Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 182–189 | Cite as

No room for ‘playa haters’ in interdisciplinary collaborations

Felicity Callard and Des Fitzgerald Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2015, $0 (e-book) or $19.23 (paperback), ISBN: 9781137407962
  • Matthew WadeEmail author
Books Forum

Want to be an interdisciplinarian? For a start, don’t be a ‘playa hater’ of other successful scholars, just get in the game with them. Also, forget about ‘parity’ and realising some ‘frictionless imaginary’ of collaboration, for there will invariably be imbalances of power and influence. Don’t filter all exchanges through your ‘home’ discipline, nor insist that others be representative of everything that is right or wrong with their own. Note that if you are firmly committed to interdisciplinary engagement there is a good chance you may be the comparatively ‘weaker’ participant, so be prepared to take on the bulk of the ‘nitty-gritty’ labour and administrative ‘housework’, not to mention the affective labour required to sustain such fragile assemblages. Finally, if compelling forces prescribe certain conditions your interdisciplinary endeavour must abide – i.e. what specialities must be incorporated, which tools must be privileged, where your findings appear – understand that there...

References

  1. Bromham, L., Dinnage, R. and Hua, X. (2016) Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature 534: 684–687. doi: 10.1038/nature18315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callard, F., Fitzgerald, D. and Woods, A. (2015) Interdisciplinary collaboration in action: Tracking the signal, tracing the noise. Palgrave Communications. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2015.19.Google Scholar
  3. Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. (2015) Social science and neuroscience beyond interdisciplinarity: Experimental entanglements. Theory, Culture & Society 32(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fitzgerald, D., Rose, N. and Singh, I. (2016) Revitalizing sociology: Urban life and mental illness between history and the present. British Journal of Sociology 67(1): 138–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Littlefield, M.M., Fitzgerald, D., Knudsen, K.J., Tonks, J. and Dietz, M.J. (2014) Contextualizing neuro-collaborations: Reflections on a transdisciplinary fMRI lie detection experiment. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Metzinger, T. (2009) The Ego Tunnel. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Meyer, M. (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication 32(1): 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Persson, I. and Savulescu, J. (2012) Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rose, N. 1999 [1990]. Governing the Soul. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Strathern, M. (2010) Ars synthetica: A rehearsal. BioSocieties 5: 393–395. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2010.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilson, E.A. (2015) Gut Feminism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sociology, College of Arts and Social SciencesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations