon, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.

  5. The fixed effects model provides the same conclusions.

References

  • Alesina, A.F., F. Lotti, and P.E. Mistrulli. 2013. Do women pay more for credit? Evidence from Italy. Journal of the European Economic Association 11(suppl_1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiedu, E., J.A. Freeman, and A. Nti-Addae. 2012. Access to credit by small businesses: How relevant are race, ethnicity, and gender? American Economic Review 102(3): 532–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., M. Belitski, and C. Brush. 2020. Innovation in women-led firms: An empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, T.D., and E. Beaulieu. 2019. Women politicians, institutions, and perceptions of corruption. Comparative Political Studies 52(1): 134–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., and A. Demirgüç-Kunt. 2006. Small and medium-size enterprises: access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance 30(11): 2931–2943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt, and D. Singer. 2013. Is small beautiful? Financial structure, size and access to finance. World Development 52: 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci, A., A. Borisov, and A. Zazzaro. 2010. Does gender matter in bank–firm relationships? Evidence from small business lending. Journal of Banking and Finance 34(12): 2968–2984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermpei, T., A.N. Kalyvas, and L. Leonida. 2021. Local public corruption and bank lending activity in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics 171(1): 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S.M., J.P. Robinson, and M.A. Milke. 2006. The changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J.P., D.C. Miller, and W.D. Schafer. 1999. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125(3): 367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, V. 2018. Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making 13(4): 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S.L., and E. Shaw. 2006. Women's business ownership: Recent research and policy developments. Retrieved from Small Business Service Research Report. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/8962.

  • Cavalluzzo, K.S., L.C. Cavalluzzo, and J.D. Wolken. 2002. Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. The Journal of Business 75(4): 641–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S., and M. Xiang. 2013. The international evidence on discouraged small businesses. Journal of Empirical Finance 20: 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R.A., and H. Mehran. 2018. Gender and the availability of credit to privately held firms: evidence from the surveys of small business finances. FRB of New York staff report(383).

  • Coleman, S. 2000. Access to capital and terms of credit: A comparison of men-and women-owned small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 38(3): 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., and U. Gneezy. 2009. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2): 448–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Andrés, P., R. Gimeno, and R.M. de Cabo. 2020. The gender gap in bank credit access. Journal of Corporate Finance 89: 101782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., R. Fisman, and R. Gatti. 2001. Are women really the “fairer” sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46(4): 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H., and W. Wood. 2016. Social role theory of sex differences. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies 25: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esarey, J., and G. Chirillo. 2013. Fairer sex” or purity myth? Corruption, gender, and institutional context. Politics and Gender 9(4): 361–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabowale, L., B. Orser, and A. Riding. 1995. Gender, structural factors, and credit terms between Canadian small businesses and financial institutions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 19(4): 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., and J. Svensson. 2007. Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. Journal of Development Economics 83(1): 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fungáčová, Z., A. Kochanova, and L. Weill. 2015. Does money buy credit? Firm-level evidence on bribery and bank debt. World Development 68: 308–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, E., D.V. Mascia, and S.P.S. Rossi. 2018. Does corruption influence the self-restraint attitude of women-led SMEs towards bank lending? CESifo Economic Studies 64(3): 426–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gama, A.P.M., F.D. Duarte, and J.P. Esperança. 2017. Why discouraged borrowers exist? An empirical (re) examination from less developed countries. Emerging Markets Review 33: 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosch, K., and H.A. Rau. 2017. Gender differences in honesty: The role of social value orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology 62: 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFC. 2011. Strengthening access to finance for women owned SMEs in developing countries. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/publications_report_accesstofinanceforwomensmes.

  • Kai, L., and N.R. Prabhala. 2007. Self-selection models in corporate finance. In Handbook of empirical corporate finance, 37–86. Elsevier.

  • Mauro, P. 1995. Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méon, P.-G., and L. Weill. 2010. Is corruption an efficient grease? World Development 38(3): 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, A., T.P. Wisniewski, and G.M. Mantovani. 2017. Does a manager’s gender matter when accessing credit? Evidence from European data. Journal of Banking and Finance 80: 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlheusser, G., A. Roider, and N. Wallmeier. 2015. Gender differences in honesty: Groups versus individuals. Economics Letters 128: 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muravyev, A., O. Talavera, and D. Schäfer. 2009. Entrepreneurs’ gender and financial constraints: Evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics 37(2): 270–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naegels, V., N. Mori, and B. D’Espallier. 2018. An institutional view on access to finance by Tanzanian women-owned enterprises. Venture Capital 20(2): 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ongena, S., and A. Popov. 2016. Gender bias and credit access. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 48(8): 1691–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, S., and S. Ongena. 2019. Will money talk? Firm bribery and credit access. Financial Management 48(1): 117–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinby, J., and M. Chene. 2016. Gender and corruption: Topic guide. Transparency International.

  • Rivas, M.F. 2013. An experiment on corruption and gender. Bulletin of Economic Research 65(1): 10–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spamann, H. 2019. On inference when using state corporate laws for identification. Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper(1024).

  • Statnik, J.-C., and T.L.G. Vu. 2020. Does corruption impact the demand for bank credit? A study of discouraged borrowers in Asian developing countries. Finance 41(3): 7–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefani, M.L., and V.P. Vacca. 2013 Credit access for female firms: Evidence from a survey on European SMEs. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper(176).

  • Stock, J.H., and M. Yogo. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg, 80(4.2), 1.

  • Swamy, A., S. Knack, Y. Lee, and O. Azfar. 2001. Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics 64(1): 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., and N.T. Valev. 2010. Gender and public attitudes toward corruption and tax evasion. Contemporary Economic Policy 28(4): 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treichel, M.Z., and J.A. Scott. 2006. Women-owned businesses and access to bank credit: Evidence from three surveys since 1987. Venture Capital 8(1): 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellalage, N.H., S. Locke, and H. Samujh. 2019. Corruption, gender and credit constraints: Evidence from South Asian SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics 159(1): 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous referees for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Weill.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 11 Definitions of variables

11.

Appendix 2

See Table

Table 12 List of countries in the sample

12.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Statnik, JC., Vu, TLG. & Weill, L. Does Corruption Discourage More Female Entrepreneurs from Applying for Credit?. Comp Econ Stud 65, 1–28 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-022-00184-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-022-00184-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation