, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 568–587 | Cite as

“I don’t have to know why it snows, I just have to shovel it!”: Addiction recovery, genetic frameworks, and biological citizenship

  • Molly J. DingelEmail author
  • Jenny Ostergren
  • Kathleen Heaney
  • Barbara A. Koenig
  • Jennifer McCormick
Original Article


The gene has infiltrated the way citizens perceive themselves and their health. However, there is scant research that explores the ways genetic conceptions infiltrate individuals’ understanding of their own health as it relates to a behavioral trait such as addiction. Do people seeking treatment for addiction ground their self-perception in biology in a way that shapes their experiences? We interviewed 63 participants in addiction treatment programs, asking how they make meaning of a genetic understanding of addiction in the context of their recovery, and in dealing with the stigma of addiction. About two-thirds of people in our sample did not find a genetic conception of addiction personally useful to them in treatment, instead believing that the cause was irrelevant to their daily struggle to remain abstinent. One-third of respondents believed that an individualized confirmation of a genetic predisposition to addiction would facilitate their dealing with feelings of shame and accept treatment. The vast majority of our sample believed that a genetic understanding of addiction would reduce the stigma associated with addiction, which demonstrates the perceived power of genetic explanations in U.S. society. Our results indicate that respondents (unevenly) ground their self-perception of themselves as an addicted individual in biology.


addiction substance use alcohol/alcoholism behavioral genetics 



The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research: The project described was supported by Grant Number R01 DA014577 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Mayo Clinic S.C. Johnson Genomics of Addiction Program, and Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.


  1. 23andMe. (2016) “Know More About You.”
  2. Acker, C.J. (2010) How crack found a Niche in the American Ghetto: The historical epidemiology of drug-related harm. BioSocieties 5(1):70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcoholics Anonymous. (1984) This is A.A.: An introduction to the A.A. recovery program. Alcoholics Anonymous.
  4. Altshuler, D., Brooks, L.D., Chakravarti, A., Collins, F.S., Daly, M.J., Donnelly, P. and Gibbs, R.A., et al. (2005) A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437(7063):1299–1320. doi: 10.1038/nature04226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American Society of Addiction Medicine. (2015) Definition of addiction.
  6. AncestryDNA. (2016) Discover the family story your DNA can tell.
  7. Bandura, A. (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education and Behavior 31(2):143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, B.R., Lynch, J.A., Bevan, J.L. and Condit, C.M. (2005) Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: A focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. Social Science and Medicine 60:331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bierut, L.J., Madden, P.A.F., Breslau, N., Johnson, E.O., Hatsukami, D., Pomerleau, O. and Swan, G.E., et al. (2007) Novel genes identified in a high density genome wide association study for nicotine dependence. Journal of Human Molecular Genetics 16(1):24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bize, R., Burnand, B., Mueller, Y., Walther, M.R. and Cornuz, J. (2009) Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004705.pub3.Google Scholar
  11. Brekke, O.A. and Sirnes, T. (2011) Biosociality, biocitizenship and the new regime of hope and despair: Interpreting ‘Portraits of Hope’ and the ‘Mehmet Case.’” New Genetics and Society 30(4):347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bubela, T.M. and Caulfield, T.A. (2004) Do the print media ‘Hype’ genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canadian Medical Association Journal 170(9):1399–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, N.D. (2010) Toward a critical neuroscience of ‘Addiction.’ BioSocieties 5(1):89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. (2013) Myth: Reframing mental illness as a ‘Brain Disease’ reduces stigma. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 18(3):190–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlsten, C. and Burke, W. (2006) Potential for genetics to promote public health: Genetics research on smoking suggests caution about expectations. JAMA 296(20):2480–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Center for Drug & Alcohol Programs. (2011) Alcohol addiction.
  17. Chilibeck, G., Margaret, L. and Sehdev, M. (2011) Postgenomics, uncertain futures, and the familiarization of susceptibility genes. Social Science and Medicine 72:1768–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, A.E. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins, F. (2010) Has the revolution arrived? Nature 464(1):674–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, R.E., Wright, A.J. and Marteau, T.M. (2011) Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: A systematic review. Genetics in Medicine 13(4):273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conrad, P. (2001a) Genetic optimism: Framing genes and mental illness in the news. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 25:225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Conrad, P. and Schneider, J.W. (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Courtwright, D.T. (2010) The NIDA brain disease paradigm: History, resistance and spinoffs. BioSocieties 5(1):137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. David, S.P., Johnson, S.G., Berger, A.C., Gregory Feero, W., Terry, S.F., Green, L.A., Phillips Jr., R.L. and Ginsburg, G.S. (2015) Making personalized health care even more personalized: Insights from activities of the IOM genomics roundtable. Annals of Family Medicine 13(4):373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dingel, M.J., Ostergren, J., McCormick, J.B., Hammer, R. and Koenig, B.A. (2014) The media and behavioral genetics: Alternatives coexisting with addiction genetics. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40(4):459–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Draus, P.J. (2009) Substance abuse and slow-motion disasters: The case of Detroit. The Sociological Quarterly 50(2):360–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duster, T. (2007) A post-genomic surprise. The molecular reinscription of race in science, law and medicine. The British Journal of Sociology 66(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Easter, M. (2014) Interpreting genetics in the context of eating disorders: Evidence of disease, not diversity. Sociology of Health & Illness 36(6):840–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edwards, G. (2009) The trouble with drink: Why ideas matter. Addiction 105:797–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gamm, J.L., Nussbaum, R.L. and Bowles Biesecker, B. (2004) Genetics and alcoholism among at-risk relatives I: Perceptions of cause, risk, and control. American Journal of Medical Genetics 128A:144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Hammer, M.F., Karafet, T.M., Redd, A.J., Jarjanazi, H., Santachiara-Benerecetti, S., Soodyall, H. and Zegura, S.L. (2001) Hierarchical patterns of global human Y-chromosome diversity. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18(7):1189–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hammer, R.R., Dingel, M.J., Ostergren, J.E., Nowakowski, K.E. and Koenig, B.A. (2012) The experience of addiction as told by the addicted: Incorporating biological understandings into self-story. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 36(4):712–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hart, A.B. and Kranzler, H.R. (2015) Alcohol dependence genetics: Lessons learned from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and post-GWAS analyses. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 39(8):1312–1327.Google Scholar
  37. Hill, T., Ross, C.E. and Angel, R.J. (2005) Neighborhood disorder, psychophysiological distress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46(2):170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hishida, A., Terazawa, T., Mamiya, T., Ito, H., Matsuo, K., Tajima, K. and Hamajima, N. (2010) Efficacy of genotype notification to Japanese smokers on smoking cessation – an intervention study at workplace. Cancer Epidemiology 34:96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kalivas, P.W. and Volkow, N.D. (2005) The neural basis of addiction: A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry 162:1403–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keane, H. (2002) What’s Wrong With Addiction? Washington Square, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kvaale, E.P., Haslam, N.D. and Gottdiener, W.H. (2013) The `side effects’ of medicalization: A meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review 33(6):782–794. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine, H.G. (1978) The discovery of addiction. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 15:493–506.Google Scholar
  43. Li, C.R and Sinha, R. (2008) Inhibitory control and emotional stress regulation: Neuroimaging evidence for frontal-limbic dysfunction in psycho-stimulant addiction. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32(3):581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, C.-Y., Zhou, W.-Z., Zhang, P.-W., Johnson, C., Wei, L. and Uhl, G.R. (2011) Meta-analysis and genome-wide interpretation of genetic susceptibility to drug addiction. BMC Genomics. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-508.Google Scholar
  45. Lippman, A. (1992) Led (Astray) by genetic maps: The cartography of the human genome and health care. Social Science & Medicine 35(12):1469–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mannarini, S. and Boffo, M. (2015) Anxiety, bulimia, drug and alcohol addiction, depression, and schizophrenia: What do you think about their aetiology, dangerousness, social distance, and treatment? A latent class analysis approach. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 50(1):27–37. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0925-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marteau, T.M., French, D.P., Griffin, S.J., Prevost, A.T., Sutton, S., Watkinson, C., Attwood, S. and Hollands, G.J. (2010) Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10:CD007275.Google Scholar
  48. Mayberg, H.S. (2014) Neuroimaging and psychiatry: The long road from bench to bedside. The Hastings Center Report 44(2):S31–S36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mayo Clinic. (2007) The Disease of Addiction: Biology. Mayo Clinic.Google Scholar
  50. McBride, C.M., Bepler, G., Lipkus, I.M., Lyna, P., Samsa, G., Albright, J., Datta, S. and Rimer, B.K. (2002) Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 11(6):521–528.Google Scholar
  51. McGowan, M.L., Fishman, J. and Lambrix, M. (2010) Personal genomics and individual identities: Motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genetics and Society 29(3):261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McLoyd, V.C. (1990) The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socioeconomic development. Child Development 61:311–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meloni, M. (2014a) Biology without biologism: Social theory in a postgenomic age. Sociology 48(4):731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meloni, M. (2014b) How biology became social, and what it means for social theory. The Sociological Review 62:593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Merikangas, K.R. and Risch, N. (2003) Genomic priorities and public health. Science 302:599–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meurk, C., Hall, W., Morphett, K., Carter, A. and Lucke, J. (2013) What does ‘Acceptance’ mean? Public reflections on the idea that addiction is a brain disease. BioSocieties 8(4):491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meurk, C., Morphett, K., Carter, A., Weier, M., Lucke, J. and Hall, W. (2016) Scepticism and hope in a complex predicament: People with addictions deliberate about neuroscience. International Journal of Drug Policy 32:34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Midanik, L.T. (2004) Biomedicalization and alcohol studies: Implications for policy. Journal of Public Health Policy 25(2):211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morphett, K., Carter, A., Hall, W. and Gartner, C. (2016) A qualitative study of smokers’ views on brain-based explanations of tobacco dependence. International Journal of Drug Policy 29: 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2007) Drugs, brains and behavior: The science of addiction. National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  61. Navon, D. and Eyal, G. (2014) The trading zone of autism genetics: Examining the intersection of genomic and psychiatric classification. BioSocieties 9(3):329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Novas, C. and Rose, N. (2000) Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society 29(4):485–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ostergren, J.E., Dingel, M.J, McCormick, J.B and Koenig, B.A. (2015) Unwarranted optimism in media portrayals of genetic research on addiction overshadows critical ethical and social concerns. Journal of Health Communication 20(5):555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pescosolido, B.A., Martin, J.K., Scott Long, J., Medina, T.R., Phelan, J.C. and Link, B.G. (2010) ‘A Disease Like Any Other’? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry 167(11):1321–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Phelan, J.C. (2005) Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: The case of mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 46(4):307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Phelan, J.C. and Link, B.G. (2012) Genetics, addiction, and stigma. In: A.R. Chapman (ed.) Genetic Research on Addiction. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pickersgill, M., Martin, P. and Cunningham-Burley, S. (2014) The changing brain: Neuroscience and the enduring import of everyday experience. Public Understanding of Science 24(7): 878–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raman, S. and Tutton, R. (2010) Life, science, and biopower. Science, Technology & Human Values 35(5):711–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roberts, D. (2011) Fatal Invention. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rose, N. (2007) The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sanderson, S.C., Humphries, S.E., Hubbart, C., Hughes, E., Jarvis, M.J. and Wardle, J. (2008) Psychological and behavioural impact of genetic testing smokers for lung cancer risk. Journal of Health Psychology 13(4):481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sanderson, S.C., O’Neill, S.C., Bastian, L., Bepler, G. and McBride, C.M. (2010) what can interest tell us about uptake of genetic testing? Intention and behavior amongst smokers related to patients with lung cancer. Public Health Genomics 13(2):116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sanderson, S.C., O’Neill, S.C., Brown White, D., Bepler, G., Bastian, L., Lipkus, I.M. and McBride, C.M. (2009) Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: A pilot study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 18(7):1953–1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schnittker, J. (2008) An uncertain revolution: Why the rise of a genetic model of mental illness has not increased tolerance. Social Science & Medicine 67:1370–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schnoll, R.A., Johnson, T.A. and Lerman, C. (2007) Genetics and smoking behavior. Current Psychiatry Reports 9(5):349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schomerus, G., Holzinger, A., Matschinger, H., Lucht ,M. and Angermeyer, M.C. (2010) Public attitudes towards alcohol dependence an overview. Psychiatrische Praxis 37(3):111–118. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1223438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schuckit, MA. (2014) A brief history of research on the genetics of alcohol and other drug use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 17:59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sharon, T. (2014) Human nature in an age of biotechnology: The case for mediated posthumanism. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 14.Google Scholar
  79. Shiloh, S. (2006) Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: A theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling 15(5):325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shostak, S. (2013) Exposed Science: Genes, the Environment, and the Politics of Population Health. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thomas, D. (2010) Gene-environment-wide association studies: Emerging approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 11(April):259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thorgeirsson, T., Gudbjartsson, D.F., Surakka, I., Vink, J.M., Amin, N. and Geller, F., et al. (2010) Sequence variants at CHRNB3-CHRNA6 and CYP2A6 affect smoking behavior. Nature Genetics 42(5):448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Veltman, J.A. and Lupski, J.R. (2015) From genes to genomes in the clinic. Genome Medicine 7:78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vrecko, S. (2010) ‘Civilizing Technologies’ and the control of deviance. BioSocieties 5(1):36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang, Z.-Y., Fu, L.-Y. and Zhang, H.-Y. (2012) Can medical genetics and evolutionary biology inspire drug target identification? Trends in Molecular Medicine 18(2):69–71. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Webb, T.L. and Seeran, P. (2006) Does changing behavioral intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin 132(2):249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Molly J. Dingel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jenny Ostergren
    • 2
  • Kathleen Heaney
    • 3
  • Barbara A. Koenig
    • 4
  • Jennifer McCormick
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Minnesota Rochester300 University SquareRochesterUSA
  2. 2.University of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Hennepin County Medical CenterMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Health & AgingUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Pennsylvania State UniversityHersheyUSA

Personalised recommendations