Advertisement

BioSocieties

pp 1–25 | Cite as

Criminalizing the brain: Neurocriminology and the production of strategic ignorance

  • Mallory Fallin
  • Owen Whooley
  • Kristin Kay Barker
Original Article

Abstract

With the increasing use of imaging technologies like fMRI in prison sentencing and penal policy, sociologists must comprehend the consequences of these trends and the scientific assumptions upon which they stand. This article uses insights from the sociology of knowledge to interrogate the epistemological and ontological assumptions of neurocriminology, an interdisciplinary field that studies the neural basis of crime. Through a discourse analysis of research articles that embrace what we term the “neurocriminological vision,” we demonstrate how features of the research design eschew the consideration of social factors underlying crime and antisocial behavior. Focusing on the section of control variables, the ‘thinness’ of experimental tasks, and the management of inconvenient facts, we demonstrate how neurocriminological research transforms complex, socially situated behaviors into problems of neurocircuitry. We link these practices to the field-specific dynamics in which neurocriminology is situated, specifically as an interdisciplinary field which derives authority from neuroscience but is met with skepticism within criminology. In response to these dynamics, neurocriminologists produce not only knowledge, but also ignorance that is strategically useful given their professional goals. Beyond the particular case at hand, we emphasize the relationship between internal dynamics within scientific fields and their effects on the co-production of knowledge and ignorance.

Keywords

Neuroscience Criminology Ignorance Sociology of knowledge Discourse analysis 

References

  1. Abend, G. 2011. Thick concepts and the moral brain. European Journal of Sociology. 52 (1): 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abend, G. 2016. What are neural correlates neural correlates of? BioSocieties 12 (3): 1–24.Google Scholar
  3. Adolphs, R. 2003. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (3): 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aharoni, E., G.M. Vincent, C.L. Harenski, V.D. Calhoun, W. Sinnott-Armstrong, M.S. Gazzinga, and K.A. Kiehl. 2013. Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (15): 6223–6228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albein-Urios, N., J. Verdejo-Román, C. Soriano-Mas, S. Asensio, J.M. Martínez-González, and A. Verdejo-García. 2013. Cocaine users with comorbid Cluster B personality disorders show dysfunctional brain activation and connectivity in the emotional regulation networks during negative emotion maintenance and reappraisal. European Neuropsychopharmacology 23 (12): 1698–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albert, M., and D.L. Kleinman. 2011. Bringing Pierre Bourdieu to science and technology studies. Minerva 49 (3): 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alexander, M. 2010. The new Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barkataki, I.K., V. Kumari, M. Das, A. Sumich, P. Taylor, and T. Sharma. 2008. Neural correlates of deficient response inhibition in mentally disordered violent individuals. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 26: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beaver, K.M., J.L. Nedelec, C. da Silva Costa, and M.M. Vidal. 2015. The future of biosocial criminology. Criminal Justice Studies 28 (1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bediou, B., M. Eimer, T. d’Amato, T. d’Amato, O. Hauk, and A.J. Calder. 2009. In the eye of the beholder: Individual differences in reward-drive modulate early frontocentral ERPs to angry faces. Neuropsychologia 47 (3): 825–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14 (6): 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brekhus, W. 1998. A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory 16 (1): 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brosnan, C., and M. Michael. 2014. Enacting the ‘neuro’ in practice: Translational research, adhesion and the promise of porosity. Social Studies of Science 44 (5): 680–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burge, T. 1986. Individualism and psychology. Philosophical Review 45: 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burri, R.V. 2008. Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science 38 (1): 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burt, C.H., and R.L. Simons. 2014. Pulling back the curtain on heritability studies: Biosocial criminology in the postgenomic era. Criminology 52 (2): 223–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Button, K., J. Ioannidis, C. Mokrysz, B. Nosek, J. Flint, E. Robinson, and M. Munafò. 2013. Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14: 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Contreras-Rodríguez, O., J. Pujol, I. Batalla, B.J. Harrison, J. Bosque, I. Ibern-Regàs, R. Hernández-Ribas, C. Soriano-Mas, J. Deus, and M. López-Solà. 2014. Disrupted neural processing of emotional faces in psychopathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9 (4): 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook, G. 2013. Secrets of the criminal mind. Scientific American, 7 May, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/secrets-criminal-mind-adrian-raine/. Accessed 16 March 2018.
  20. Danziger, K. 1990. Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2010. Objectivity. Boston: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  22. Dumit, J. 2004. Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Easterbrook, P.J., R. Gopalan, J.A. Berlin, and D.R. Matthews. 1991. Publication bias in clinical research. The Lancet 337 (8746): 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fehr, T., A. Achtziger, G. Roth, and D. Strüber. 2014. Neural correlates of empathetic perceptual processing of realistic social interaction scenarios displayed from a first-order perspective. Brain Research 1583: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine, A., L. Steinberg, P.J. Frick, and E. Cauffman. 2016. Self-control assessments and implications for predicting adolescent offending. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 45: 701–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gilbert, G.N., and M. Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Glenn, A.L., and A. Raine. 2014. Neurocriminology: Implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behavior. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15: 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodwin, C. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hacking, I. 1992. The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In Science as practice and culture, ed. A. Pickering, 29–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hare, R.D. 2007. The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised: PLC-R. Toronto: MHS, Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  31. Harenski, C.L., and K.A. Kiehl. 2010. Neural processing of moral violations among incarcerated adolescents with psychopathic traits. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartung, C.M., and T.A. Widiger. 1998. Gender differences in the diagnosis of mental disorders: Conclusions and controversies of the DSMIV. Psychological Bulletin 123 (3): 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hedgecoe, A. 2001. Schizophrenia and the narrative of enlightened geneticization. Social Studies of Science 31 (6): 875–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Heekeren, H.R., I. Wartenburger, H. Schmidt, H. Schwintowski, and A. Villringer. 2003. An fMRI study of simple ethical decision-making. NeuroReport 14 (9): 1215–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heimer, C.A. 2012. Inert facts and the illusion of knowledge: Strategic uses of ignorance in HIV clinics. Economy and Society 41 (1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herpetz, S.C., and H. Sass. 2000. Emotional deficiency and psychopathy. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 18: 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heylen, B., L. Pauwels, K.M. Beaver, and M. Ruffinengo. 2015. Defending biosocial criminology: On the discursive style of our critics, the separation of ideology and science, and a biologically informed defense of fundamental values. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology 7 (1): 83–96.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes, V. 2010. Science in court: Head case. Nature News 464 (7287): 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jones, O.D., R. Marois, M.J. Farah, and H.T. Greely. 2013. Law and neuroscience. Journal of Neuroscience 33 (45): 17624–17630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Joyce, K.A. 2008. Magnetic appeal: MRI and the myth of transparency. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kiehl, K.A. 2014. The psychopath whisperer: The science of those without conscience. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  42. Kiehl, K.A., and M.B. Hoffman. 2011. The criminal psychopath: History, neuroscience, treatment, and economics. Jurimetrics 51: 355–397.Google Scholar
  43. Kiehl, K.A., A.M. Smith, A. Mendrek, B.B. Forster, R.D. Hare, and P.F. Liddle. 2004. Temporal lobe abnormalities in semantic processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 130 (1): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Latour, B. 1988. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Levitt, S.D., and J.A. List. 2007. What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, B.T., and B.J. Ham. 2008. Monoamine oxidase A-uVNTR genotype affects limbic brain activity in response to affective facial stimuli. Behavioral, Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience 19 (5): 515–519.Google Scholar
  47. Lieberman, M.D. 2013. Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Littlefield, M.M., and J. Johnson. 2012. The neuroscientific turn: Transdisciplinarity in the age of the brain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Macaskill, G. 2015. Brain scan can identify serial killers-in-waiting: Experts reveal everyday triggers that turn people to crime. Mirror, 20 October, https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/brain-scan-can-identify-serial-6641868. Accessed 16 March 2018.
  50. Marris, C., C. Jefferson, and F. Lentzos. 2014. Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge: The case of dual use and synthetic biology. BioSocieties 9 (4): 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McGoey, L. 2012. Strategic unknowns: Towards a sociology of ignorance. Economy and Society 41 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, G. 2016. Brain scans are prone to false positives, study says. Science 353 (6296): 208–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moskowitz, C. 2011. Criminal minds are different from yours, brain scans reveal. LiveScience, 4 March, https://www.livescience.com/13083-criminals-brain-neuroscience-ethics.html. Accessed 16 March 2018.
  54. Mullaney, J.L. 1999. Making it “count”: Mental weighing and identity attribution. Symbolic Interaction 22 (3): 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nock, M.K., A.E. Kazdin, E. Hiripi, and R.C. Kessler. 2006. Prevalence, subtypes, and correlates of DSM-IV conduct disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological Medicine 36 (5): 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nordstrom, B., Y. Gao, A. Glenn, M. Peskin, A. Rudo-Hutt, R. Schug, Y. Yang, and A. Raine. 2011. Neurocriminology. Advances in Genetics 75: 255–283.Google Scholar
  57. Norgaard, K.M. 2006. ‘People want to protect themselves a little bit’: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry 76 (3): 372–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Connor, C., G. Rees, and H. Joffe. 2012. Neuroscience in the public sphere. Neuron 74 (2): 220–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ortega, F., and F. Vidal. 2011. Neurocultures: Glimpses into an expanding universe. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  60. Osumi, T., T. Nakao, Y. Kasuya, J. Shinoda, J. Yamada, and H. Ohira. 2012. Amygdala dysfunction attenuates frustration-induced aggression in psychopathic individuals in a non-criminal population. Journal of Affective Disorders 142 (1): 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Panofsky, A. 2011. Field analysis and interdisciplinary science: Scientific capital exchange in behavior genetics. Minerva 49 (3): 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pascual-Leone, A., A. Amedi, F. Fregni, and L.B. Merabet. 2005. The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience. 28: 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Payer, D.E., K. Baicy, M.D. Lieberman, and E.D. London. 2012. Overlapping neural substrates between intentional and incidental down-regulation of negative emotions. Emotion 12 (2): 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peterson, A. 2001. Biofantasies: Genetics and medicine in the print media. Social Science and Medicine 52 (8): 1255–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pickersgill, M. 2011a. ‘Promising’ therapies: Neuroscience, clinical practice, and the treatment of psychopathy. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (3): 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pickersgill, M. 2011b. Ordering disorder: Knowledge production and uncertainty in neuroscience research. Science as Culture 20 (1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pitts-Taylor, V. 2016. The brain’s body: Neuroscience and corporeal politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Plomin, R.D., J.C. DeFries, G.E. McClearn, and P. McGuffin (eds.). 2001. Behavioral genetics: A primer, 4th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Raine, A. 2013. The anatomy of violence: The biological roots of crime. NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  70. Racine, E., S. Waldman, J. Rosenberg, and J. Iles. 2010. Contemporary neuroscience in the media. Social Science and Medicine 71 (4): 725–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rafter, N. 2008. The criminal brain. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Reisig, M.D., W.D. Bales, C. Hay, and X. Wang. 2007. The effect of racial inequality on black male recidivism. Justice Quarterly 24 (3): 408–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rocque, M., and C. Posick. 2017. Paradigm shift or normal science? The future of (biosocial) criminology. Theoretical Criminology 21 (3): 288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose, N., and J.M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millennium. Neuron 35 (1): 21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rubia, K., R. Halari, A.B. Smith, F. Matsukura, M. Mohammad, E. Taylor, and M. Brammer. 2008. Dissociated functional brain abnormalities of inhibition in boys with pure conduct disorder and in boys with pure attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry 165 (7): 889–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Savelsberg, J.J., R.D. King, and L.L. Cleveland. 2002. Politicized scholarship? Science on crime and the state. Social Problems 49 (3): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sbordone, R.J. 1996. Ecological validity: Some critical issues for the neuropsychologist. In Ecological validity of neuropsychological testing, ed. R.J. Sborbone and C.J. Long, 15–41. Delray Beach: St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
  79. Scargle, J.D. 2000. Publication bias: The “file-drawer” problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration 14 (1): 91–106.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, S., J. Peters, U. Bromberg, S. Brassen, M.M. Menz, S.F. Miedl, E. Loth, T. Banaschewski, A. Barbot, G. Barker, P.J. Conrod, J.W. Dalley, H. Flor, J. Gallinat, H. Garavan, A. Heinz, B. Itterman, C. Mallik, K. Mann, E. Artiges, T. Paus, J.B. Poline, M. Rietschel, L. Reed, M.N. Smolka, R. Spanagel, C. Speiser, A. Ströhle, M. Struve, G. Schumann, C. Büchel, and the IMAGEN consortium. 2011. Boys do it the right way: Sex-dependent amygdala lateralization during face processing in adolescents. NeuroImage 56: 1847–1853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Seabrook, J. 2008. Suffering souls. The New Yorker, 10 November, http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/11/10/suffering-souls. accessed 25 August 2017.
  82. Sherman, L.W., D.A. Smith, J.D. Schmidt, and D.P. Rogan. 1992. Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review 57 (5): 680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smith, A.B., E. Taylor, M. Brammer, R. Halari, and K. Rubia. 2008. Reduced activation in right lateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus in medication-naïve adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during time discrimination. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49 (9): 977–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sommer, M., B. Sodian, K. Döhnel, J. Schwerdtner, J. Meinhardt, and G. Hajak. 2010. In psychopathic patients emotion attribution modulates activity in outcome-related brain areas. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 182 (2): 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thornton, D.J. 2011. Brain culture: Neuroscience and popular media. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Uttal, W. 2001. The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  87. Vidal, F. 2009. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences 22 (1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Völlm, B., P. Richardson, S. McKie, R. Elliott, M. Dolan, and B. Deakin. 2007. Neuronal correlates of reward and loss in cluster B personality disorders: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 156 (2): 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang, X., D. Mears, and W. Bales. 2010. Race-specific employment contexts and recidivism. Criminology 48 (4): 1171–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weber, M. 1958. Science as a vocation. Daedalus 87 (1): 111–134.Google Scholar
  91. Wiesberg, D.S., F. Keil, J. Goodstein, E. Rawson, and J.R. Gray. 2008. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (3): 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Woolgar, S., and D. Pawluch. 1985. Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems 32 (3): 214–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wright, J.P., and D. Boisvert. 2009. What biosocial criminology offers criminology. Criminal Justice and Behavior 36 (11): 1228–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wynn, R., M.H. Holseth, and G. Petterson. 2012. Psychopathy in women: Theoretical and clinical perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health 4: 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zerubavel, E. 2015. Hidden in plain sight: The social structure of irrelevance. NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mallory Fallin
    • 1
  • Owen Whooley
    • 2
  • Kristin Kay Barker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and CriminologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations