Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The vertical keiretsu advantage in the era of Westernization in the Japanese automobile industry: investigation from transaction cost economics and a resource-based view

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertical keiretsu are specific buyer–supplier relationships that define the structure of firms in the Japanese automotive industry. However, during Japan’s economic recession, firms started restructuring their relationships, which raised the question of whether automakers maintained transactions with their keiretsu suppliers or pursued new transactions outside of keiretsu. Applying two fundamental theories, transaction cost economics and the resource-based view, we investigate parts transactions in the Japanese automobile industry, and show that keiretsu suppliers maintained business with their keiretsu automakers. Our results suggest long-term vertical corporate linkage endows suppliers with a competitive advantage, even when arm’s length transactions prevail in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abegglen, J. C., & Stalk, G. (1985). Kaisha, the Japanese corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science,12(2), 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadjian, C. L., & Lincoln, J. R. (2001). Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry. Organization Science,12(6), 683–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M., & Dore, R. P. (1994). The Japanese firm: The sources of competitive strength. Clarendon Paperbacks, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Aoki, K., & Lennerfors, T. T. (2013a). Whither Japanese keiretsu? The transformation of vertical keiretsu in Toyota, Nissan and Honda 1991–2011. Asia Pacific Business Review,19(1), 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, K., & Lennerfors, T. T. (2013b). The new, improved keiretsu. Harvard Business Review,91(9), 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2017). The role of ambidexterity in managing buyer-supplier relationships: The Toyota case. Organization Science,28(6), 1080–1097.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama, Y. (2000). Networks, keiretsu, and locations of the Japanese electronics industry in Asia. Environment and Planning A,32(2), 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asanuma, B. (1989). Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,3(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. M. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartnik, R., Wilhelm, M., & Fujimoto, T. (2018). Introduction to innovation in the East Asian automotive industry: Exploring the interplay between product architectures, firm strategies, and national innovation systems. Technovation,70–71, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L. (2000). Vertical keiretsu and knowledge spillovers in Japanese manufacturing: An empirical assessment. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,14(2), 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. (2013). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies,44(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, L. E., Gao, Y., & Napshin, S. (2014). Keiretsu centrality—profits and profit stability: A power dependence perspective. Journal of Business Research,67(12), 2603–2610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business, N., Automotive, N., & Trendy, N. (2016). Husei no meikyu Mitsubishi Motors. Tokyo: Nikkei BP. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatain, O. (2011). Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management Journal,32(1), 76–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. S., Su, H. C., & Ro, Y. K. (2017). The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the US auto industry: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Production Economics,184, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Brighton: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science,7(5), 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A., & Takeishi, A. (1991). Supplier relations and management: A survey of Japanese, Japanese-transplant, and US auto plants. Strategic Management Journal,12(8), 563–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daidj, N. (2014). The evolution of trust in Japan: The case of vertical keiretsu groups. In I. Samanta (Ed.), Strategic marketing in fragile economic conditions. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daidj, N. (2016). The evolution of corporate governance in Japan: The case of vertical keiretsu groups. In D. Crowther & G. Aras (Eds.), Global perspectives on corporate governance and CSR. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (2000). The theory of the firm revisited. In J. Williamson & S. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science,35(12), 1504–1511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 535–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies,31(2), 259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. (2006). Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal,27(8), 701–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal,21, 345–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (2001). The Japanese automobile parts supplier system: The triplet of effective inter-firm routines. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management,1(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal,49(3), 519–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, K., & Ambler, T. (1999). The dark side of long-term relationships in marketing services. Journal of Marketing Research,36, 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., & Bechte, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management,31, 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helper, S. (1991). How much has really changed between US automakers and their suppliers? Sloan Management Review,32(4), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1995). National institutional structures, transaction cost economizing, and competitive advantage: The case of Japan. Organization Science,6(1), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Xu, K., & Carnes, C. M. (2016). Resource based theory in operations management research. Journal of Operations Management,41, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzhausen, A. (2002). Japanese supplier relationships under pressure: Restructuring of the car industry in the 1990s. Management International Review,42, 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., MacDuffie, J. P., Tae, C. J. (2016). Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1942–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, M. P., Mahoney, J. T., & Tan, D. (2009). Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management Journal,30(2), 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T., Nunes, B., & Dey, P. K. (2016). Is keiretsu really a source of competitive advantage for Japanese automotive suppliers? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,27(1), 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal,43(3), 268–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kher, H. V., Kydd, C. T., & O’Brien, T. M. (2017). Evolution of product quality in European, Japanese and US automotive firms: An exploratory longitudinal analysis. Omega,73, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konno, Y. (2004). Historical trends of Japanese automotive supplier system. Sangyo Gakkai Kenkyu Nenpo,19, 69–78. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal,24(4), 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamming, R. (2000). Japanese supply chain relationships in recession. Long Range Planning,33(6), 757–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (1992). Transaction-cost economics in real time. Industrial and Corporate Change,1(1), 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K., Kamath, R., Wasti, N., & Nagamichi, M. (1996). Supplier involvement in automotive component design: Are there really large U.S./Japan differences? Research Policy,25, 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. W., Wu, L. Y., & Chiou, J. S. (2017). The use of asset specific investments to increase customer dependence: A study of OEM suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management,67, 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, J. R., Ahmadjian, C. L., & Mason, E. (1998). Organizational learning and purchase-supply relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota compared. California Management Review,40(3), 241–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manabe, S., Fujisue, K., & Kurokawa, S. (2005). A comparative analysis of EDI integration in US and Japanese automobile suppliers. International Journal of Technology Management,30(3–4), 389–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J., & Dow, S. (2009). Japanese keiretsu: Past, present, future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,26(2), 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIvor, R. (2013). Understanding the manufacturing location decision: The case for the transaction cost and capability perspectives. Journal of Supply Chain Management,49(2), 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, L. F., Anand, J., & Brush, T. H. (2008). Comparing the resource-based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strategic Management Journal,29(9), 913–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal,30(1), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, Y., & Ramseyer, J. M. (2006). Japanese industrial finance at the close of the 19th century: Trade credit and financial intermediation. Explorations in Economic History,43(1), 94–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morita, H., & Nakahara, H. (2004). Impacts of the information-technology revolution on Japanese manufacturer-supplier relationships. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,18(3), 390–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motous, P. & Todo. Y. (2015). Dissolve the keiretsu, or die: A longitudinal study of disintermediation in the Japanese automobile manufacturing supply networks. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 15-E-039.

  • Nagaoka, S., Takeishi, A., & Noro, Y. (2008). Determinants of firm boundaries: Empirical analysis of the Japanese auto industry from 1984 to 2002. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,22(2), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal,28(2), 121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikkei Sangyo Shinbun. (2017). Sunroof ni airbag. Nikkei Sangyo Shinbun. (in Japanese).

  • Nishiguchi, T. (1994). Strategic industrial sourcing: The Japanese advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiguchi, T., & Beaudet, A. (1998). The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. Sloan Management Review,40(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobeoka, K., Dyer, J. H., & Madhok, A. (2002). The influence of customer scope on supplier learning and performance in the Japanese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies,33(4), 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. P., David, P., Yoshikawa, T., & Delios, A. (2014). How capital structure influences diversification performance: A transaction cost perspective. Strategic Management Journal,35(7), 1013–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology,98(4), 829–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2016). When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management Journal,37(4), 724–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remneland-Wikhamn, B., & Knights, D. (2012). Transaction cost economics and open innovation: Implications for theory and practice. Creativity and Innovation Management,21(3), 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M. (1996). Suppliers’ associations in the Japanese automobile industry: Collective action for technology diffusion. Cambridge Journal of Economics,20(6), 651–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M., & Helper, S. (1998). Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,34(3), 387–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J., & Keil, T. (2013). What makes a resource valuable? Identifying the drivers of firm-idiosyncratic resource value. Academy of Management Review,38(2), 206–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solis, M. (2003). On the myth of the keiretsu network: Japanese electronics in North America. Business and Politics,5(3), 303–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal,21(8), 791–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A. (2002). Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organization Science, 13(3), 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1(3), 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todo, Y., Nakajima, K., & Matous, P. (2015). How do supply chain networks affect the resilience of firms to natural disasters? Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of Regional Science,55(2), 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, J. G., Yang, C., & Sheu, C. (2016). A transaction cost economics model for estimating performance effectiveness of relational and contractual governance: Theory and statistical results. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,36(11), 1551–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenberger, F. (2016). Keiretsu. In P. Haghirian (Ed.), Routledge handbook of Japanese business and management. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., & Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly,29(3), 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, J. M., Wiedmer, R., & Boyer, K. (2015). A dyadic investigation of collaborative competence, social capital, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management,51(2), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M. M. (2011). Managing co-opetition through horizontal supply chain relations: Linking dyadic and network levels of analysis. Journal of Operations Management,29(7), 663–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M. M., & Kohlbacher, F. (2011). Co-opetition and knowledge co-creation in Japanese supplier-networks: The case of Toyota. Asian Business & Management,10(1), 66–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, M., & Sydow, J. (2018). Managing coopetition in supplier networks–A paradox perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management,54(3), 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (2017). Contract, governance and transaction cost economics. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). Machine that changed the world. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Ho, E., & Chang, A. (2012). Integrating the resource-based view and transaction cost economics in immigrant business performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,29(3), 753–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeniyurt, S., Henke, J. W., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of supplier involvement in buyers’ new product development: Working relations, inter-dependence, co-innovation, and performance outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,42(3), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T., & McGuire, J. (2008). Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,25(1), 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Henke, J. W., Jr., & Viswanathan, S. (2015). Reciprocity between buyer cost sharing and supplier technology sharing. International Journal of Production Economics,163, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, W., Su, C., Peng, J., & Yang, Z. (2017). Trust in interorganizational relationships: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Management,43(4), 1050–1075.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K03889, and the Academic Association for Organizational Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, Sophia University, 7-1 Kioi-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8554, Japan

    Genjiro Kosaka

  2. Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University, 1-7 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-0043, Japan

    Koichi Nakagawa

  3. Faculty of International Social Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-4 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 240-8501, Japan

    Seiji Manabe

  4. College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1, Noji-Higashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8577, Japan

    Mizuki Kobayashi

Authors
  1. Genjiro Kosaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koichi Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seiji Manabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mizuki Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genjiro Kosaka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kosaka, G., Nakagawa, K., Manabe, S. et al. The vertical keiretsu advantage in the era of Westernization in the Japanese automobile industry: investigation from transaction cost economics and a resource-based view. Asian Bus Manage 19, 36–61 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00074-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00074-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation