Advertisement

Career gatekeeping in cultural fields

  • Julian HamannEmail author
  • Stefan Beljean
Original Article

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of career gatekeeping processes in two cultural fields. Drawing on data on appointment procedures in German academia and booking processes in North American stand-up comedy, we compare how gatekeepers in two widely different contexts evaluate and select candidates for established positions in their respective field and validate their decisions. Focusing on three types of gatekeeping practices that have been documented in prior research—typecasting, comparison, and legitimization—our analysis reveals major differences in how gatekeepers perform these practices across our two cases: (1) typecasting based on ascriptive categories versus professional criteria, (2) comparisons that are ad-hoc and holistic versus systematic and guided by performance criteria, and (3) legitimation by means of ritualization versus transparency. We argue that these differences are related to the social and organizational context in which gatekeepers make selection decisions, including differences in the structure of academic and creative careers and the organization of the respective labor markets in which these careers unfold. These findings contribute to scholarship on gatekeeping in cultural fields by providing comparative insights into the work of career gatekeepers and the social organization of career gatekeeping processes.

Keywords

Gatekeeping Academia Comedy Typecasting Comparison Legitimation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Michèle Lamont, Matthew Clair, Désirée Waibel and the members of the ISF group in the Department of Sociology at Harvard for their comments on previous versions of this paper. We also would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editors of AJCS for their comments and suggestions. Research support from German Research Foundation (Project Number 254562991), and the Canada Program at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs at Harvard University is gratefully acknowledged. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2017 meeting of the American Sociological Association.

References

  1. Alexander, J.C. 2004. Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy. Sociological Theory 22 (4): 527–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J.C., and P. Smith. 2003. The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics. In The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology, ed. J.C. Alexander, 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angermuller, J. 2017. Academic Careers and the Valuation of Academics. A Discursive Perspective on Status Categories and Academic Salaries in France as Compared to the U.S., Germany and Great Britain. Higher Education 73 (6): 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechky, B.A., and S. O’Mahony. 2015. Leveraging Comparative Field Data for Theory Generation. In Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research. Innovative Pathways and Methods, ed. K.D. Elsbach and R.M. Kramer, 168–176. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bessy, C., and P.-M. Chauvin. 2013. The Power of Market Intermediaries: From Information to Valuation Processes. Valuation Studies 1 (1): 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bielby, W.T., and D.D. Bielby. 1994. All Hits are Flukes. Institutionalized Decision-Making and the Rhetoric of Network Prime-Time Program Development. American Journal of Sociology 99 (5): 1287–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bielby, W.T., and D.D. Bielby. 1999. Organizational Mediation of Project-Based Labor Markets: Talent Agencies and the Careers of Screenwriters. American Sociological Review 64 (1): 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bystryn, M. 1978. Art Galleries as Gatekeepers. Social Research 1978 (45): 390–408.Google Scholar
  10. Cattani, G., S. Ferriani, and P.D. Allison. 2014. Insiders, Outsiders, and the Struggle for Consecration in Cultural Fields. A Core-Periphery Perspective. American Sociological Review 79 (2): 258–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Childress, C., and J.-F. Nault. 2018. Encultured Biases: The Role of Products in Pathways to Inequality. American Sociological Review 84 (1): 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chong, P.K. 2013. Legitimate Judgment in Art, the Scientific World Reversed? Maintaining Critical Distance in Evaluation. Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chong, P., Lamont, M., and Bourgoin A. (2019) The Blackboxing of Expert Judgment: Fiction Reviewing, Scholarly Evaluation and Management Consulting, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  14. Clayman, S.E., and A. Reisner. 1998. Gatekeeping in Action: Editorial Conferences and Assessments of Newsworthiness. American Sociological Review 63 (2): 178–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corra, M., and D. Willer. 2002. The Gatekeeper. Sociological Theory 20 (2): 180–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darr, A., and A. Mears. 2017. Locating Local Knowledge in Global Networks: Scouting in Fashion and Football. Poetics 62 (2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowd, T.J., and D.L. Pinheiro. 2013. The Ties Among the Notes: The Social Capital of Jazz Musicians in Three Metro Areas. Work and Occupations 40 (4): 431–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubois, S., and P. François. 2013. Career Paths and Hierarchies in the Pure Pole of the Literary Field: The Case of Contemporary Poetry. Poetics 41 (5): 501–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faulkner, R.R. 1983. Music on Demand: Composers and Careers in the Hollywood Film Industry. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  21. Flyverbom, M., L.T. Christensen, and Hansen H. Krause. 2015. The Transparency-Power Nexus: Observational and Regularizing Control. Management Communication Quarterly 29 (3): 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster, P., S.P. Borgatti, and C. Jones. 2011. Gatekeeper Search and Selection Strategies: Relational and Network Governance in a Cultural Market. Poetics 39 (4): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franssen, T.P., and G. Kuipers. 2013. Coping with Uncertainty, Abundance and Strife: Decision-Making Processes of Dutch Acquisition Editors in the Global Market for Translations. Poetics 41 (1): 48–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, S. 2014. The Hidden Tastemakers: Comedy Scouts as Cultural Brokers at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. Poetics 44 (2014): 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedman, S., and D. O’Brien. 2017. Resistance and Resignation: Responses to Typecasting in British Acting. Cultural Sociology 11 (3): 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Godart, F.C., and A. Mears. 2009. How Do Cultural Producers Make Creative Decisions? Lessons from the Catwalk. Social Forces 88 (2): 671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenfeld, L. 1988. Professional Ideologies and Patterns of ‘Gatekeeping’: Evaluation and Judgment Within Two Art Worlds. Social Forces 66 (4): 903–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guetzkow, J., M. Lamont, and G. Mallard. 2004. What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? American Sociological Review 69 (2): 190–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirschauer, S. 2010. Editorial Judgements: A Praxeology of ‘Voting’ in Peer Review. Social Studies of Science 40 (1): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssen, S., and M. Verboord. 2015. Cultural Mediators and Gatekeepers. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. J.D. Wright, 440–446. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khaire, M. 2017. Culture and Commerce: The Value of Entrepreneurship in Creative Industries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klawitter, M. 2015. Effects of Institutional Changes on Requirements for Vacant Professorships in Germany. Working Papers in Higher Education Studies 1 (2): 1–19.Google Scholar
  34. Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think. Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamont, M. 2012. Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38 (21): 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lamont, M., and A. Swidler. 2014. Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing. Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lane, C. 2013. Taste Makers in the “Fine-Dining” Restaurant Industry: The Attribution of Aesthetic and Economic Value by Gastronomic Guides. Poetics 41 (4): 342–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leschziner, V., and A.I. Green. 2013. Thinking About Food and Sex: Deliberate Cognition in the Routine Practices of a Field. Sociological Theory 31 (2): 116–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewin, K. 1943. Forces Behind Food Habits and Methods of Change. Bulletin of the National Research Council 108: 35–65.Google Scholar
  40. Lincke, H.-J., and S. Paletschek. 2002. Situation des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses im Fach Geschichte: Berufungsaussichten und Karrierestadien von Historikern und Historikerinnen an deutschen Universitäten Ergebnisse einer Erhebung im Jahr 2002. Manuskript: Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
  41. McCarthy, S.L. (2016) Nick Brazao, Just for Laughs New Faces and Off-JFL Producer. The Comic’s Comic. http://thecomicscomic.com/2016/05/30/episode-93-nick-brazao-just-for-laughs-new-faces-and-off-jfl-producer. Accessed 18 June 2019.
  42. Mears, A. 2014. Seeing Culture Through the Eye of the Beholder: Four Methods in Pursuit of Taste. Poetics 43 (3): 291–309.Google Scholar
  43. Menger, P.-M. 2014. The Economics of Creativity. Art and Achievement Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merton, R.K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159 (3810): 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Möhlmann, S. 2014. Autonomie konkret: die Ruferteilung. Wer beruft nach welchem. Forschung & Lehre 10 (2014): 808–809.Google Scholar
  46. Muniesa, F., and C.-F. Helgesson. 2013. Valuation Studies and the Spectacle of Valuation. Valuation Studies 1 (2): 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Musselin, C. 2010. The Market for Academics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Nylander, E. 2014. Mastering the Jazz Standard. Sayings and Doings of Artistic Valuation. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 2 (1): 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Posselt, J.R. 2016. Inside Graduate Admissions. Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Prior, L. 2008. Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology 42 (5): 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prior, L. 2012. Using Documents in Research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Reilly, P.M. 2017. The Layers of a Clown. Career Development in Cultural Production Industries. Academy of Management Discoveries 3 (2): 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roussel, V., and D.D. Bielby. 2015. Brokerage and Production in the American and French Entertainment Industries: Invisible Hands in Cultural Markets. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  55. Shoemaker, P.J., and T. Vos. 2009. Gatekeeping Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs. Organization 19 (4): 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2014. Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment. Journal of Management Studies 51 (3): 460–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Velthuis, O. 2003. Symbolic Meanings of Prices: Constructing the Value of Contemporary Art in Amsterdam and New York Galleries. Theory and Society 32 (2): 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verboord, M. 2011. Market Logic and Cultural Consecration in French, German and American Bestseller Lists, 1970-2007. Poetics 39 (4): 290–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Verdaasdonk, H. 2001. Reviews, Critics, and Cultural Gatekeepers. In International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. N.J. Smelser and P.B. Baltes, 13295–13299. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vermurlen, B. 2016. Structural Overlap and the Management of Cultural Marginality: The Case of Calvinist Hip-Hop. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 4 (1): 68–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zuckerman, E.W. 2012. Construction, Concentration, and (Dis)Continuities in Social Valuations. Annual Review of Sociology 38 (2012): 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zuckerman, E.W., T.-Y. Kim, K. Ukanwa, et al. 2003. Robust Identities or Nonentities? Typecasting in the Feature-Film Labor Market. American Journal of Sociology 108 (5): 1018–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LCSS Leibniz Center for Science and SocietyLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations