Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data

  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An alternative course to Brexit for the UK is evaluated. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the UK would have been better off had, instead of Brexit, remained in the EU and joined the Eurozone. The model specification is based on the neoclassical theory of growth extended to include human capital accumulation. Counterfactual analysis in terms of the difference-in-differences methodology is applied to evaluate the effect in UK’s per capita income if the UK had joined the Eurozone when the Eurozone was formed. The dataset is a balanced panel of annual observations for fifteen countries and covers the period from 1980 to 2017. The analysis reveals that had the UK joined the Eurozone, UK’s per capita income would have been 15.48% higher on the average for the period after the formation of the Eurozone. This effect increases to 24.98% if Eurozone’s less performing economies of the southern periphery are excluded from the analysis. The study shows that Brexit is a move toward the wrong direction. The UK should have sought further integration with the EU in terms of presence in the Eurozone than pursue Brexit and leave the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler-Nissen, R., C. Charlotte Galpin, and B. Rosamond. 2017. Performing Brexit: How a Post-Brexit World is Imagined Outside the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3): 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. 1996. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. NBER, Working Paper No. 5698.

  • Barro, R., and J.-W. Lee. 2013. A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics 104: 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I. 2017. Making Sense of the Costs and Benefits of Brexit: Challenges for Economists. Atlantic Economic Journal 45: 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., and R. Gurkaynak. 2001. Is Growth Exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil Seriously. NBER, Working Paper No. 8365. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8365.pdf.

  • Booth, S., C. Howarth, M. Persson, R. Ruparel, and P. Swidlicki. 2015. What If…? The Consequences, Challenges and oPportunities Facing Britain Outside EU. Open Europe 3: 1–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breinlich, H., S. Dhingra, T. Sampson, and J. Van Reenen. 2016. Who bears the pain? How the costs of Brexit would be distributed across income groups. CEP Brexit Analysis No. 7. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/brexit07.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018.

  • Breton, T. 2013. Were Mankiw, Romer and Weil Right? A Reconciliation of the Micro and Macro Effects of Schooling on Income. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17: 1023–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burhan, N.A.S., M.R. Mohamad, Y. Kurniawan, and A.H. Sidek. 2014. The Impact of Low, Average, and High IQ on Economic Growth and Technological Progress: Do All Individuals Contribute Equally? Intelligence 46: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, N.F. (2019). B for Brexit: A Survey of the Economics Academic Literature. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, DP No. 12134. http://ftp.iza.org/dp12134.pdf.

  • Campos, N.F., F. Coricelli, and L. Moretti. 2014. Economic Growth and Political Integration: Estimating the Benefits from Membership in the European Union Using the Synthetic Counterfactuals Method. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, DP No. 8162. http://ftp.iza.org/dp12134.pdf.

  • Campos, N.F., F. Coricelli, and L. Moretti. 2019. Institutional Integration and Economic Growthin Europe. Journal of Monetary Economics 103: 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulopoulou, S. 2014. The Effect of Currency Unions on Business Cycle Correlations: The EMU Case. Empirica 41: 177–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, M. 2014. The Introduction of the Euro and Economic Growth: Some Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Applied Economics 17(2): 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, N. 2016. The growth effects of EU membership for the UK: A review of the evidence. CAGE Online Working Paper Series 280, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy.

  • Dhingra, S., H. Huang, G. Ottaviano, J.P. Pessoa, T. Sampson, and J. Van Reenen. 2017. The Costs and Benefits of Leaving the EU: Trade Effects. Economic Policy 32: 651–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S.N., and D.T. Quah. 1999. The new empirics of economic growth. In Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1, ed. J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford, 235–308. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0048(99)01007-1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebell, M., I. Hurst, and J. Warrena. 2016. Modelling the Long-Run Economic Impact of Leaving the European Union. Economic Modelling 59: 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. 2019. The International Financial Implications of Brexit. International Economics and Economic Policy 16(1): 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertur, C., and K. Wilfried. 2007. Growth, Technological Interdependence and Spacial Externalities: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 1033–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C., R. Inklaar, and M.P. Timmer. 2015. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review 105(10): 3150–3182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M. 2011. A Spatial Mankiw–Romer–Weil Model: Theory and Evidence. Annals of Regional Science 47(2): 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M. 2018. Spatial Externalities and Growth in a Mankiw–Romer–Weil World: Theory and Evidence. International Regional Science Review 41(1): 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves, C.E.S., M. Rodrigues, and T. Soares. 2009. Correlation of Business Cycles in the Euro Zone. Economics Letters 102: 56–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantzsche, A., A. Kara, and G. Young. 2019. The Economic Effects of the UK Government’s Proposed Brexit deal. The World Economy 42(1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J.A. 1978. Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46(6): 1251–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliński, K. 2018. The Economic Consequences of Leaving European Union by Great Britain. Ekonomiai Prawo. Ecomomics and Law 17(2): 157–167. https://doi.org/10.12775/eip.2018.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznar, A., and J. Menkes. 2017. Will the Brexit Cause the Whole Britain to Leave the European Union? Ekonomiai Prawo. Economics and Law 16(4): 433–448. https://doi.org/10.12775/eip.2017.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A., C.-F. Lin, and C.-S. Chu. 2002. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics 108(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, C.-M. 2017. European and International Views of Brexit. European Review 25(4): 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, and D.N. Weil. 1992. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A. 2016. The Potential Implications of a Brexit for Future EU Agri-food Policies. Euro Choices 15(2): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.12128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.D. 1995. Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics 13(2): 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G., J.P. Pessoa, T. Sampson, and J. Van Reenen. 2014. The Costs and Benefits of Leaving the EU, CFS Working Paper, No. 472. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506664.

  • Portes, J., and G. Forte. 2017. The Economic Impact of Brexit-Induced Reductions in Migration. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33(1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. 1994. Returns to Investment in Education: A Global Update. World Development 22(9): 1325–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. 2007. IQ and Economic Growth: Further Augmentation of Mankiw–Romer–Weil Model. Economics Letters 94: 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy 94(5): 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98: 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, T. 2017. Brexit: The Economics of International Disintegration. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 31(4): 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of ECONOMIC Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1): 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., and A. Heston. 1988. A New Set of International Comparisons of Real Product and Price Levels Estimates for 130 Countries, 1950–1985. Review of Income and Wealth 34(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, J. 1999. The New Growth Evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 112–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollaard, H. 2014. Explaining European Disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. 1980. A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4): 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2013. Introductory Econometrics, A Modern Approach. 5th ed. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Nauro F. Campos and an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions that benefitted this work substantially. The author is responsible for any errors or omissions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Liberal Studies, College of Sciences and Liberal Arts, Kettering University, 1700 University Avenue, Flint, MI, 48504, USA

    Petros E. Ioannatos

Authors
  1. Petros E. Ioannatos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petros E. Ioannatos.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 159 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 65 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ioannatos, P.E. Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data. Comp Econ Stud 63, 117–138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-020-00119-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-020-00119-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation