Adrian, S. 2006. Nye skabelsesberetninger om æg, sæd og embryoner: Et etnografisk studie af skabelser på sædbanker og fertilitetsklinikker. Linköping: Linköping Arts and Science. No. 370. LiU-Tryck.
Adrian, S.W. 2010. Sperm stories: Politics and practices of sperm donation in Denmark and Sweden. The European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 393–411.
Adrian, S.W. 2016. Subversive practices of sperm donation: Globalising Danish sperm. In Critical kinship studies, ed. C. Kroløkke, L. Myong, S.W. Adrian, and T. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, 185–202. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Adrian, S.W. 2017. Etik på Grænsen—At vælge donor. In Kritiske perspektiver i helsefagene: Utdanning, yrkespraksis og forskning, ed. M. Feiring, I. Knutsen, T. Juritzen, and K. Larsen, 233–254. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Adrian, S.W., and C. Kroløkke. 2018. Passport to parenthood reproductive pathways in and out of Denmark. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (2): 112–126.
Almeling, R. 2011. Sex cells—The medical market for eggs and sperm. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Barad, K. 1998. Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10 (2): 87–128.
Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Benjamin, R. 2018. Black afterlives matter: Cultivating kinfulness as reproductive justice. In Making kin not population, ed. A. Clarke and D. Haraways, 4–66. Chicago: Prickly Press.
Bergmann, S. 2012. Resemblance that matters: On transnational anonymized egg donation in two European IVF clinics. In Reproductive technologies as global form. Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and transnational encounters, ed. M. Knecht, M. Klotz, and S. Beck, 331–356. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birkler, J. 2012. Helt Uden Grænser. København: Munksgaard.
Bleakley, L. 2011. Redheaded donors are being turned away at sperm bank, BBC. 21 September. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Clarke, A. 2005. Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Colen, S. 1995. ‘Like a mother to them’: Stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York. In Conceiving the new world order. The global politics of reproduction, ed. F. Ginsburg and R. Rapp, 78–102. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
Cooper, M., and C. Waldby. 2014. Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Copenhagen Fertility Center. Pricelist. http://www.copenhagenfertilitycenter.com/priser.htm. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
Cryos International. https://www.cryosinternational.com. Accessed 17 Dec 2016.
Daniels, C. 2006. Exposing men. The science and politics of male reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Sperm Bank. https://www.europeanspermbank.com/en/. Accessed 17 Dec 2016.
European Union Cell and Tissue Directive. 2004. http://eur-ex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:102:0048:0058:EN:PDF. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.
Franklin, S., and C. Roberts. 2006. Born and made. An ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Funes, S.L. 2017. Egg donation in the making: Gender, selection and (in)visibilities in the Spanish bioeconomy of reproduction. In Bioeconomies. Life. Technology and Capital in the 21st Century, ed. V. Pavone and J. Gove, 253–278. Palgrave: Switzerland.
Gammeltoft, T. 2014. Haunting images. A cultural account of selective reproduction in vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gammeltoft, T., and A. Wahlberg. 2014. Selective reproductive technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 201–216.
Gerrits, T. 2016. It’s not my eggs, it is not my husband’s sperm, it is not my child. In Critical kinship studies, ed. C. Kroløkke, L. Myong, S.W. Adrian, and T. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, 65–80. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Ginsburg, F., and R. Rapp. 1995. Introduction. Conceiving the new world order. In Conceiving the new world order. The global politics of reproduction, ed. F. Ginsburg and R. Rapp, 1–18. Berkeley, CA: California University Press.
Graham, S. 2017. Being a ‘good’ parent: Single women reflecting upon ‘selfishness’ and ‘risk’ when pursuing motherhood through sperm donation. Anthropology & Medicine 25: 249–264.
Haraway, D. 1991. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature, ed. D. Haraway, 183–202. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Herbrand, C. 2016. Mitochondrial replacement techniques: Who are the potential users and will they benefit? Bioethics 31 (1): 46–54.
Hudson, N., and L. Culley. 2011. Assisted reproductive travel: UK patient trajectories. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22: 573–581.
Inhorn, M. 2010. ‘Assisted’ motherhood in global Dubai: Reproductive tourists and their helpers. In The globalization of motherhood: Deconstructions and reconstructions of biology and care, ed. J.M. Maher and W. Chavkin, 180–202. New York: Routledge.
Inhorn, M. 2015. Cosmopolitan conceptions: IVF Sojourns in global Dubai. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Inhorn, M.C., and Z.B. Gürtin. 2011. Cross-border reproductive care: A future research agenda. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23: 665–676.
Koch, L. 2006. On ethics, scientists and democracy. Writing the history of eugenic sterilization. In The history of contemporary science, technology and medicine, ed. R.E. Doel and T. Soederqvist, 97–112. London and New York: Routledge.
Knecht, M., M. Klotz, and S. Beck. 2012. Reproductive technologies as global form: Introduction. In Reproductive technologies as global form. Ethnographies of knowledge, practices, and transnational encounters, ed. M. Knecht, M. Klotz, and S. Beck, 11–26. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kroløkke, C. 2009. Click a donor: Viking masculinity on the line. Journal of Consumer Culture 9 (1): 7–30.
Kroløkke, C. 2014. West is best: Affective assemblages and Spanish oöcytes. European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (1): 57–71.
Layne, L. 2013a. Creepy’, ‘freaky’, and ‘strange’: How the ‘uncanny’ can illuminate the experience of single mothers by choice and lesbian couples who buy ‘dad. Journal of Consumer Culture 13 (2): 140–159.
Layne, L. 2013b. Intensive parenting alone. Negotiating the cultural contradictions of motherhood as a single mother by choice. In Parenting in global perspective. Negotiating ideologies of kinship, self and politics, ed. C. Faircloth, D.M. Hoffman, and L. Layne, 213–228. London: Routledge.
Legislation Number 460. 1997. Lov om kunstig befrugtning.
Legislation Number 535. 2006. Lov om ændring af lov om kunstig befrugtning I forbindelse med lægelig behandling, diagnostic, og forskning m.v.
Legislation Number 602. 2012. Lov om ændring af lov om kunstig befrugtning i forbindelse med lægelig behandling, Diagnostik og forskning m.v., børneloven og lov om adoption.
Luce, J. 2010. Beyond expectation: Lesbian⁄Bi⁄Queer women and assisted conception. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Luna, T.Z. 2010. Marching toward reproductive justice: Coalitional (re)framing of the march for women’s lives. Sociological Inquiry 80 (4): 554–578.
Mamo, L. 2007. Queering reproduction. Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Marcus, G. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Martin, L.J. 2015. Reproductive tourism in the United States: Creating family in the mother country. New York: Routledge.
Meelhus, M. 2012. Problems of conception. Issues of law, biotechnology, individuals and kinship. New York: Berghan Books.
Mohr, S. 2004. Semen—An ethnography of donating sperm in Denmark. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences.
Moore, L.J. 2008. Sperm counts. Overcome by man’s most precious fluid. New York: New York University Press.
Nordqvist, P. 2011a. ‘Dealing with sperm’: Comparing lesbians’ clinical and non-clinical donor conception processes. Sociology of Health & Illness 3 (1): 119–124.
Nordqvist, P. 2011b. Choreographies of sperm donation. Dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception. Social Science and Medicine 73: 1661–1668.
Pande, A. 2014. Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
Payne, J. 2013. Europeanizing reproduction: Reproductive technologies in Europe and Scandinavia. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (3): 236–242.
Pavone, V., and J. Gove. 2017. Introduction. In Bioeconomies. Life. Technology and capital in the 21st century, ed. V. Pavone and J. Gove, 1–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Petchesky, R.P. 1987. Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies 13 (2): 263–292.
Petersen, M.N. 2016. Becoming gay fathers through transnational commercial surrogacy. Journal of Family Issues 39 (3): 693–719.
Polkinghorne, D. 1995. Narrative configuration in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education 8 (1): 5–23.
Rapp, R. 1999. One new reproductive technology, multiple sites: How feminist methodology bleeds into everyday life. In Revisioning women, health, and healing: Feminist, cultural and technoscience perspectives, ed. A. Clarke and V. Olesen. New York: Routledge.
Rapp, R. 2000. Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
Ravn, T. 2017. Strategies for life: Lived realities of solo motherhood, kinship and medically assisted reproduction. PhD dissertation. Aarhus University, Politica.
Roberts, D. 1997. Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.
Róisín, R. 2009. Lesbian motherhood: Gender, families and sexual citizenship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmidt, M., and L.J. Moore. 1998. Constructing a ‘good catch’, picking a winner: The development of technosemen and the deconstruction of the monolithic male. In Cyborg babies: From techno-sex to techno-tots, ed. R. Davis-Floyd and J. Dumit, 21–39. New York: Routledge.
Statens Serum Institut. 2013. Assisteret Reproduktion.Tal og analyse. København: Author. https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/tal-og-analyser/analyser-og-rapporter/andre-analyser-og-rapporter/assisteret-reproduktion. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
Søndergaard, D., and L. Højgaard. 2010. Multimodale konstitueringsprocesser i empirisk forskning. In Kvalitative metoder. En grundbog, ed. S. Brinkmann and L. Tanggaard, 315–339. Hans Reitzels Forlag: København.
Sørensen, T.K. 2012. Skal sæddonoren være mægler eller violinist? Jyllandsposten sektion 1: 8–9.
Taylor, J.S. 2008. The public life of the fetal sonogram: Technology consumption, and the politics of reproduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Thompson, C. 2005. Making parents. The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Twine, F.W. 2015. Outsourcing the womb: Race, class and gestational surrogacy in a global market, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Wahlberg, A. 2018. Good quality. The routinization of sperm banking in China. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Wahlberg, A., and T. Gammeltoft (eds.). 2018. Selective reproduction in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wheatley, A. 2015. Good soldiers, good guys, and good parents: The meanings of donation and donated tissue in the context of the Danish donor sperm industry. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Wu, C. 2011. Managing multiple masculinities in donor insemination: Doctors configuring infertile men and sperm donors in Taiwan. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (1): 96–113.