Why there is less supportive evidence for contact theory than they say there is: A quantitative cultural–sociological critique

  • Katerina Manevska
  • Peter Achterberg
  • Dick Houtman
Original Article

Abstract

The finding that ethnic prejudice is particularly weakly developed among those with interethnic friendships is often construed as confirming the so-called ‘contact theory,’ which holds that interethnic contact reduces racial prejudice. This theory raises cultural–sociological suspicions, however, because of its tendency to reduce culture to an allegedly ‘more fundamental’ realm of social interaction. Analyzing data from the first wave of the European Social Survey, we therefore test the theory alongside an alternative cultural–sociological theory about culturally driven processes of contact selection. We find that whereas interethnic friendships are indeed culturally driven, which confirms our cultural–sociological theory, contacts with neighbors and colleagues do indeed affect ethnic prejudice. They do so in a manner that is more complex and more culturally sensitive than contact theory suggests, however: while positive cultural stances vis-à-vis ethnic diversity lead interethnic contact to decrease ethnic prejudice, negative ones rather lead the former to increase the latter.

Keywords

interethnic contact ethnic prejudice contact theory cultural framing quantitative methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) within the framework of the Mosaic Programme (Grant Number 017.006.085). The authors wish to thank the Members of LOBOCOP – a discussion group for cultural sociologists at the Erasmus University, Rotterdam – for their valuable comments and suggestions. The authors are indebted to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aberson, C.L., Shoemaker, C. and Tomolillo, C. (2004) Implicit bias and contact: The role of interethnic friendships. The Journal of Social Psychology 144(3): 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. and Smith, P. (2003) The strong program in cultural sociology: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In: J. Alexander (ed.) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G.W. (1979) [1954] The Nature of Prejudice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Altemeyer, R. (1998) The other ‘Authoritarian Personality’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30: 47–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bail, C.A. (2008) The configuration of symbolic boundaries against immigrants in Europe. American Sociological Review 73(1): 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow, F.K., et al. (2012) The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(12): 1629–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs, M. and Knauss, S. (2012) Explaining membership in the British National Party: A multilevel analysis of contact and threat. European Sociological Review 28(5): 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendy, A., Demoulin, S. and Leyens, J. (2009) Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(4): 843–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, M.B. and Campbell, D.T. (1976) Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Attitudes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Coenders, M. (2001) Nationalistic attitudes and ethnic exclusionism in a comparative perspective: An empirical study of attitudes toward the country and ethnic immigrants in 22 countries. Dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  11. De Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (1995) Culturele en economische beroepsstatus: Een evaluatie van subjectieve en objectieve benaderingen. Mens en Maatschappij 70: 152–165.Google Scholar
  12. De Graaf, P.M. and Kalmijn, M. (2001) Trends in the intergenerational transmission of cultural and economic status. Acta Sociologica 44(1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Koster, W., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D. and Van der Waal, J. (2010) Van God los: Post-Christelijk cultureel conflict in Nederland. Sociologie 6(3): 27–49.Google Scholar
  14. De Souza Briggs, X. (2007) ‘Some of My Best Friends Are…’: Interracial friendships, class, and segregation in America. City and Community 6(4): 263–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhont, K. and Van Hiel, A. (2009) We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences 46: 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixon, J.C. (2006) The ties that bind and those that don’t: Toward reconciling group threat and contact theories of prejudice. Social Forces 84(4): 2179–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dixon, J.C. and Rosenbaum, M.S. (2004) Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-Black and anti-Hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly 85(2): 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Douglas, M. (1978) Cultural Bias. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Duyvendak, J.W. (2004) De individualisering van de samenleving en de toekomst van de sociologie. Sociologische Gids 51(1): 495–506.Google Scholar
  20. Eller, A. and Abrams, D. (2003) ‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6(1): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eller, A. and Abrams, D. (2004) Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology 34(3): 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Emler, N. and Frazer, E. (1999) Politics: The education effect. Oxford Review of Education 25(1–2): 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Escandell, X. and Ceobanu, A.M. (2009) When contact with immigrants matters: Threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain’s Comunidades Autónomas. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32(1): 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gabennesch, H. (1972) Authoritarianism as world view. American Journal of Sociology 77: 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gitlin, T. (1980) The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  27. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagendoorn, L. (1995) Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology 6: 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hainmueller, J. and Hopkins, D.J. (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J. and Norenzayan, A. (2010) The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: 61–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hewstone, M. (2015) Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues 71(2): 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodson, G. (2008) Interracial prison contact: The pros for (social dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology 47: 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodson, G., Harry, H. and Mitchell, A. (2009) Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology 39(4): 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Houtman, D. (2003) Class and Politics in Contemporary Social Science: ‘Marxism Lite’ and Its Blind Spot for Culture. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Houtman, D. and Achterberg, P. (2016) Quantitative analysis in cultural sociology: Why it should be done, how it can be done. In: D. Inglis and A. Almila (eds.) Sage Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London: Sage, pp. 225–236.Google Scholar
  36. Houtman, D., Aupers, S. and De Koster, W. (2011) Paradoxes of Individualization: Social Control and Social Conflict in Contemporary Modernity. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  37. Husnu, S. and Crisp, R.J. (2010) Elaboration enhances imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46: 943–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackman, M.R. and Crane, M. (1986) ‘Some of My Best Friends Are Black…’: Interracial friendship and White’s racial attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 50(4): 459–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jowell, R. and the Central Coordinating Team, European Social Survey (2002/2003) Technical Report. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University.Google Scholar
  40. Kalmijn, M. (1991) Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 496–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalmijn, M. (1994) Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology 100(2): 422–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalmijn, M. (1998) Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kinder, D.R. and Kam, C.D. (2009) US Against Them. Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kouvo, A. and Lockmer, C. (2013) Imagine all the neighbours: Perceived neighbourhood ethnicity, interethnic friendship ties and perceived ethnic threat in four Nordic countries. Urban Studies 50(16): 3305–3322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kunovich, R.M. (2004) Social structural position and prejudice: An exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Social Science Research 33(1): 20–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laurence, J. (2014) Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: Does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations? Ethnic and Racial Studies 37(8): 1328–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin, S., Van Laar, C. and Sidanius, J. (2003) The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendship on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6: 76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marsden, P.V. (1988) Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks 10(1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martinovic, B., Van Tubergen, F. and Maas, I. (2009) Dynamics of interethnic contact: A panel study of immigrants in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review 25(3): 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLaren, L.M. (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces 81(3): 909–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meuleman, B. (2009) The Influence of Macro-sociological Factors on Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. A Cross-Cultural and Contextual Approach. Dissertation, University of Leuven, Leuven.Google Scholar
  52. Norris, P. and Inglehart, R. (2004) Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E. and Voci, A. (2004) Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reducing mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 770–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petermann, S. and Schönwälder, K. (2012) Gefährdet Multikulturalität tatsächlich Vertrauen und Solidarität? Eine Replik. Leviathan 40(4): 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pettigrew, T.F. (1997) Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23: 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pettigrew, T.F. (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.T. (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.R. (2008) How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology 38: 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.R. (2011) When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R., Wagner, U. and Christ, O. (2011) Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35: 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Powers, D.A. and Ellison, C.G. (1995) Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces 74: 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Putnam, R.D. (2007) E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Quillian, L. (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60(4): 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Savelkoul, M., Scheepers, P., Tolsma, J. and Hagendoorn, L. (2011) Anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands: Test of contradictory hypotheses derived from ethnic competition theory and contact theory. European Sociological Review 27(6): 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schalk-Soekar, S.R.G., Vijver, F.J.R. and Van de Hoogsteder, M. (2004) Attitudes toward multiculturalism of immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 28(6): 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M. and Coenders, M. (2002) Ethnic exclusionism in European countries. Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 18(1): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmid, K., Al Ramiah, A. and Hewstone, M. (2014) Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science 25(3): 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schneider, S. (2008) Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review 24(1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sears, D.O. (1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Semyonov, M. and Glikman A. (2009) Ethnic residential segregation, social contacts, and anti-minority attitudes in European societies. European Sociological Review 25(6): 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sidanius, J., Van Laar, C., Levin, S. and Sinclair, S. (2004) Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(1): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C. and Sears, D.O. (2008) The Diversity Challenge: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations on the College Campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  73. Sigelman, L. and Welch, S. (1993) The contact hypothesis revisited: Black–White interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces 71(3): 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stolle, D., Soroka, S. and Johnston, R. (2008) When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies 56: 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stolle, D., Petermann, S., Schmid, K., Schönwälder, K., Hewstone, M., Vertovec, S., Schmitt, T. and Heywood, J. (2013) Immigration-related diversity and trust in German cities: The role of intergroup contact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23(3): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stubager, R. (2008) Education effects on authoritarian–libertarian values: A question of socialization. British Journal of Sociology 59(2): 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stubager, R. (2009) Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian–libertarian value conflict. European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 204–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson, M., Ellis, R. and Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  79. Vaisey, S. and Lizardo, O. (2010) Can cultural worldviews influence network composition? Social Forces 88(4): 1595–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Van der Waal, J. and Houtman, D. (2011) Tolerance in the postindustrial city: Assessing the ethnocentrism of less-educated natives in 22 Dutch cities. Urban Affairs Review 47(5): 642–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T.F., Christ, O., Wolf, C., Petzel, T., Castro, V. and Jackson, J.S. (2004) The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Laar, C., Levin, S., Sinclair, S. and Sidanius, J. (2005) The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 41: 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Laar, C., Levin, S. and Sidanius, J. (2008) Ingroup and outgroup contact: A longitudinal study of the effects of cross-ethnic friendships, dates, roommate relationships and participation in segregated organizations. In: U. Wagner, L.R. Tropp, G. Finchilescu and C. Tredoux (eds.) Improving Intergroup Relations: Building on the Legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
  84. Vasta, E. (2007) From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Multiculturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(5): 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wagner, U., Van Dick, R., Pettigrew, T.F. and Christ, O. (2003) Ethnic prejudice in East and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6(1): 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Welch, S. and Sigelman, L. (2000) Getting to know you? Latino-Anglo social contact. Social Science Quarterly 81(1): 67–83.Google Scholar
  87. Wilson, T.C. (1996) Prejudice reduction or self-selection? A test of the contact hypothesis. Sociological Spectrum 16(1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katerina Manevska
    • 1
  • Peter Achterberg
    • 2
  • Dick Houtman
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Management ResearchRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral SciencesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Center for Sociological ResearchUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations