Diversity: How a late modern value transformed the biosciences

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Jane Calvert, “Synthetic Biology: Constructing Nature?,” The Sociological Review 58 (2010): 95–112; Jane Calvert, “Engineering Biology and Society: Reflections on Synthetic Biology,” Science Technology & Society 18, no. 3 (2013): 405–20; Susanna Claire Finlay, “Engineering Biology? Exploring Rhetoric, Practice, Constraints and Collaborations within a Synthetic Biology Research Centre,” Engineering Studies 5, no. 1 (2013): 26–41; Evelyn Fox Keller, “What Does Synthetic Biology Have to Do with Biology?,” BioSocieties 4, no. 2–3 (2009): 291–302; Evelyn Fox Keller, “Knowing As Making, Making As Knowing: The Many Lives of Synthetic Biology,” Biological Theory 4, no. 4 (2011): 333–39; Maureen A. O’Malley et al., “Knowledge-Making Distinctions in Synthetic Biology,” BioEssays 30, no. 1 (2008): 57–65.

  2. 2.

    Karen Barad, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3 (March 1, 2003): 802.

  3. 3.

    For example of how science studies’ scholars have approached scientific thinking as already analytical and theories as materialized in the world, variously described as “lateral thinking,” “athwart theory,” and “theory out of science,” see Birgitte Gorm Hansen et al., Adapting in the Knowledge Economy: Lateral Strategies for Scientists and Those Who Study Them (PhD School of Economics and Management, 2011); Stefan Helmreich, “Nature/Culture/Seawater,” American Anthropologist 113, no. 1 (2011): 132–144; Stefan Helmreich, Alien Ocean: An Anthropology of Marine Microbiology and the Limits of Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009); Carla Hustak and Natasha Myers, “Involutionary Momentum: Affective Ecologies and the Sciences of Plant/Insect Encounters,” Differences 23, no. 3 (2012): 74–118; Hannah Landecker, “Antibiotic Resistance and the Biology of History,” Body & Society 22, no. 4 (2016): 19–52; Bill Maurer, Mutual Life, Limited: Islamic Banking, Alternative Currencies, Lateral Reason (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005); Sophia Roosth and Astrid Schrader, “Feminist Theory Out of Science: Introduction,” Differences 23, no. 3 (2012): 1–8.

  4. 4.

    Svetlana Boym, Common Places: Mythologies of Everyday Life in Russia (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), 10.

  5. 5.

    Evelyn Fox Keller, Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002), 11–12.

  6. 6.

    Here Rabinow is referring to his (and Stavrianakis’s) expulsion in 2011 from SynBERC (the Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center), a consortium of multiple synthetic biology researchers and universities.

  7. 7.

    Marilyn Strathern, The Gender of the Gift (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 38.

  8. 8.

    Paul Rabinow and Anthony Stavrianakis, Demands of the Day: On the Logic of Anthropological Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013); Paul Rabinow and Anthony Stavrianakis, Designs on the Contemporary: Anthropological Tests (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014).

  9. 9.

    James D. Faubion et al., “On the Anthropology of the Contemporary: Addressing Concepts, Designs, and Practices,” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6, no. 1 (2016): 376.

  10. 10.

    James Clifford and George E Marcus, eds., Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).

  11. 11.

    Danilyn Rutherford, “Kinky Empiricism,” in Writing Culture and the Life of Anthropology, ed. Orin Starn (Durham: Duke University Press, 2015), 107.

  12. 12.

    Keller, Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines, 11–12.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diversity: How a late modern value transformed the biosciences. BioSocieties 13, 787–805 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0096-6

Download citation