Asian Business & Management

, Volume 16, Issue 4–5, pp 253–271 | Cite as

Overcoming country-of-origin image constraints on hiring: the moderating role of CSR

Research Article

Abstract

Unfavorable home country images pose challenges in attracting talent abroad for emerging-market multinational enterprises (EMNEs). Drawing on signaling theory, this study suggests CSR activities may be a strategic way for EMNEs to overcome this issue. An experiment involving 189 Korean job-seekers showed that while they are more likely to pursue jobs with US than with Chinese firms, positive CSR activities have a demonstrably stronger impact on application intentions toward Chinese firms compared to US firms. CSR may thus be instrumental in helping EMNEs secure access to human resources abroad.

Keywords

Country-of-origin image Country of origin Applicant attraction CSR Emerging market multinational enterprises Signaling theory 

References

  1. Allred, A., Chakraborty, G., and Miller, S. J. 2000. Measuring images of developing countries: A scale development study. Journal of Euromarketing 8 (3): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth, D., and Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 20–39.Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S. 2004. Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International 9(5): 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, A.E. (1998) Recruiting Employees: Individual and Organizational Perspectives. London & New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Baum, M., and Kabst, R. 2013. How to attract applicants in the Atlantic versus the Asia-Pacific region? A cross-national analysis on China, India, Germany, and Hungary. Journal of World Business 48 (2): 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berthon, P., Ewing, M., and Hah, L. L. 2005. Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising 24 (2): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botero, I. C. 2014. Effects of communicating family ownership and organisational size on an applicant’s attraction to a firm: An empirical examination in the USA and China. Journal of Family Business Strategy 5 (2): 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, T.J., and Dacin, P. A. 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cable, D.M., and Turban, D.B. (2001) Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job-seekers’ employer knowledge during recruitment. In: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, ed. G.R. Ferris, 115–163. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497–505.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34 (4): 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll, A. B., and Shabana, K. M. 2010. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., and Jones, D. A. 2005. Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology 90 (5): 928–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, M. 2004. Asian Management Systems: Chinese, Japanese and Korean Styles of Business. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, C. J., and Stevens, C. K. 2002. The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor-market entrants: A brand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (6): 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlsrud, A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–91.Google Scholar
  18. Duarte, A.P., Gomes, D.R., and das Neves, J.G. 2014. Tell me your socially responsible practices, I will tell you how attractive for recruitment you are! The impact of perceived CSR on organizational attractiveness. TékhneReview of Applied Management Studies 12 (1): 22–29.Google Scholar
  19. Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., and Park, D. 2008. Old wine in new bottles: A comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed-country TNCs thirty years ago. In: The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity, ed. K.P. Sauvant, 158–180. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Ehrhart, K. H., and Ziegert, J. C. 2005. Why are individuals attracted to organizations? Journal of Management 31 (6): 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, W. R., and Davis, W. D. 2011. An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Business & Society 50(3): 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Froese, F. J., and Kishi, Y. 2013. Organizational attractiveness of foreign firms in Asia: Soft power matters. Asian Business & Management 12 (3): 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Froese, F. J., Vo, A., and Garrett, T. C. 2010. Organizational attractiveness of foreign-based companies: A country-of-origin perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 18 (3): 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gammeltoft, P., Barnard, H., and Madhok, A. 2010. Emerging multinationals, emerging theory: Macro-and micro-level perspectives. Journal of International Management 16 (2): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., and Lautenschlager, G. J. 1993. Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greening, D. W., and Turban, D. B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society 39 (3): 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Held, K., and Bader, D. 2016. The influence of images on organizational attractiveness: Comparing Chinese, Russian and US companies in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2016.1173085.
  28. Herz, M. F., and Diamantopoulos, A. 2013. Country-specific associations made by consumers: A dual-coding theory perspective. Journal of International Marketing 21 (3): 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., and Sinar, E.F. 2003. Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63 (6): 986–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Highhouse, S., Thornbury, E. E., and Little, I. S. 2007. Social-identity functions of attraction to organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103 (1): 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holtbrügge, D., and Kreppel, H. 2015. Employer attractiveness of Chinese, Indian and Russian firms in Germany: Signaling effects of HR practices. Corporate Reputation Review 18 (3): 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., and Madey, S. 2014. Why are job-seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 57 (2): 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keller, K. L. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, S. Y., and Park, H. 2011. Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4): 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koschate-Fischer, N., Diamantopoulos, A., and Oldenkotte, K. 2012. Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. Journal of International Marketing 20 (1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laroche, M., Papadopoulos, N., Heslop, L. A., and Mourali, M. 2005. The influence of country image structure on consumer evaluations of foreign products. International Marketing Review 22 (1): 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, D., Wang, C. L., Jiang, Y., Barnes, B. R., and Zhang, H. 2014. The asymmetric influence of cognitive and affective country image on rational and experiential purchases. European Journal of Marketing 48 (11/12): 2153–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lievens, F., and Highhouse, S. 2003. The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology 56 (1): 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo, Y., and Tung, R. L. 2007. International expansion of emerging-market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38 (4): 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Madhok, A., and Keyhani, M. 2012. Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal 2 (1): 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Magnusson, P., Krishnan, V., Westjohn, S. A., and Zdravkovic, S. 2014. The spillover effects of prototype brand transgressions on country image and related brands. Journal of International Marketing 22 (1): 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martin, I. M., and Eroglu, S. 1993. Measuring a multi-dimensional construct: Country image. Journal of Business Research 28 (3): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matten, D., and Moon, J. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33 (2): 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melnyk, V., Klein, K., and Völckner, F. 2012. The double-edged sword of foreign brand names for companies from emerging countries. Journal of Marketing 76 (6): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. A., and Belkin, L. Y. 2006. Organizational attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder: The interaction of demographic characteristics with foreignness. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (5): 666–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. A., and Sanchez, J. I. 2014. Employer attractiveness in Latin America: The association among foreignness, internationalization and talent recruitment. Journal of International Management 20 (3): 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramachandran, J., and Pant, A. 2010. The liabilities of origin: An emerging-economy perspective on the costs of doing business abroad. In: Advances in International Management: The Past, Present and Future of International Business and Management, ed. T.M. Devinney, T. Pedersen and L. Tihanyi, 231–265. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  48. Rhee, M., and Haunschild, P. R. 2006. The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the US automobile industry. Organization Science 17 (1): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roth, K. P., and Diamantopoulos, A. 2009. Advancing the country image construct. Journal of Business Research 62 (7): 726–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., and Skarlicki, D. P. 2013. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology 66 (4): 895–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rynes, S. L. 1991. Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions. In: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough, 399–444. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  52. Saleem, F. Z., and Iglesias, O. 2016. Mapping the domain of the fragmented field of internal branding. Journal of Product & Brand Management 25 (1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwartz, M. S., and Carroll, A. B. 2003. Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4): 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Turban, D. B., and Greening, D. W. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilkinson, A., Wood, G., and Demirbag, M. 2014. Guest editors’ introduction: People management and emerging market multinationals. Human Resource Management 53 (6): 835–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaheer, S. 1995 Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal 38 (2): 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang, L., and Gowan, M. A. 2012. Corporate social responsibility, applicants’ individual traits, and organizational attraction: A person–organization fit perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology 27 (3): 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Hispanic StudiesKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Korea University Business SchoolSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations