Advertisement

Improving housing and neighborhoods for the vulnerable: older people, small households, urban design, and planning

  • Ann ForsythEmail author
  • Jennifer Molinsky
  • Har Ye Kan
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The number of older people who need help with daily tasks will increase during the next century. Currently preferences and policies aim to help older people to stay in their existing homes, to age in place, even as they become less able to care for themselves and, increasingly, live alone. However, the majority of homes in the U.S. and many other countries are not designed to support advanced old age or are not located to easily provide support and services. The paper explores the needs of older people experiencing frailty. It examines the existing range of innovations to make neighbourhoods and homes more supportive, physically, socially, and in terms of services. These include: enriching neighbourhoods, providing collective services, building all-age neighbourhoods, creating purpose-built supportive housing, developing smallscale intergenerational models, and engaging mobility, delivery, and communications innovations. Some will allow people to remain in their current dwelling but others focus on people remaining in a local community. Few are widely available at present. Urban designers can more fully engage with the multiple challenges of those who have physical, sensory, and cognitive impairments and living in solo households by becoming champions for a more comprehensive set of public realm improvements and linkages.

Keywords

Older people Frail Housing Neighbourhood Health Single 

Notes

References

  1. Abbeyfield. 2018. Abbeyfield web site/. https://www.abbeyfield.com/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  2. Age-Friendly NYC. 2017. New Commitments for a City for All Ages. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dfta/downloads/pdf/age_friendly/AgeFriendlyNYC2017.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  3. Alidoust, S., C. Bosman, G. Holden, H. Shearer, and L. Shutter. 2017. The spatial dimensions of neighbourhood: how older people define it. Journal of Urban Design 22 (5): 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltes, P.B., and M.M. Baltes. 1990. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences, ed. P.B. Baltes and M.M. Baltes, 1–34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandeen-Roche, K., C.L. Seplaki, J. Huang, B. Buta, R.R. Kalyani, R. Varadhan, Q.-L. Xue, J.D. Walson, and J.D. Kasper. 2015. Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences 70 (11): 1427–1434.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, P., and S. Twitchin. 2006. The living environments of community-dwelling older people who become frail: another look at the living standards of Older New Zealanders Survey. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 28: 133–157.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, F. and M. Miller. N.d. Life tables for the United States Social Security Areas 1900–2100. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/as116/as116_V.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  8. Billig, M. 2004. Supportive communities: an optimal arrangement for the older population? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 31 (3): 131–151.Google Scholar
  9. Birkbeck, D. 2014. Happy Meals: Finding happiness with Hans Becker and the Humanitas care model. Architectural Design 84 (2): 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckinx, F., Y. Rolland, J.-Y. Reginster, C. Ricour, J. Petermans, and O. Bruyère. 2015. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Archives of Public Health 73: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byles, J.E., L. Mackenzie, S. Redman, L. Parkinson, L. Leigh, and C. Curryer. 2014. Supporting housing and neighbourhoods for healthy ageing: findings form the Housing and Independent Living Study (HAIL). Australasian Journal on Ageing 33 (1): 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capital Impact Partners. 2015. Sustaining the Village Movement: Lessons from Pioneers about Village Business Models and Sustainability. https://www.capitalimpact.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2015-Sustaining-The-Village-Movement.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  13. Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chernew, M., D.M. Cutler, K. Ghosh, and M.B. Landrum. 2016. Understanding the Improvements in Disability Free Life Expectancy in the U.S. Elderly Population. NBER Working Papers. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cutler/files/w22306.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  15. Clark, P., and E.R. Nieuwenhuijsen. 2009. Environments for healthy ageing: A critical review. Maturitas 64: 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clegg, A., J. Young, S. Iliffe, M.O. Rikkert, and K. Rockwood. 2013. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381: 752–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. deLaGrange, K. 2014. Elder cohousing—How viable is cohousing for an aging population? http://www.cohousing.org/elder-cohousing. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  18. Diaz Moore, K. 2014. An ecological framework of place: Situating environmental gerontology within a life course perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 79 (3): 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duff, S. 2012. The possibilities in neighbourhoods—Utilizing accessory apartments in existing homes to address social, environmental, and economic issues. Urban Design International 17 (1): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durrett, Charles. 2009. Senior Cohousing: A Community Approach to Independent Living—The Handbook, 2nd ed. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Press.Google Scholar
  21. Forsyth, A. 1992. Changing Places: Case Studies of Innovations in Housing for Older People. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  22. Forsyth, A. 2014. Global suburbia and the transition century: Physical suburbs in the long term. Urban Design International 19 (4): 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forsyth, A., E. Salomon, and L. Smead. 2017. Creating Healthy Neighborhoods: Evidence-based Planning and Design Strategies. Chicago: APA Planners Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fried, L.P. 2016. Interventions for human frailty: physical activity as a model. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 6: a025916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frye, A. 2014. Growing old in the city. Journal of Urban Design 19 (3): 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gobtop, S.M., and J.A. Memken. 2005. Housing the elderly: investigating solutions to help seniors age in place. Housing and Society 32 (1): 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenfield, E.A. 2016. Support from neighbors and aging in place: can NORC programs make a difference. The Gerontologist 56 (4): 651–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenfield, E.A., A.E. Scharlach, A.J, Lehning, J.K. Davitt, and C.L. Graham. 2013. A tale of two community initiatives for promoting aging in place: similarities and differences in the national implementation of NORC programs and Villages. The Gerontologist 53 (6): 928–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hackney. 2016. Holly Street Estate. https://www.hackney.gov.uk/holly-street-estate. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  30. Hanson, J. 2001. From ‘special needs’ to ‘lifestyle choices’: articulating the demand for ‘third age’ housing. In Inclusive Housing in an Ageing Society: Innovative Approaches, ed. S.M. Peace and C. Holland. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  31. Harttgen, K., P. Kowal, H. Strulik, S. Chatterji, and S. Vollmer. 2013. Patterns of frailty in older adults: comparing results from higher and lower income countries using the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE). PLoS ONE 8 (10): e75847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. He, W., D. Goodkind, and P. Kowal. 2016. An Aging World (2015) International Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census.Google Scholar
  33. Hunter, R.H., K. Sydkes, S.G. Lowman, R. Duncan, W. Satariano, and B. Belza. 2011. Environmental and policy change to support healthy aging. Journal of Aging and Social Policy 23 (4): 354–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Institute for Human Centered Design. 2018. Principles. https://humancentereddesign.org/inclusive-design/principles. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  35. Ivery, J.M., D. Akstein-Kahan, and K.C. Murphy. 2010. NORC Supportive Services model implementation and community capacity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 53 (1): 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jenkens, R.T., N. Sult, D. Lessell, and A.Ortigara Hammer. 2011. Financial implications of the green house model. Seniors Housing and Care Journal 19 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, A., C. Tilse, H. Bartlett, and R. Stimson. 2008. Integrated Support and Care for People in Later Life. Positioning Paper No. 108. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Judd, B., D. Olsberg, J. Quinn, L, Groenhart, and O. Demirbilek. 2010. Dwelling, Land and Neighborhood Use by Older Homeowners. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Report no 144. Melbourne: AHURI.Google Scholar
  39. Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. 2016. Projections and Implications of Housing an Aging Population: Older Households 2015–2035. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies.Google Scholar
  40. Kasper, J.D., V.A. Freedman, B.C. Spillman, and J.L. Wolff. 2015. The Disproportionate impact of dementia on family and unpaid caregiving to older adults. Health Affairs 34 (10): 1642–1649B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krieger, A. 2006. Where and how does urban design happen? Harvard Design Magazine 24: 64–71.Google Scholar
  42. Lafortune, G., G. Balestat, and the Disability Study Expert Group Members. 2007. Trends in Severe Disability among Elderly People: Assessing the Evidence in 12 OECD Countries and the Future Implications. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  43. Lang, J. 2005. Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lawler, K. 2001. Aging in Place: Coordinating Housing and Health Care Provision for America’s Growing Elderly Population. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University. http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/jchs.harvard.edu/files/lawler_w01-13.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  45. Lawton, M., and L. Nahemow. 1973. Ecology and the aging process. In The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, ed. C. Eisdorfer and M. Lawton, 619–674. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lawton, M. 1980. Environment and Aging. Albany, NY: Center for the Study of Aging.Google Scholar
  47. Lawton, M. 1982. Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In Aging and the Environment, eds. M. Lawton, P. Windley, and T. Byerts, 33–59. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Lien, L.L., C.D. Steggell, and S. Iwarsson. 2015. Adaptive strategies and person-environment fit among functionally limited older adults aging in place: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (9): 11954–11974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mackett, R.L., K. Achuthan, and H. Titheridge. 2008. AMELIA: Making streets more accessible for people with mobility difficulties. Urban Design International 13: 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Masotti, P.J., R. Frick, A. Johnson-Masotti, and S. Macleod. 2006. Naturally occurring retirement communities: a low-cost approach to facilitating healthy aging. American Journal of Public Health 96 (7): 1164–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McDonough, K.E., and J.K. Davitt. 2011. It takes a village: Community practice, social work, and aging in place. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 54: 528–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mitchell, L., E. Burton, and S. Raman. 2004. Dementia-friendly cities: designing intelligible neighbourhoods for life. Journal of Urban Design 9 (1): 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. New York Academy of Medicine. N.d. Age-friendly NYC. http://nyam.org/age-friendly-nyc/our-work/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  54. New York State Office for the Aging. N.d. Naturally Occurring Retirement Community Supportive Service Program (NORC-SSP) and Neighborhood NORC (NNORC) https://aging.ny.gov/NYSOFA/Programs/CommunityBased/NORC-NNORC.cfm. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  55. NIA and WHO. 2011. Global Health and Aging. Washington DC: NIA.Google Scholar
  56. OECD. 2015. SF2.5 Childlessness. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_2-5-Childlessness.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  57. Park, S., B. Kim, and J. Cho. 2017. Formal volunteering among vulnerable older adults from an environmental perspective: Does senior housing matter. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 31 (4): 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plouffe, L., and A. Kalache. 2010. Towards global age-friendly cities: determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health 87 (5): 733–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prioux, F., M. Mazuy, and M. Barbieri. 2010. Recent demographic developments in France: Fewer adults live with a partner. Population-E 65 (3): 363–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rowe, J.W. and R.L. Kahn. 1998. Successful Aging. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  61. Rowe, P., A. Forsyth, and H.Y. Kan. 2016. China’s Urban Communities: Concepts, Contexts, and Well-being. Berlin: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  62. Roy, N., R. Dube, C. Despres, A. Freitas, and F. Legare. 2018. Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PLoS ONE 13 (1): e0189266.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189266. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. RTI International and Leadingage. 2016. Support and Services at Home (SASH) Evaluation: Second Annual Report. https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/support-and-services-home-sash-evaluation-second-annual-report. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  64. Straits Times. 2017. Singapore’s first ‘retirement kampung’ stirs to life as residents move in. October 16: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/housing/kampung-admiralty-stirs-to-life-as-residents-move-in. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  65. Sharkey, S., S. Hudak, S.D. Horn, B. James, M. Stat, and J. Howes. 2011. Frontline caregiver daily practices: a comparison study of traditional nursing homes and the Green House project sites. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 59: 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. U.S. National Cancer Institute. N.d. NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  67. Wahl, H.W., S. Iwarsson, and F. Oswald. 2012. Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future. The Gerontologist 52 (3): 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, W., and K. Parker. 2014. Record Share of Americans Have Never Married: As Values, Economics and Gender Patterns Change. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  69. Wardrip, K. 2010. Cohousing for Older Adults. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  70. West, L.A., S. Cole, D. Goodkind, and W. He. (2014) 65 + in the United States: (2010). Current Population reports. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  71. World Health Organization n.d. Life Expectancy. http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/situation_trends_text/en/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  72. World Health Organization. 2002. Active ageing: A policy framework. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67215/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  73. World Health Organization. 2007. Checklist of Essential Features of Age-Friendly Cities. WHO Resource, http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Age_friendly_cities_checklist.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban Planning and DesignHarvard GSDCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Joint Center for Housing StudiesCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.International Studies ProgramHope CollegeHollandUSA

Personalised recommendations