Psychological trauma has become the main framework for understanding the impact of rape on individual victims. Trauma has traditionally been understood as a mental illness conceptualized in opposition to normality. This dichotomous model of trauma is now in competition with a scale model in which trauma is conceptualized on a scale of normality. In this article, I study these two models of trauma by analyzing victims’ narratives of rape. I investigate how trauma emerges in victims’ narratives of rape to consider the ways in which the trauma discourse contributes to shaping how victims make sense of, and respond to, experiences of rape. The analysis is based on qualitative interviews with rape victims. I argue that the interviewees primarily talk about trauma on a scale of normality in which they portray trauma as something they can develop if they do not take responsibility for their health. In this way, they can escape trauma and, accordingly, the potential stigmatizing effects of psychiatric labels. At the same time, however, escaping trauma in this manner makes trauma inescapable, as it entails their continued commitment to take responsibility for their health.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bacchi, C., and J. Bonham. 2016. Appendix: Poststructural Interview Analysis: Politicizing ‘Personhood’. In Poststructural Policy Analysis. A Guide to Practice, ed. C. Bacchi and S. Goodwin. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
Breslau, J. 2004. Introduction: Cultures of Trauma: Anthropological Views of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in International Health. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 28: 113–126.
Bumiller, K. 2008. In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement Against Sexual Violence. Durham: Duke University Press.
Burgess, A.W., and L.L. Holmstrom. 1974. Rape Trauma Syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry 131: 981–986.
Canguilhem, G. 2012. On the Normal and the Pathological. Berlin: Springer.
Clarke, A.E., and J. Shim. 2011. Medicalization and Biomedicalization Revisited: Technoscience and Transformations of Health, Illness and American Medicine. In Handbook of the Sociology of Health, Illness, and Healing: A Blueprint for the 21st Century, ed. B.A. Pescosolido, J.K. Martin, J.D. Mcleod, and A. Rogers. New York: Springer.
Conrad, P. 2005. The Shifting Engines of Medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46: 3–14.
Dahl, S. 1993. Rape: A Hazard to Health. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Egan, S. 2016. Sexual Assault as Trauma: A Foucauldian Examination of Knowledge Practices in the Field of Sexual Assault Service Provision. Feminist Review 112: 95–112.
Fassin, D., and R. Rechtman. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fladby, B. 2004. Et sinnssykt stort kjempeskille i livet. Oslo: Oslo kommune, Legevakten, Sosial Vakttjeneste.
Garland, D. 1996. The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society. The British Journal of Criminology 36: 445–471.
Gavey, N. 1999. ‘I Wasn’t Raped, but…’: Revisiting Definitional Problems in Sexual Victimization. In New Versions of Victims Feminists Struggle with the Concept, ed. S. Lamb. New York: New York University Press.
Gavey, N., and J. Schmidt. 2011. “Trauma of Rape” Discourse: A Double-Edged Template for Everyday Understandings of the Impact of Rape? Violence Against Women 17: 433–456.
Guilfoyle, M. 2013. Client Subversions of DSM knowledge. Feminism & Psychology 23: 86–92.
Hacking, I. 1991. The Making and Molding of Child Abuse. Critical Inquiry 17: 253–288.
Hacking, I. 1994. Memoro-politics, Trauma and the Soul. History of the Human Sciences 7: 29–52.
Hacking, I. 1995. The Looping Effects of Human Kinds. In Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ed. D. Sperber, D. Premack, and A.J. Premack, 351–383. New York: Oxford University Press.
Herman, J.L. 1997. Trauma and Recovery. New York: BasicBooks.
Kleinman, A., and R. Desjarlais. 1997. Violence, Culture, and the Politics of Trauma. In Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine, ed. A. Kleinman. California: University of California Press.
Kugelmann, R. 1992. Stress: The Nature and History of Engineered Grief. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamb, S. 1999. Constructing the Victim: Popular Images and Lasting Labels. In New Versions of Victims Feminist. Struggle with the Concept, ed. S. Lamb. New York: New York University Press.
Marecek, J. 1999. Trauma Talk in Feminist Clinical Pratice. In New Versions of Victims. Feminists Struggle with the Concept, ed. S. Lamb. New York: New York University Press.
Marriner, S. (2012). Questioning “Expert” Knowledges. In Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism, 409–450.
Mcgarry, R., and S. Walklate. 2015. Victims: Trauma, Testimony and Justice. New York: Routledge.
Mulla, S. 2014. The Violence of Care: Rape Victims, Forensic Nurses, and Sexual Assault Intervention. New York: New York University Press.
Munro, V.E. 2017. Shifting Sands? Consent, Context and Vulnerability in Contemporary Sexual Offences Policy in England and Wales. Social & Legal Studies 26: 417–440.
Nou 2008:4 Fra ord til handling. Bekjempelse av voldtekt krever handling [From Words to Action—Fighting Rape Requires Action]. In: Justis- Og Politidepartementet [Ministry of Justice and Public Security] (ed.). Oslo: Departementenes Servicesenter, informasjonsforvaltning.
Quinlan, A. 2017. The Technoscientific Witness of Rape: Contentious Histories of Law, Feminism, and Forensic Science. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Romelli, K., A. Frigerio, and M. Colombo. 2016. DSM over Time: From Legitimisation of Authority to Hegemony. BioSocieties 11: 1–21.
Rose, N. 1996. Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. 2001a. Normality and Pathology in a Biological Age. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 3: 19–33.
Rose, N. 2001b. The Politics of Life Itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18: 1–30.
Rose, N. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sweet, P.L. 2018. The Paradox of Legibility: Domestic Violence and Institutional Survivorhood. Social Problems 66 (3): 411–427.
Sweet, P.L., and C.L. Decoteau. 2018. Contesting Normal: The DSM-5 and Psychiatric Subjectivation. BioSocieties 13: 103–122.
Valverde, M., and K. White-Mair. 1999. ‘One Day at a Time’ and Other Slogans for Everyday Life: The Ethical Practices of Alcoholics Anonymous. Sociology 33: 393–410.
Young, A. 1997. The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
I declare no competing interests (intellectual or financial) in the research detailed.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Laugerud, S. Narrating the harm of rape: how rape victims invoke different models of psychological trauma. BioSocieties 16, 22–40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00178-0
- Psychological trauma