, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 520–542 | Cite as

Mapping Global Health: A network analysis of a heterogeneous publication domain

  • George WeiszEmail author
  • Alberto Cambrosio
  • Jean-Philippe Cointet
Original Article


This paper examines one of the most visible but oddly neglected aspects of the rapidly expanding Global Health (GH) enterprise: its vast literature. Basing our data on the PubMed MeSH term “World Health” (changed to “Global Health” in 2015) and utilizing the citation and funding metadata provided by Web of Science, we analyze nearly 20,000 articles using the software platform CorTexT for the automatic processing of large text corpora. We perform several types of scientometric network analyses, and provide maps displaying inter-citations among journals publishing GH articles, co-authorship among the 292 authors who published 12 or more papers, co-citation analysis of works (articles, books, and reports) cited at least 30 times by the papers in our database, and funding sources since 2008. The maps display the social, cognitive, and funding substructure of the GH publication field. We suggest that this somewhat fragmented and fuzzy domain is held together by (1) a core group of authors who have for some time been co-authoring numerous papers and reports with one another; (2) several central journals, most notably the Lancet, addressing wider audiences and transcending the narrow specialization characteristic of scientific and biomedical fields; and (3) a growing body of large-data metrics, most prominently the Global Burden of Disease, which has become a rhetorical resource for numerous groups with different agendas.


Global Health literature network analysis co-authorship co-citation funding metrics 



Research for this paper was made possible by grants from the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC SE-164195) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #430-2015-00988). This manuscript comprises original material that is not under review elsewhere. The data on which the research is based are in the public domain and are thus not subject to ethical review. The authors declare that they have no competing interests – intellectual or financial – in the research detailed in the manuscript.


  1. Adams, V. (2016) Metrics: What Counts in Global Health. Durham NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachrach, C.A. and Charen, T. (1978) Selection of MEDLINE contents, the development of its thesaurus, and the indexing process. Medical Informatics 3(3): 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biehl, J. and Petryna, A. (eds.) (2013) When People Come First: Critical Studies in Global Health. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Binka, F. et al (2002) An open letter to the Executive Board of WHO. The Lancet 360(9348): 1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchet, N. et al (2013) Global Collective Action in Health: The WDR + 20 Landscape of Core and Supportive Functions. Working paper for The Lancet Commission on Investing in Health, July 5.Google Scholar
  6. Brandt, A.M. (2013) How AIDS invented global health. New England Journal of Medicine 368(23): 2149–2152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T.M., Cueto, M. and Fee, E. (2006) The World Health Organization and the transition from “international” to ‘global’ public health. American Journal of Public Health 96(1): 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cointet, J.P. et al (2012) Les réseaux de l’expression génique: émergence et développement d’un domaine clé de la génomique. Médecine/Sciences (Paris) 28(Spec No. 1): 7–13.Google Scholar
  9. Commission on Health Research for Development (1990) Health Research: Essential Link to Equity in Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doll, R. and Peto, R. (1981) The causes of cancer: Quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 66(6): 1192–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elias, N. (1978) What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fan, E.L. and Uretsky, E. (2016) In search of results: Anthropological interrogations of evidence-based global health. Critical Public Health, advance online publication, December 07, 2016. doi. 10.1080/09581596.2016.1264573.
  13. Farmer, P. et al (2013) Reimagining Global Health. An Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fassin, D. (2012) That obscure object of global health. In: M.C. Inhorn and E.A. Wentzel (eds.) Medical Anthropology at the Intersections. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
  15. Fenner, F. et al (1988) Smallpox and its Eradication Continued. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Frenk, J. et al (2010) Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet 376(9756): 1923–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaudillière, J.-P. (2014) De la santé publique internationale à la santé globale. L’OMS, la Banque mondiale et le gouvernement des thérapies chimiques. In: D. Pestre (ed.) Le gouvernement des technosciences: Gouverner le progrès et ses dégâts depuis 1945, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 65–96.Google Scholar
  18. Godlee, F. (1994) WHO in crisis. BMJ: British Medical Journal 309(6966): 1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grassano, N. et al (2016) Funding data from publication acknowledgements: Coverage, uses and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, advance online publication, November 22, 2016; doi: 10.1002/asi.23737.
  20. Hoffman, S.J., Cole, C.B. and Pearcey, M. (2015) Mapping Global Health Architecture to Inform the Future. London: Centre on Global Health Security, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. Jamison, D.T. (2006) Priorities in Health. Washington, DC: World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, D., Cambrosio, A. and Mogoutov, A. (2011) Detection and characterization of translational research in cancer and cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Translational Medicine 9: 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koplan, J.P. et al (2009) Towards a common definition of global health. The Lancet 373(9679): 1993–1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakoff, A. (2010) Two regimes of global health. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1(1): 59–79.Google Scholar
  25. Lewington, S. et al (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: A meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. The Lancet 360(9349): 1903–1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewison, G. and Sullivan R. (2015) Conflicts of interest statements on biomedical papers. Scientometrics 102(3): 2151–2159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCoy, D., Kembhavi, G., Patel, J. and Luintel, A. (2009) The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s grant-making programme for global health. The Lancet 373(9675): 1645–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGoey, L. (2014) The philanthropic state: market–state hybrids in the philanthrocapitalist turn. Third World Quarterly 35(1): 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGoey, L. (2015) No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  30. Murray, C.J.L. and Lopez, A.D. (1996) The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, C.J. and Frenk, J. (2000) A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78(6): 717–731.Google Scholar
  32. Nelson, S.J., Johnston, W.D. and Humphreys, B. L. (2001) Relationships in medical subject headings (MeSH). In: C.A. Bean and R. Green (eds.) Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Omran, A.R. (1971) The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 49(4): 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Packard, R.M. (2016) A History of Global Health: Interventions into the Lives of Other Peoples. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Parkin, D.M. et al (eds.) (1997) Cancer incidence in five continents, Vol. VII. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications No. 143.Google Scholar
  36. Peto, R. et al (1992) Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: indirect estimation from national vital statistics. The Lancet 339(8804): 1268–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reubi, D. (2016) Of neoliberalism and global health: Human capital, market failure and sin/social taxes. Critical Public Health 26(5): 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reubi, D., Herrick, C. and Brown, T. (2015) The politics of non-communicable diseases in the global South. Health and Place 26(3): 532–554.Google Scholar
  39. Rosch, E.H. (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rule, A., Cointet, J.-P. and Bearman, P.S. (2015) Lexical shifts, substantive changes, and continuity in State of the Union discourse, 1790–2014. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(35): 10837–10844.Google Scholar
  41. Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  42. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stover, J. et al (2002) Can we reverse the HIV/AIDS pandemic with an expanded response? The Lancet 360(9326): 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szlezák, N. A. et al (2010) The Global Health system: Actors, norms, and expectations in transition. PLoS Medicine 7(1): e1000183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh, J.A. and Warren, K.S. (1979) Selective primary health care. New England Journal of Medicine 301(18): 967–974.Google Scholar
  46. Wahlberg, A. and Rose, N. (2015) The governmentalization of living: Calculating global health. Economy and Society 44(1): 60–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weisz, G. and Olszynko-Gryn J. (2010) The theory of epidemiologic transition: the origins of a citation classic. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 65(3): 287–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weisz, G. and Vignola Gagné, E. (2015) The World Health Organization and the globalization of chronic noncommunicable disease. Population and Development Review 41(3): 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilkinson, R.G. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Bank (1993) World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. WHO-World Health Organization (1978) Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12 September.Google Scholar
  52. WHO-World Health Organization (2001) Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  53. WHO-World Health Organization (2008) Closing the Gap in a Generation Health: Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Commission on Social Determinants of Health Final Report. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Studies of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Université Paris Est, LISIS, UMR 1326 INRAMarne-la-ValléeFrance

Personalised recommendations