Science diplomacy and transnational governance impact
- 110 Downloads
Science diplomacy is coming to the fore as a formidable dimension of interstate power relations. As the challenges of the world increasingly transcend borders, so too have researchers and innovators forged international coalitions to resolve global pathologies. In doing so, new channels of influence and opportunity have opened up for states alongside the ‘traditional’ modes of foreign diplomacy. Understanding how these channels influence global socio-economic outcomes is thereby crucial for scholars interested in the still-ambiguous structure and processes of global governance. This article advances understanding of the domains of science diplomacy by drawing attention to the ‘political intercostalities’ of state actors, scientific communities and other transnational actors within the new architectures of global governance. Here we trace the growing array of informal international associations alongside transgovernmental policy networks and ‘global public-policy partnerships’ that deal with highly specialised and technical matters of international policy and how they are drawn into science diplomacy. This article thus presents a research agenda for a particular mode of ‘impact’ in politics and international studies.
KeywordsScience diplomacy Global governance Evidence-based Policy network Research translation
- Arkin, Fatima. 2015. South Korea pushes the envelope in science diplomacy’, SciDevNet. http://www.scidev.net/asia-pacific/science-diplomacy/feature/south-korea-pushes-the-envelope-in-science-diplomacy.html.
- Banerjee, A., A. Deaton, N. Lustig, and K. Rogoff. 2006. An evaluation of World Bank research, 1998–2005.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. 2003. Science et société: les trois traductions. Cahiers du Mouvement Universel de la Responsabilité Scientifique, 57–69.Google Scholar
- Davis, Lloyd S., and Robert G. Patman (eds.). 2015. Science diplomacy: New day or false dawn. New York: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- EL-CSID, European Leadership in Cultural, Science and Innovation Policy. http://www.el-csid.eu/.
- European Commission. 2014. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, the European Economic and Social committee and the Committee of the Regions: Report on the implementation of the strategy for international cooperation in research and innovation, COM(2014) 567 final, 11th September, Brussels, European Commission.Google Scholar
- Fähnrich, B. 2015. Science diplomacy: Investigating the perspective of scholars on politics–science collaboration in international affairs. Public Understanding of Science, 0963662515616552.Google Scholar
- Grimes, R., and C. McNulty. 2016. The newton fund: Science and innovation for development and diplomacy, science and diplomacy, 30th December. http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2016/newton-fund-science-and-innovation-for-development-and-diplomacy.
- Gluckman, Peter. 2016. Science advice to governments: An emerging dimension of science diplomacy. Science & Diplomacy 5(2). http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2016/science-advice-governments.
- Horizon 2020. 2017. FET flagship model. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/fet-flagship-model-implementation-and-governance-model-horizon-2020-short-overview-presentation. Accessed 3 Jan 2017.
- Hormats, Robert D. 2012. Science diplomacy and twenty-first century statecraft. Science & Diplomacy 1(1). http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2012/science-diplomacy-and-twenty-first-century-statecraft.
- Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Keukeleire, S., F. Keuleers, and K. Raube. 2016. The EU, structural diplomacy and the challenge of learning. In The diplomatic system of the European Union. Evolution, change and challenges, ed. M. Smith, S. Keukeleire, and S. Vanhoonacker. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Littoz-Monnet, A. (ed.). 2017. The politics of expertise in international organizations: How international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Moran, M., and Stone, D. 2016. The new philanthropy: Private power in international development policy?. In The Palgrave handbook of international development, 297–313. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
- Nye Jr., Joseph. 2005. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
- Pal, Leslie. 2016. Global policy advisory systems: Patterns, trajectories and impacts. New York: Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Pamment, James. 2013. New public diplomacy in the 21st century: A comparative study of policy and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Royal Society. 2010. New frontiers in science diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
- Stoker, Gerry, Peters, B. Guy, and Jon Pierre. 2014. In The relevance of political science, eds. Gerry Stoker, B. Guy Peters, and Jon Pierre. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
- The Royal Society. 2010. New frontiers in science diplomacy navigating the changing balance of power. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. 2015. Science diplomacy and transboundary water management: the Orontes River case. Venice: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
- Union of International Associations (Ed.). 2013. Yearbook of International Organizations 2013–2014. Brill Academic Pub.Google Scholar
- Vabulas, Felicity. 2018. The administration of informal intergovernmental organisations. In Global policy and transnational administration, ed. Diane Stone, and Kim Moloney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Van Langenhove, Luk. 2016. Multilateral EU action through science diplomacy. In The EU global strategy: Going beyond effective multilateralism?, ed. Balazs Ujvari. Brussels: European Policy Center.Google Scholar