Anderson, K., and S.J. Smith. 2001. Emotional geographies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (1): 7–10.
ATSE. Research engagement for Australia: Measuring research engagement between universities and end users. 2006. Retrieved April 19, 2017. https://www.atse.org.au/Documents/reports/research-engagement-australia-summary-report.pdf.
Ball, S.J. 2012. Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (1): 17–28.
Beaumont, J., M. Loopmans, and J. Uitermark. 2005. Politicization of research and the relevance of geography: Some experiences and reflections for an on-going debate. Area 37 (2): 118–126.
Bekelman, J.E., Y. Li, and C.P. Gross. 2003. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA 289 (4): 454–465.
Bexley, E., R. James, and S. Arkoudis. 2011. The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Bodenheimer, T. 2000. Uneasy alliance: Clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. The New England Journal of Medicine 342: 1539–1544.
Bok, D. 1984. Beyond the ivory tower. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Braben, D., J.F. Allen, W. Amos, M. Ashburner, J. Ashmore, T. Birkhead, et al. 2009. Only scholarly freedom delivers real ‘impact’ 1: An open letter to Research Councils UK. Times Higher Education. Retrieved March 5, 2015. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=408984.
Brewer, J. 2013. The public value of the social sciences: An interpretive essay. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Cherney, A., B. Head, P. Boreham, J. Povey, and M. Ferguson. 2013. Research utilization in the social sciences a comparison of five academic disciplines in Australia. Science Communication 35 (6): 780–809.
Chubb, J.A. Instrumentalism and epistemic responsibility: Researchers and the impact agenda in the UK and Australia. PhD Thesis, University of York, 2017.
Chubb, J., and M. Reed. 2017. Epistemic responsibility as an edifying force in academic research: Investigating the moral challenges and opportunities of an impact agenda in the UK and Australia. Palgrave Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0023-2.
Chubb, J., and R. Watermeyer. 2016. Artifice or integrity in the marketization of research impact? Investigating the moral economy of (pathways to) impact statements within research funding proposals in the UK and Australia. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1144182.
Cook, T., J. Boote, N. Buckley, S. Vougioukalou, and M. Wright. 2017. Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: Developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research 25 (4): 473–488.
Cuthill, M., E. O’Shea, B. Wilson, and P. Viljoen. 2014. Universities and the public good: A review of knowledge exchange policy and related university practice in Australia. Australian Universities’ Review 56 (2): 36–46.
Deci, E.L. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18 (1): 105.
Docherty, T. 2014. Thomas Docherty on academic freedom. Times Higher Education. Retrieved March 5, 2015. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/thomas-docherty-on-academic-freedom/2017268.article.
Donovan, C. 2009. Gradgrinding the social sciences: The politics of metrics of political science. Political Studies Review 7 (1): 73–83.
Eddy, E. Australian Higher Education Modernisation: Enterprise bargaining and the changing basis of academic ‘autonomy’. In Paper presented to the Australasian Political Science Studies Association, September 29–October 1, 2003. Hobart: University of Tasmania, 2003.
Evans, R. 2016. Achieving and evidencing research ‘impact’? Tensions and dilemmas from an ethic of care perspective. Area 48 (2): 213–221.
Frodeman, R. 2017. The impact agenda and the search for a good life. Palgrave Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.3.
Frodeman, R., and J. Parker. 2009. Intellectual merit and broader impact: The National Science Foundation’s broader impacts criterion and the question of peer review. Social Epistemology 23 (3–4): 337–345.
Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gibbs, A. 2016. Academic freedom in international higher education: Right or responsibility? Ethics and Education 11 (2): 175–185.
Graham, G. Universities, the recovery of an idea. Societas Book 1. London: Imprint Academic, 2002.
Haldane, Lord. Report of the Machinery of Government Committee (Haldane Report), cmd. 9230. London: Ministry of Reconstruction, 1918.
Hill, S. In response: Do REF cycles really encourage ‘poorer quality research’? Times Higher Education (2018). Retrieved January 31, 2018. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/response-do-ref-cycles-really-encourage-poorer-quality-research.
Holbrook, J.B., and R. Frodeman. 2011. Peer review and the ex-ante assessment of societal impacts. Research Evaluation 20 (3): 239–246.
Holmwood, J. 2011. The ideas of a public university. A Manifesto for the Public University, 12–26.
Krimsky, S., L.S. Rothenberg, P. Stott, and G. Kyle. 1998. Scientific journals and their authors’ financial interests: A pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 67 (4–5): 194–201.
Ladyman, J. Scientists call for a revolt against grant rule they claim will end blue skies research. Times Higher Education (2009). Retrieved March 5, 2015. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/405350.article.
Locke, E.A., and G.P. Latham. 2002. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 57 (9): 705.
Marcella, R., H. Lockerbie, L. Bloice, C. Hood, and F. Barton. 2017. The effects of the research excellence framework research impact agenda on early- and mid-career researchers in library and information science. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517724685.
Marginson, S., and M. Considine. 2000. The enterprise university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, R. 2001. Geography and public policy: The case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 25 (2): 189–210.
Naidoo, R. 2003. Repositioning higher education as a global commodity: Opportunities and challenges for future sociology of education work. British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (2): 249–259.
Oancea, A. 2013. Interpretations of research impact in seven disciplines. European Educational Research Journal 12 (2): 242–250.
Oancea, A., T. Florez-Petour, and J. Atkinson. 2017. Qualitative network analysis tools for the configurative articulation of cultural value and impact from research. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx014.
Pain, Rachel, Kye Askins, Sarah Banks, Tina Cook, Grace Crawford, Lee Crookes, Stella Derby, Jill Heslop, Yvonne Robinson, and Dave Vanderhoven. Mapping Alternative Impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research. Project Report. Durham University, 2015.
Pollard, J., N. Henry, J. Bryson, and P. Daniels. 2000. Shades of grey? Geographers and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25 (2): 243–248.
Pressman, L. 1999. AUTM licensing survey: FY 1999. Northbrook, IL: Association of University Technology Managers.
RCUK. Research Councils UK webpage. 2017. Retrieved April 20. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/.
Rennie, D. 1997. Thyroid storm. JAMA 277: 1238–1243.
Reed, M.S. The research impact handbook. Fast track impact. 2016. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/04/10/book-review-the-research-impact-handbook-by-mark-reed/.
Reed, M.S., and L. Meagher. 2018. Environment and sustainability. In What Works Now? Evidence-based policy and practice revisited, ed. A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser, and S. Nutley. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Rhoads, R.A., and C.A. Torres, ed. 2006. The university, state, and market: The political economy of globalization in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rogers, A., C. Bear, M. Hunt, S. Mills, and R. Sandover. 2014. Intervention: The impact agenda and human geography in UK higher education. ACME 13 (1): 1–9.
Russell, B. 1996. In praise of idleness and other essays. London: Routledge.
Samuel, G.N., and G.E. Derrick. 2015. Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014. Research Evaluation 24 (3): 229–241.
Sanderson, I. 2002. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 80 (1): 1–22.
Smith, K.E., and E. Stewart. 2017. We need to talk about impact: Why social policy academics need to engage with the UK’s research impact agenda. Journal of Social Policy 46 (1): 109–127.
Stern, N. 2016. Building on success and learning from experience: An independent review of the research excellence framework. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/541338/ind16-9-ref-stern-review.pdf.
Terämä, E., M. Smallman, S.J. Lock, C. Johnson, and M.Z. Austwick. 2016. Beyond academia–Interrogating research impact in the research excellence framework. PloS One 11 (12): e0168533.
Warry, P. 2006. Increasing the economic impact of the Research Councils (the Warry report). Swindon: Research Council UK.
Watermeyer, R. 2014. Issues in the articulation of ‘impact’: The responses of UK academics to ‘impact’ as a new measure of research assessment. Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 359–377.
Watermeyer, R. 2016. Impact in the REF: Issues and obstacles. Studies in Higher Education 41 (2): 199–214.
Watermeyer, R., and A. Hedgecoe. 2016. Selling ‘impact’: Peer reviewer projections of what is needed and what counts in REF impact case studies. A retrospective analysis. Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 651–665.
Wilsdon, J., et al. 2015. The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. London: HEFCE.
Wise. WonkHE blog, 2016. Retrieved November 8, 2017. http://wonkhe.com/blogs/analysis-bills-known-and-loved/.