Skip to main content
Log in

The fragmenting of the civil sphere: How partisan identity shapes the moral evaluation of candidates and epistemology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cultural Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 2016 U.S. presidential election upended a number of scholarly expectations about electoral politics. Many academics and pundits predicted that president Donald Trump’s flaunting of democratic norms, from his rhetoric on the campaign trail to his financial conflicts of interest, would undermine his candidacy. How do we explain Trump’s appeal to his core supporters and Republicans more generally? First, this paper argues that Trump was able to exploit partisan identity becoming the key basis for moral evaluation among the democratic public. Second, this paper argues that partisan identity has fractured civic epistemology, the basis upon which people understand and agree upon political facts and truths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramowitz, A.I. and Webster, S. (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of US elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies 41: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J.C. (2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Alexander, J.C. (2010) The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. Oxford University Press.

  • Alexander, J.C., Breese, E.B. and Luengo, M. (eds.) (2016) The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.

  • Anderson, C.W. (2013) Rebuilding the News: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Temple University.

  • Carlson, M. (2016) Telling the crisis story of journalism: Narratives of normative reassurance in Page One. The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future, pp. 135–152.

  • Carlson, M. and Lewis, S.C. (eds.) (2015) Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Routledge.

  • Cetina, K.K. (2009) What is a pipe? Obama and the sociological imagination. Theory, Culture & Society 26(5): 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, G. (2016) on truth and lies in a pragmatic, performative sense (with my respects to nietzsche), AKA: Reality needs a better PR Department. Paper presentation at the American Anthropological Association.

  • Cook, T.E. (1998) Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. University of Chicago Press.

  • Deuze, M. (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism 6(4): 442–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, J.S. and Glasser, T.L. (1998) Custodians of Conscience: Investigative Journalism and Public Virtue. Columbia University Press.

  • Fiorina, M.P. (2013) America’s polarized politics: Causes and solutions. Perspectives on Politics 11(3): 852–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, D.J., Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J. (2017) The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology 38(S1): 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. (2016) Political frauds, donald trump, and the ghost of totalitarianism. Knowledge Cultures 4(5): 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. (2016) Deciding What’s True: The Rise of Political Fact-Checking in American Journalism. Columbia University Press.

  • Green, D.P., Palmquist, B. and Schickler, E. (2004) Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Yale University Press.

  • Hart, P.S. and Nisbet, E.C. (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research 39(6): 701–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmer, N. (2016) Messengers of the Right: Conservative Media and the Transformation of American Politics. University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Hersh, E.D. and Goldenberg, M.N. (2016) Democratic and Republican physicians provide different care on politicized health issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(42): 11811–11816.

  • Hochschild, A.R. (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New Press.

  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G. and Lelkes, Y. (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R.N. and Townsley, E. (2011) The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. Oxford University Press.

  • Jasanoff, S. (2011) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.

  • Kreiss, D. (2015). The problem of citizens: E-democracy for actually existing democracy. Social Media + Society 1(2): 2056305115616151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D.M. (2015) What is the ‘science of science communication’? Journal of Science Communication 14(3): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D.M. (2016) The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D. (2016) Beyond administrative journalism: Civic skepticism and the crisis in journalism. The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Democratic Culture, Professional Codes, Digital Future, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J.M. (2011) Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton University Press.

  • Levendusky, M. (2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.

  • Mast, J.L. (2012) The Performative Presidency: Crisis and Resurrection During the Clinton Years. Cambridge University Press.

  • Mast, J.L. (2016) Action in culture: Act I of the presidential primary campaign in the US, April to December, 2015. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 4(3): 241–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. and Kloos, K. (2014). Deeply Divided: Racial Politics and Social Movements in Post-War America. Oxford University Press.

  • New York Times. (2016) Election 2016: Exit Polls. The New York Times, November 8, http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html?_r=0, accessed June 29, 2016.

  • Nielsen, R.K. (2014) The many crises of Western journalism: A comparative analysis of economic, professional, and simbolic crises. In: The Crisis of Journalism Reconsidered: Cultural Power.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2011) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.

  • Pew Research Center. (2017) 2016 Election: The latest facts, figures and public opinion shaping the 2016 presidential election. http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/2016-election/, accessed June 30, 2017.

  • Romney, M. (2016) Mitt Romney Speaks Out Against Donald Trump. Bing, March 3. https://binged.it/2jpw1QP, accessed June 29, 2017.

  • Schudson, M. and Anderson, C., (2009) Objectivity, professionalism, and truth seeking in journalism. The Handbook of Journalism Studies, pp. 88–101.

  • Schudson, M. (1998) The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Free Press.

  • Schudson, M. (1981) Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. Basic Books.

  • Sides, J. and Farrell, F. (eds.) (2016) The Science of Trump: Explaining the Rise of an Unlikely Candidate. Amazon Kindle, 2016. http://amzn.to/2afw80o, accessed June 29, 2017.

  • Slothuus, R. and de Vreese, C.H. (2010) Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. The Journal of Politics 72(3): 630–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, G. (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology 77(4): 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, S. (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 41: 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, S. (2016) A conceptual critique of the cultural cognition thesis. Science Communication 38(1): 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YouGov. (2016) Belief in conspiracies largely depends on political identity. https://today.yougov.com/news/2016/12/27/belief-conspiracies-largely-depends-political-iden/, accessed June 30, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Kreiss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreiss, D. The fragmenting of the civil sphere: How partisan identity shapes the moral evaluation of candidates and epistemology. Am J Cult Sociol 5, 443–459 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0039-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-017-0039-5

Keywords

Navigation