Organized polemics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Balmer, Andrew S., Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Felicity Callard, and Des Fitzgerald. 2018. ‘Could We Meet?’: A Conversation on Collaboration. Feeling and Failure. BioSocieties 13 (3): 668–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beer, David. 2016. In Defence of Writing Book reviews. Times Higher Education (April 7, 2016).

  3. Bennett, Gaymon. 2016a. Technicians of Human Dignity. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, Gaymon. 2016b. Praemeditatio Malorum: The Disquieting Spiritual Politics of Pope Francis’ Encyclical on Climate Change—or—How (Not) to Read Laudato Si. BioSocieties 11(3): 406–414.

  5. Besnier, Niko, and Pablo Morales. 2018. Tell the Story: How to Write for American Ethnologist. American Ethnologist 45 (2): 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. How to Get an Article Accepted at American Anthropologist (or Anywhere). American Anthropologist 110 (3): 281–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Callard, Felicity, and Des Fitzgerald. 2015. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hacking, Ian. 2012. Two Histories of Autism, One by an Outsider. One by an Insider. BioSocieties 7 (3): 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagner, Michael. 2015. Zur Sache Des Buches. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2010a. Biosciences, Ethics and Collaborations. BioSocieties 5 (3): 391–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2010b. Cognitive Enhancement: Human Advancement, Degradation or Pseudo-Problem? BioSocieties 5 (4): 476–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Langlitz, Nicolas. 2014. Lessons and Conversions: Reading across Disciplinary Boundaries. BioSocieties 9 (2): 218–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcus, George E. 2003. On the Unbearable Slowness of Being an Anthropologist Now: Notes on a Contemporary Anxiety in the Making of Ethnography. Cross Cultural Poetics 12 (12): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Markus, Gyorgy. 1987. Why Is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Sciences? Some Preliminary Theses. Science in Context 1 (1): 5–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1989. On the Genealogy of Morals. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quednow, Boris. 2010. Ethics of Neuroenhancement. A Phantom Debate. BioSocieties 5 (1): 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabinow, Paul, and Gaymon Bennett. 2012. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheper-Hughes, N. 1992. Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schiavenato, Stephanie, and Rayna Rapp. 2018. Enduring Innovation in Reproduction. BioSocieties 13 (2): 536–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strathern, Marilyn. 2010. Ars Synthetica: A Rehearsal. BioSocieties 5 (3): 393–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Des Fitzgerald.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langlitz, N., Fitzgerald, D. Organized polemics. BioSocieties 14, 143–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00146-8

Download citation