Skip to main content
Log in

The means, motive and opportunity of devolved policy responses to an ecosystem approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘environment’ is a fully devolved concern in UK governance, though the comparative dynamics of devolved environmental governance remain poorly understood. The potential for the repatriation of significant environmental powers from the EU to devolved administrations through Brexit means that the nature of devolved environmental policy-making is increasingly coming under the spotlight. This paper enhances collective understanding about the nature of devolved environmental government and governance by adopting a comparative approach across the devolved nations of the UK. Based upon interviews and policy publications it analyses a number of key policy-making and institutional variables in relation to responses to an international environmental regime. In both Wales and Scotland evidence was found of environmental policy-making, policy-innovation and institution-building that diverged from the UK. Wales, in particular, evidenced how ‘the environment’ appears to be seen as a dynamic space for policy and institutional innovation. These findings highlight how the devolved-scale of governance might be particularly fruitful for environmental policy-innovation when the means, motive and opportunity are evident. It also highlights how key conditions are evident to ensure that devolved agencies may be empowered to undertake radically divergent approaches and programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Reproduced from Scott et al. (2014, p. 28), and National Assembly for Wales (2012)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldock, D., A. Farmer, and M. Nesbit. 2016. Brexit—The implications for UK Environmental Policy and Regulation. London: Report for the All-Party Parliamentary Environment Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsiger, J., and S. VanDeever. 2012. Navigating regional environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 12 (3): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belifore, A., and A.-R. Upchurch. 2013. Humanities in the twenty-first century: Beyond markets and utility. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, D. 2012. Comparing devolved governance. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C., A. Jordan, and V. Garvey. 2016. The EU Referendum and the UK Environment: the Future Under a ‘Hard’ and a ‘Soft’ Brexit. The UK in a changing Europe, 16 Feb 2018, http://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/The-Environment-under-Soft-or-Hard-Brexit.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2017.

  • Cairney, P., and N. McGarvey. 2013. Scottish politics. Edinburgh: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Central Scotland Green Network. 2017. http://www.centralscotlandgreennetwork.org. Retrieved 20 May 2017.

  • Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus. www.cecan.ac.uk. Accessed 3 Feb 2019.

  • Choi, C., C. Turner, and C. Volden. 2002. Means, motive, and opportunity: Politics, community needs, and community oriented policing services grants. American Politics Research 30 (4): 423–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. 2016. The ecosystem approach. Montreal, Canada. https://www.cbd.int/ecosystem. Accessed 3 May 2017.

  • Defra. 2002. Working with the grain of nature: A biodiversity strategy of England. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra. 2007. Securing a healthy natural environment: An action plan for embedding an ecosystems approach. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra. 2011a. The natural choice: Securing the value of nature. London: Defra. Report No: 2433258.

  • Defra. 2011b. Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLucia, V. 2015. Competing narratives and complex genealogies: The ecosystem approach in international environmental law. Journal of Environmental Law 27 (1): 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment Northern Ireland. 2002. Northern Ireland biodiversity strategy. https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk. Accessed 27 May 2017.

  • Elliott, R. and K. Monk. 2014. NEAT Tree case study: Natural Resources Wales. http://neat.ecosystemsknowledge.net/wales.html. Accessed 22 May 2017.

  • Fee, E., K. Gerber, J. Rust, K. Haggenmueller, H. Korn, and P. Ibisch. 2009. Stuck in the clouds: Bringing the CBD’S Ecosystem Approach for conservation management down to Earth in Canada and Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation 17 (4): 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, R., J. Burgess, J. Chilvers, A. Footitt, R. Haines-Young, D. Russel, and M. Winter. 2011. Participatory and deliberative techniques to embed an ecosystems approach into decision making: an introductory guide. London: Defra. Defra Project Code: NR0124.

  • Gibbs, D., and A. Jonas. 2001. Rescaling and regional governance: The English regional development agencies and the environment. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 19 (2): 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D., A. Jonas, and A. While. 2002. Changing governance structures and the environment: economy–environment relations at the local and regional scales. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 4 (2): 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D.C., A.E.G. Jonas, and W. While. 2010. Managing infrastructural and service demands in new economic spaces. The new Territorial Politics of Collective Provision. Regional Studies 44 (2): 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young, R. and M. Potschin. 2008. England’s terrestrial ecosystem services and the rationale for an ecosystem approach. London: Defra. Overview Report 30, Defra Project Code NR0107.

  • Hanf, K., and A.-I. Jansen. 1997. Governance and environment in Western Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. and B. Howard. 2015. Applying the ecosystem approach at the landscape scale: A review of progress and challenges. Ecosystems Knowledge Network report. http://ecosystemsknowledge.net/sites/default/files/wp-content/uploads/EKN_Review_2015_0.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2017.

  • Jenkins R., H. Drewett, N. Bialynicki-Birula, and R. De’Ath. 2015. Delivering Biodiversity through Natural Resource Management. Cardiff: Natural Resources Wales Board Paper NRW B 43.15.

  • Joao, E., and P. Phillips. 2017. Landuse planning and an ecosystem approach: An evaluation of case study planning frameworks against the Malawi principles. Land Use Policy 68: 460–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, J. 1999. An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31: 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M., P. Cairney, and E. Hepburn. 2012. Policy convergence, transfer, and learning in the UK under devolution. Regional & Federal Studies 22 (3): 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, R., and M. Rudd. 2014. A narrative policy approach to environmental conservation. Ambio 43 (7): 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann, M., and D. Montgomery. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal 9 (51): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assembly for Wales Sustainability Comittee. 2011. Inquiry into Biodiversity in Wales. www.assembly.wales/Laid%20Documents/CR-LD8384%20-%20Sustainability%20Committee%20Inquiry%20into%20biodiversity%20in%20Wales-31012011-208859/cr-ld8384-e-English.pdf.

  • National Assembly for Wales. 2012. An Introduction to natural environment policy in Wales and a comparison with natural environment policies for other parts of the UK. http://www.assembly.wales/Research%20Documents/An%20Introduction%20to%20natural%20environment%20policy%20in%20Wales%20and%20a%20comparison%20with%20natural%20environment%20policies%20for%20o-21052012-234098/12-018-English.pdf.

  • Natural Scotland. 2011. Applying an ecosystems approach to landuse: an introductory note. Edinburgh: Natural Scotland. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/345453/0114927.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018.

  • Natural England. 2014. Corporate plan 2014–2019. London: Natural England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural England. 2016. Natural England conservation strategy 2016. London: Natural England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern Ireland Department of Environment. 2015. Valuing Nature: A biodiversity strategy for Northern Ireland. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/gb/gb-nbsap-v3-p3-en.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2017.

  • Österblom, H., A. Gårdmarkc, L. Bergströmc, B. Müller-Karulisd, C. Folke, M. Lindegrenf, M. Casinig, P. Olsson, R. Diekmann, T. Blencknera, C. Humborga, and C. Möllmannh. 2010. Making the ecosystem approach operational—Can regime shifts in ecological governance systems facilitate the transition. Marine Policy 34 (6): 1290–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, S. 2016. An evaluation framework for applying the ecosystem approach. Scottish Natural Heritage. http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/A1933741.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2017.

  • Porter, J., L. Jagota, J. Brookes, P. Mahony, B. Howard, R. Waters, and D. Hunt. 2014. Ecosystem approach handbook. London: Defra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potschin, M., R. Haines‐Young, and R. Fish. 2011. Embedding an ecosystems approach in decision making: Measuring the added value. Report for Defra, Project Code NR0135, CEM 18 53.

  • Rosario Ortiz Quijano, M. 2014. CBDA implementation analysis. London: UKGOV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, D., and A. Jordan. 2009. Joining up or pulling apart? The use of appraisal to coordinate policy making for sustainable development. Environment and Planning A 41 (5): 1201–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., C. Carter, O. Hölzinger, M. Everard, D. Rafaelli, M. Hardman, J. Baker, J. Glass, K. Leach, R. Wakeford, M. Reed, M. Grace, T. Sunderland, R. Waters, R. Corstanje, R. Glass, N. Grayson, J. Harris, and A. Taft. 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow—On. Work Package Report 10: Tools—Applications, benefits and linkages for ecosystem science. UNEP—WCMC, LWEC, UK.

  • Scottish Environment Link. 2011. Scotland’s environmental laws since devolution—from rhetoric to reality. Edinburgh: Scottish Environment Link.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. 2004. Scotland’s Biodiversity: It’s in your hands. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2004/05/19366/37239. Accessed 13 Dec 2016.

  • Scottish Government. 2016. Landuse strategy 2016–2021. Policy paper SG/2016/6. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

  • Scottish Government. 2013. 2020 challenge for Scotland’s Biodiversity. Policy paper. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.

  • Scottish Natural Heritage. 2012. Making the most of communities’ natural assets: Green infrastructure. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2012/09/8724. Accessed 14 May 2017.

  • Scottish Natural Heritage. 2016. An ecosystem approach to marine planning—a summary of selected tools, examples & guidance. http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/A1974249.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2017.

  • Shepard, G. 2008. The ecosystem approach: learning from experience, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural resources. International Union for the Conservation of Nature Ecosystem management series number five. Gland: Switzerland.

  • Smith, R., and E. Maltby. 2003. Using the ecosystem approach to implement the convention on biological diversity. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Gland: Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Denny, E. 2016. What does it mean for public policy to be made in Wales? British politics and policy blog. LSE online. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/what-does-it-mean-for-public-policy-to-be-made-in-wales/. Accessed 13 May 2018.

  • Trench, A. 2005. Introduction: The dynamics of devolution. In The dynamics of devolution: The state of nations, ed. A. Trench. London: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. 2013. Omitting to effective climate governance in Northern Ireland: A defining test of devolution. Journal of Environmental Law 25 (2): 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R, J. Lusardi, and S. Clarke. 2012. Delivering the ecosystem approach on the ground—An evaluation of the upland ecosystem service pilots. Natural England Research Report 046. London: Defra.

  • Waylen, K., E. Hastings, E. Banks, K. Holstead, R. Irvine, and K. Blackstock. 2014. The need to disentangle key concepts from ecosystem approach jargon. Conservation Biology 28 (5): 1215–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, K., K. Blackstock, and K. Holstead. 2015. How does legacy create sticking points for environmental management? Insights from challenges to implementation of the ecosystem approach. Ecology and Society. Art. 21.

  • Welsh Government. 2016. Natural Resources Policy Statement. https://gweddill.gov.wales/docs/desh/publications/170821-natural-resourcespolicy-en.PDF.

  • Wentworth, J. 2011. The ecosystem approach. House of Commons Postnote, 377.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Kirsop-Taylor.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirsop-Taylor, N. The means, motive and opportunity of devolved policy responses to an ecosystem approach. Br Polit 15, 349–368 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019-00119-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019-00119-2

Keywords

Navigation