Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Form Syntax” as a contribution to geodesign: A morphological tool for urbanity-making in urban design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creating vibrant urban places is a challenging task in urban design due to the intangible feature of urbanity. This paper presents Form Syntax, a design analytical tool that is capable of assisting urbanity making in design practices based on understandings of three essential urban morphological elements and their influences on urbanity. Using the geographical information system (GIS), Form Syntax integrates three methods—Space Syntax, Spacematrix, and Mixed-Use Index—to measure the street-network configuration, building density, and functional mix, respectively. These three components can be quantified and combined to represent urban morphological features, thereby providing a classification of the degree of urbanity. Form Syntax contributes to geodesign by combining quantitative tools with traditional, intuition-based design to achieve a clear visualisation of the degree of urbanity of a place, which can subsequently be used to propose spatial strategies for enhancing vibrant urban places. The Dutch city of Rotterdam is used to illustrate how the tool improves the traditional site analysis, idea evaluation, and proposal evaluation phases of urban design. A GIS add-in has been developed to enhance the appeal of Form Syntax among urban design practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batty, M. (2007) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2013) Defining geodesign (=GIS + design?). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 40(1): 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirão, J., Duarte, J., Stouffs, R. and Bekkering, H. (2012) Designing with urban induction patterns: a methodological approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39(4): 665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghauser-Pont, M. and Haupt, P. (2007) The relationship between urban form and density. Urban Morphology 11(1): 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghauser-Pont, M. and Haupt, P. (2010) Spacematrix: Space, Density and Urban Form. Amsterdam: NAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, P. (1988) What city? A plea for place in the public realm. The Architectural Review 184(1101): 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremaschi, M. and Eckhardt, F. (2011) Changing Places: Urbanity, Citizenship, and Ideology in the New European Neighbourhoods. Amsterdam: Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conzen, M.P. (2010) The elusive common denominator in understanding urban form Urban Morphology 14(1): 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conzen, M.R.G. (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-Plan Analysis, Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers). Wiley on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society.

  • Cowan, R. and Rogers, L. (2005) The Dictionary of Urbanism. Salisbury: Tisbury Streetwise Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangermond, J. (2013) Keynote. 2013 Geodesign Summit. Redlands, CA: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1990) Green Paper on the Urban Environment. Brussels: EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman, M. (2010) Geodesign: Fundamental Principles and Routes Forward. Redlands, CA: GeoDesign Summit ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. (1989, originally published in 1971) Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Goodman, A. and Kruskal, H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49(268): 732–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1999) Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International 4(3–4): 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. and Xu, J. (1993) Natural Movement: or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(1): 29–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten, V. and van Nes, A. (2005) How block types influences the natural movement economic process: Micro-spatial conditions on the dispersal of shops and Café in Berlin. In: van Nes, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, The Netherlands: Techne Press, p. 225.

  • Karimi, K. (2012) A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’s methodology. Urban Design International 17(4): 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. (2005) Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. Amsterdam: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkham, P.J. and Jones, A.N. (1991) A Glossary of Urban Form. London: Institute of British Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. (2010) Planning urbanity? Environment and Planning A 42(10): 2302–2308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. and Seo, H. B. (2015) Developing visibility analysis for a retail store: A pilot study in a bookstore. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42(1): 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, L. (2010) Spatial capital. The Journal of Space Syntax 1(1): 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. and Caliskan, O. (2011) A joint framework for urban morphology and design. Built Environment 37(4): 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1998) Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design 3(1): 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A.V. (1997) Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology 1(1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moughtin, C., Cuesta, R., Sarris, C. and Signoretta, P. (1999) Urban Design: Method and Technique. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E.P. (2009) Defining Urban Design: CIAM Architects and the Formation of a Discipline, 1937–1969. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, V. (2013) Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form. Urban Morphology 17(1): 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanilov, K. (2010) Bridging the gap between urban morphology and urban modelling. Urban Morphology 14(2): 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz, C. (2012) A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography By Design. California: Esri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trancik, R. (1986) Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoek, J. (2009) The mixed use index (Mixed-use Index) as planning tool for (new) towns in the 21st century. In: M. Provoost (ed.) New Towns for the 21st Century: the Planned vs, the Unplanned city. Amsterdam: SUN Architecture, pp. 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nes, A. (2002) Road building and urban change. The effect of rind roads on the dispersal of shop and retail in Western European towns and cities. PhD thesis. Department of Land Use and Landscape Planning. Agricultural University of Norway.

  • van Nes, A. and López, M. (2010) Macro and micro scale spatial variables and the distribution of residential burglaries and theft from cars: an investigation of space and crime in the Dutch cities of Alkmaar and Gouda. Journal of Space Syntax 1(2): 296–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nes, A. and Stolk, E H. (2012) Degrees of sustainable location of railway stations: Integrating space syntax and Node place value model on railway stations in the province Noord-Holland’s strategic plan for 2010–2040. In: M. Greene, J. Reyes, and A. Castro (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile: PUC, p. 8005.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaick, J. and van Der Spek, S.C. (2008) Urbanism on Track: Application of Tracking Technologies in Urbanism. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, S. (2011) The life and form of the city: An interview with Bill Hillier. Space and Culture 14(2): 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y. and van Nes, A. (2013) Measuring urban maturation processes in Dutch and Chinese new towns: Combining street network configuration with building density and degree of land use diversification through GIS. Journal of Space Syntax 4(1): 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y. and van Nes, A. (2014) Quantitative tools in urban morphology: combining space syntax, Spacematrix, and Mixed-use Index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphology 18(2): 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Henrik Harder, Anders Sorgenfri Jensen, Kristian and Hegner Reinau for the GPS data and insightful suggestions they provided. We are also grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Yu Ye & Yu Zhuang

  2. Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Anthony Yeh & Jianzheng Liu

  3. Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL, Delft, The Netherlands

    Akkelies van Nes

Authors
  1. Yu Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony Yeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akkelies van Nes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianzheng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Ye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Y., Yeh, A., Zhuang, Y. et al. “Form Syntax” as a contribution to geodesign: A morphological tool for urbanity-making in urban design. Urban Des Int 22, 73–90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0035-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0035-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation