Skip to main content

Towards a participatory representative democracy? UK Parish councils and community engagement

A Correction to this article was published on 13 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper considers local democracy in the UK regarding citizen participation and engagement with Town and Parish councils. As the first tier of government and primary access point of democracy in England, Parish councils have the opportunity to be deeply connected and responsive to their communities. However conversely, they are the least democratic of all tiers of government, primarily due to low election turnouts and regular co-option. The paper contributes to a broader literature around improving citizen participation, considering specifically the question of how to encourage stronger engagement in local formal democracy in order to initiate vibrant participatory democracy within local representative structures. We use an innovative qualitative research methodology and a case study of the UK to find that many of the popular perceptions around Town and Parish councils can be traced to issues of communication. Consequently, we argue that engaging a more broader demographic, particularly through the use of new technologies such as social media or mobile phone Applications, may present a way forward to develop a vibrant local democratic sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

  • 13 July 2018

    In the original article version unfortunately the second author Joe Cruxon was missing. The original article has been corrected.

References

  • Atterton, J. 2007. The ‘Strength of Weak Ties’: Social Networking By Business Owners in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Sociologia Ruralis 47 (3): 228–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., and R. Chapman. 2008. Democracy Through Multi-level Governance: The Implementation of the Structural Funds in South Yorkshire. Governance 21 (3): 397–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. 1992. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S., and M. Brailey. 2014. Attachment to Community and Civic and Political Engagement: A Case Study of Students. Canadian Review of Sociology 51 (4): 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. 2009. Reflections on the Revolution in France (Oxford World’s Classics). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buser, M. 2013. Tracing the Democratic Narrative: Big Society, Localism, and Civic Engagement. Local Government Studies. 39 (1): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, T., and K. Christ. 2005. Social Capital and Economic Performance in the American States. Social Science Quaterly 86 (4): 827–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W.Y., S. Ou, and A. Reynolds. 2014. Adolescent Civic Engagement and Adult Outcomes: An Examination Among Urban Racial Minorities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 43: 1829–1843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., J. Neal, and Z. Neal. 2014. Transforming Individual Civic Engagement into Community Collective Efficacy: The Role of Bonding Social Capital. American Journal of Community Psychology 54: 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W.E. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed (Theory Out of Bounds). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. 2002. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in an Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined Up Services. Governance 15 (1): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall Council. 2016. Cornwall Council and Parish and Town Council Elections May 2013 https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/elections/election-results-and-information/cornwall-council-and-parish-and-town-council-elections-may-2013/.

  • De Graaf, L., M. Van Hulst, and A. Michels. 2015. Enhancing Participation in Disadvantaged Urban Neighbourhoods. Local Government Studies 41 (1): 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • East Goscote Parish Council. 2016. East Goscote’s Mobile App: Is this a Parish Council First? http://theappoffice.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Clerk-Jan16-p21.pdf.

  • Ellison, N., and M. Hardey. 2014. Social Media and Local Government: Citizenship, Consumption and Democracy. Local Government Studies 40 (1): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, S., and G. Pearce. 2002. Modernising Local Government: A Role for Parish and Town Councils. Local Government Studies 28 (2): 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, S., M. Tricker, and P. Waterston. 2000. Power to the Parishes—A (Missed) Opportunity. Local Government Studies 26 (2): 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., and S. Synett. 2007. Generating Social Capital? The Social Economy and Local Economic Development. European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (1): 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel, C., and S. Titcombe. 2016. Gender and the Experiences of Local Elected Members—A Focus on Wales. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1207629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. 2004. A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurtz, C., and T. Van de Wijdeven. 2010. Making Citizen Participation Work: The Challenging Search for New Forms of Local Democracy in The Netherlands. Local Government Studies 36 (4): 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heras, M., and D. Tabara. 2014. Lets Play Transformations! Performative Methods for Sustainability. Sustainability Science 9: 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 2014. Local Civic Participation and Democratic Legitimacy: Evidence from England and Wales. Political Studies 60 (4): 765–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambites, C. 2010. Sustainability and Attitudes to Locality: The Discourse of Town and Parish Councillors. Local Environment 15 (9–10): 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.531253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. 2013. Community Attachment, Religious Participation, and Quality of Life Satisfaction Among Adults Involved in Civic Participation. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment. 23: 561–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. 2004. Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., A. Arnason, A. Nightingale, and M. Shucksmith. 2005. Networking Social Capital and Identities in European Rural Development. Sociologia Ruralis 45 (4): 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Localism Act. 2011. HMSO. London.

  • Mead, G. 1934. Mind, Self, & Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, T., and J. Halsall. 2011. Community Governance and Local Decision Making: Paper Presented to the “Diversity and Convergence: Planning in a World of Change Conference”. Local Economy 26 (4): 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, A., and L. De Graaf. 2010. Examining Citizen Participation: Local Participatory Policy Making and Democracy. Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir, E., and M. Leyshon. 2013. The Design of Decision-Making: Participatory Budgeting and the Production of Localism. Local Environment 18 (9): 1002–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • NALC (National Association of Local Councils). 2015. The 2015 Parish and Town Council Elections: Feedback and Recommendations. London: NALC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office, Cabinet. 1999. Modernising Government. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlu-Gul, M., B. Raimi-Abraham, E. Jamieson, L. Wei, M. Murray, K. Stawarz, S. Stegemann, C. Tuleu, and F. Smith. 2014. Public Engagement Workshop: How to Improve Medicines for Older People? International Journal of Pharmaceutics 459: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone; The Collapse and Revival of American Community. London: Simon Schuster Paper Backs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortall, S. 2004. Social or Economic Goals, Civic Inclusion or Exclusion? An Analysis of Rural Development Theory and Practice. Sociologia Ruralis 44 (1): 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. 1998. Governance As Theory: Five Propositions. Oxford: UNESCO & Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., J. Corbin, and J. Corin. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, A., A. Macintosh, A. McKay-Hubbard, and D. Shell. 2006. An E-Democracy Model for Communities: Final Report of the E-Community Council Project. Edinburgh: International Teledemocracy Centre, Napier University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, J. 2016. Cornwall’s Devolution Deal: Towards a More Sustainable Governance? The Political Quarterly 87 (4): 582–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanie Willett.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: In the original article version unfortunately the second author Joe Cruxon was missing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willett, J., Cruxon, J. Towards a participatory representative democracy? UK Parish councils and community engagement. Br Polit 14, 311–327 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-00090-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-00090-4

Keywords

  • Parish council
  • Participatory democracy
  • Representative democracy