Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Conservative Party’s leadership election of 2016: choosing a leader in government

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper examines the British Conservative Party’s leadership election of 2016, held in the aftermath of the UK’s referendum vote to leave the European Union. The paper analyses the contest using Stark’s theoretical framework, which assumes that leaders are chosen according to a hierarchy of criteria: acceptability, electability and competence, in that order. The eventual victor, Theresa May, was indeed the strongest candidate on all three criteria. However, electability appeared subordinate to competence during the contest. Electability is usually regarded as more basic than competence because parties must first win elections before they can start governing. However, governing parties are already in office and new leaders chosen mid-term must begin governing immediately. Current competence in office may be a prerequisite for future electability. The paper reviews other post-war leadership elections in Britain and finds that competence normally superseded electability as a selection criterion in governing parties. This finding implies a modification of Stark’s framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I thank an anonymous referee for this point.

  2. I thank an anonymous referee for this point.

  3. I thank an anonymous referee for this point.

References

  • Alderman, K. 1996. The Conservative Party leadership election of 1995. Parliamentary Affairs 49 (2): 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, K. 1999. Revision of leadership election procedures in the Conservative Party. Parliamentary Affairs 52 (2): 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, K., and N. Carter. 1991. A very Tory coup: The ousting of Mrs Thatcher. Parliamentary Affairs 44 (2): 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, K., and N. Carter. 2002. The Conservative Party leadership election of 2001. Parliamentary Affairs 55 (4): 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N. 2011. Labour’s third term: A tale of two prime ministers. In Britain at the polls 2010, ed. N. Allen, and J. Bartle, 1–36. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T. 2010. The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T. 2012. The Conservatives since 1945: The drivers of party change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith, K. 2015. Before prime minister: Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkel, and gendered party leadership contests. Politics & Gender 11 (4): 718–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., and G. Butler. 2011. British political facts, 10th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H., M. Goodwin, and P. Whiteley. 2017. Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerell, M. 2016. David Cameron and Boris Johnson: The friends who fell out. Guardian, 22 June.

  • Cohen, N. 2016. Boris Johnson: Everything about you is phoney. Spectator, 22 February. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/boris-johnson-everything-phoney/. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • Cowley, P., and M. Bailey. 2000. Peasants’ uprising or religious war? Re-examining the 1975 Conservative leadership contest. British Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 599–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, P., and J. Garry. 1998. The British Conservative Party and Europe: The choosing of John Major. British Journal of Political Science 28 (3): 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W., and A. Blais. 2012. Politics at the centre: The selection and removal of party leaders in the Anglo parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W., and J.B. Pilet (eds.). 2015. The politics of party leadership: A cross-national perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Ancona, M. 2016a. Leadsom was right to withdraw—Her candidacy was nonsense on stilts. The Guardian, 11 July. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/11/andrea-leadsom-right-withdraw-candidacy-nonsense. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • d’Ancona, M. 2016b. Michael Gove delivered the biggest blow to Boris Johnson’s career yet. The Guardian, 30 June. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/30/michael-gove-boris-johnson-tory-leadership-downing-street. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • Denham, A. 2016. Choosing party leaders: Anglophone democracies, British parties and the limits of comparative politics. British Politics, advance online publication 12 August. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0022-8.

  • Denham, A., and K. O’Hara. 2008. Democratising Conservative leadership selection: From grey suits to grass roots. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommett, K. The theory and practice of party modernisation: The Conservative Party under David Cameron, 2005–2015. British Politics 10(2): 249–266.

  • Dorey, P., and A. Denham. 2016. ‘The longest suicide vote in history’: The Labour Party leadership election of 2015. British Politics 11 (3): 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, P., M. Garnett, and A. Denham. 2011. From crisis to coalition: The Conservative Party, 1997–2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, A. 2002. Euroscepticism in contemporary British politics: Opposition to Europe in the British Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, R., and K. Janda. 1994. An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (3): 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, T. 2008. Choosing the Tory leader: Conservative Party leadership elections from Heath to Cameron. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, T. 2013. Cameron and liberal conservatism: Attitudes within the parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative ministers. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (3): 340–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heppell, T., A. Crines, and D. Jeffery. 2017. The United Kingdom referendum on European Union membership: The voting of Conservative parliamentarians. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 762–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, D., Heppell, T., Hayton, R., and A. Crines. 2017. The Conservative Party leadership election of 2016: An analysis of the voting motivations of Conservative parliamentarians. Parliamentary Affairs, advance access, 8 August. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx027.

  • Jobson, R., and M. Wickham-Jones. 2011. Reinventing the block vote? Trade unions and the 2010 Labour Party leadership election. British Politics 6 (3): 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. 2016. I cannot stress too much that Britain is part of Europe—And always will be. Daily Telegraph, 26 June.

  • Kerr, P., and R. Hayton. 2015. Whatever happened to Conservative Party modernisation? British Politics 10 (2): 114–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, L. 2001. Democratizing party leadership selection. Party Politics 7 (3): 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P. 2015. Conservative modernisation and European integration: From silence to salience and schism. British Politics 10 (2): 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P., and P. Whitaker. 2013. Where there is discord, can they bring harmony? Managing intra-party dissent on European integration in the Conservative Party. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (3): 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, J.D. 1973. Opinion structure in political parties: The special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies 21 (2): 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. 2017. Policy, office and votes: Conservative MPs and the Brexit referendum. Parliamentary Affairs, advance access, 11 April. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx010.

  • Murray, R. 2010. Cracking the highest glass ceiling: A global comparison of women’s campaigns for executive office. Santa Barbara: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D.Z. 2015. Rising to the top: Gender, political performance, and party leadership in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1022–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B., and D. Stewart. 2009. Gender and political party leadership in Canada. Party Politics 15 (6): 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilet, J.B., and W. Cross (eds.). 2014. The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punnett, R. 1992. Selecting the party leader: Britain in comparative perspective. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. 2005. Leasehold or freehold? Leader-eviction rules in the British Conservative and Labour parties. Political Studies 53 (4): 793–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. 2012. Electing and ejecting party leaders in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. 2016. The British Labour Party’s leadership election of 2015. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (4): 759–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. forthcoming. Revolt on the left: Labour in opposition. In None past the post: Britain at the polls 2017, ed. N. Allen and J. Bartle. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Ramsden, J. 1998. An appetite for power: A history of the Conservative Party since 1830. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldon, A. 2008. Blair unbound. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, L. 1996. Choosing a leader: Party leadership contests in Britain from Macmillan to Blair. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • YouGov. 2016a. YouGov—Conservative Party members. YouGov, 2 March. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/681loa3q0n/InternalResults_ToryPoll1_W.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • YouGov. 2016b. YouGov—Conservative Party members recontact. YouGov, 2 March. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/lgyac6br0r/InternalResults_160302_ConservativePartyMemberPolls_W.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • YouGov. 2016c. YouGov/Times results—Conservative members. YouGov, 29 June. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/sp4prmurxb/TimesResults_160629_ConMembers.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2017.

  • YouGov. 2016d. YouGov/Times results—Conservative members. YouGov, 5 July. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/dgak27s1eh/TimesResults_160704_ConservativeMembers.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Government, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

    Thomas Quinn

Authors
  1. Thomas Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Quinn.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 40 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinn, T. The Conservative Party’s leadership election of 2016: choosing a leader in government. Br Polit 14, 63–85 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0071-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0071-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation