Advertisement

Digital agendas in the insurance industry: the importance of comprehensive approaches

  • Alexander Bohnert
  • Albrecht Fritzsche
  • Shirley Gregor
Article

Abstract

With a growing awareness of the potential of innovation provided by digital technology, insurance companies have increasingly adopted digital agendas in their business activities. Our paper studies the relationship between the expression of a digital agenda in annual reports and the business performance of 41 publicly-traded European insurance companies for the time period from 2007 to 2017. Our findings show a positive relationship, which is particularly strong in cases where companies take a comprehensive approach by addressing digital technology both in the context of internal activities within their own organisation and external activities in connection with customers and business partners.

Keywords

Digitalization Firm characteristics Shareholder value Corpus linguistics 

References

  1. ACORD (Association for Cooperative Operations Research and Development). 2017. Insurance Digital Maturity Study.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, R., and H.C. Lucas Jr. 2005. The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on High-Visibility and High-Impact Research. MIS Quarterly 29 (3): 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, R., G. Gao, C. DesRoches, and A.K. Jha. 2010. Research Commentary: The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead. Information Systems Research 21 (4): 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atzori, L., A. Iera, and G. Morabito. 2010. The Internet of Things: A Survey. Computer Networks 54 (15): 2787–2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardhan, I., V. Krishnan, and S. Lin. 2013. Research Note—Business Value of Information Technology: Testing the Interaction Effect of IT and R&D on Tobin’s Q. Information Systems Research 24 (4): 1147–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkur, G., K.V.M. Varambally, and L.R. Rodrigues. 2007. Insurance Sector Dynamics: Towards Transformation into Learning Organization. The Learning Organization 14 (6): 510–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beltratti, A., and G. Corvino. 2008. Why are Insurance Companies Different? The Limits of Convergence among Financial Institutions. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 33 (3): 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohnert, A., N. Gatzert, R.E. Hoyt, and P. Lechner. 2018. The Drivers and Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from ERM Ratings. European Journal of Finance.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1514314.
  9. Bouchet-Valat, M. 2014. SnowballC: Snowball Stemmers Based on the C libstemmer UTF-8 Library.Google Scholar
  10. Boudreau, M.C., and D. Robey. 2005. Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science 16 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brettel, M., N. Friederichsen, M. Keller, and M. Rosenberg. 2014. How Virtualization, Decentralization and Network Building Change the Manufacturing Landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering 8 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., and A. McAfee. 2012. Winning the Race with Ever-Smarter Machines. Management Review 53 (2): 53–60.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, S. 2015. Overcoming Barriers to Microinsurance Adoption: Evidence from the Field. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 40 (4): 720–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desyllas, P., and M. Sako. 2013. Profiting from Business Model Innovation: Evidence from Pay-As-You-Drive Auto Insurance. Research Policy 42 (1): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dhar, V., and A. Sundararajan. 2007. Issues and Opinions: Information Technologies in Business: A Blueprint for Education and Research. Information Systems Research 18 (2): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumm, R.E., and R.E. Hoyt. 2003. Insurance Distribution Channels: Markets in Transition. Journal of Insurance Regulation 22 (1): 27–47.Google Scholar
  17. Eastman, J.K., A.D. Eastman, and K.L. Eastman. 2002. Insurance Sales Agents and the Internet: The Relationship Between Opinion Leadership, Subjective Knowledge, and Internet Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Management 18 (3–4): 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eling, M., and M. Lehmann. 2018. The Impact of Digitalization on the Insurance Value Chain and the Insurability of Risks. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 43 (3): 359–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eling, M., and W. Schnell. 2016. What Do We Know about Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance? The Journal of Risk Finance 17 (5): 474–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fichman, R.G., B.L. Dos Santos, and Z. Zheng. 2014. Digital Innovation as a Fundamental and Powerful Concept in the Information Systems Curriculum. MIS Quarterly 38 (2): 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garven, J.R. 2002. On the Implication of the Internet for Insurance Markets and Institutions. Risk Management and Insurance Review 5 (2): 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gehrke, E. 2014. The Insurability Framework Applied to Agricultural Microinsurance: What Do We Know, What Can We Learn? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 39 (2): 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gölzer, P., and A. Fritzsche. 2017. Data-driven Operations Management: Organisational Implications of the Digital Transformation in Industrial Practice. Production Planning & Control 28 (16): 1332–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greene, W.H. 2012. Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  25. Gries, S.T., and J. Newman. 2013. Creating and Using Corpora. In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. R.J. Podesva and D. Sharma, 257–287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Guo, S., and M.W. Fraser. 2010. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Heckman, J.J. 1978. Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System. Econometrica 46 (4): 931–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckman, J.J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hess, T., C. Matt, A. Benlian, and F. Wiesböck. 2016. Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive 15 (2): 123–139.Google Scholar
  30. Hildebrandt, B., A. Hanelt, S. Firk, and L. M. Kolbe. 2015. Entering the Digital Era—The Impact of Digital Technology-related M&As on Business Model Innovations of Automobile OEMs, 36th International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  31. Hoyt, R.E., and A.P. Liebenberg. 2011. The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance 78 (4): 795–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hylving, L. and U. Schultze. 2013. Evolving the Modular Layered Architecture in Digital Innovation: The Case of the Car’s Instrument Cluster, 34th International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  33. Imbens, G.W., and J.M. Wooldridge. 2009. Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47 (1): 5–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Insurance Europe. 2016 European Insurance—Key Facts, www.insuranceeurope.eu. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  35. Kaiser, T. 2002. The Customer Shall Lead: E-Business Solutions for the New Insurance Industry. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 27 (1): 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kohli, R., and S. Devaraj. 2003. Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research. Information Systems Research 14 (2): 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohli, R., and V. Grover. 2008. Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, E.A. 2008. Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), pp. 363–369.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, L.-F. 1978. Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables. International Economic Review 19 (2): 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Legner, C., T. Eymann, T. Hess, C. Matt, T. Böhmann, P. Drews, A. Mädche, N. Urbach, and F. Ahlemann. 2017. Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59 (4): 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leonardi, P.M. 2011. When Flexible Routines meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies. MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lin, Y., M.-M. Wen, and J. Yu. 2012. Enterprise Risk Management: Strategic Antecedents, Risk Integration, and Performance. North American Actuarial Journal 16 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindenberg, E.B., and S.A. Ross. 1981. Tobin’s Q Ratio and Industrial Organization. The Journal of Business 54 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu, Y., and K.R. Ramamurthy. 2011. Understanding the Link between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination. MIS Quarterly 35 (4): 931–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas, H.C., R. Agarwal, E.K. Clemons, O.A. El Sawy, and B. Weber. 2013. Impactful Research on Transformational Information Technology: An Opportunity to Inform New Audiences. MIS Quarterly 37 (2): 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lusch, R.F., and S. Nambisan. 2015. Service Innovation: A Service-dominant Logic Perspective. MIS Quarterly 39 (1): 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Markus, M.L., and D. Robey. 1988. Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research. Management Science 34 (5): 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markus, M.L. 2004. Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change. Journal of Information Technology 19 (1): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Masli, A., V.J. Richardson, J.M. Sanchez, and R.E. Smith. 2011. The Business Value of IT: A Synthesis and Framework of Archival Research. Journal of Information Systems 25 (2): 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Matt, C., T. Hess, and A. Benlian. 2015. Digital Transformation Strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering 57 (5): 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McAfee, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2012. Big Data: The Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review 90: 3–9.Google Scholar
  53. Melville, N., K. Kraemer, and V. Gurbaxani. 2004. Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value. MIS Quarterly 28 (2): 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mertens, P., and M. Wiener. 2018. Riding the Digitalization Wave: Toward a Sustainable Nomenclature in Wirtschaftsinformatik. Business & Information Systems Engineering 60 (4): 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyer, S., and G. Krohm. 1999. An Overview of Regulatory Developments of Insurance Transactions on the Internet. Journal of Insurance Regulation 17 (4): 551–554.Google Scholar
  56. Mithas, S., N. Ramasubbu, and V. Sambamurthy. 2011. How Information Management Capability Influences Firm Performance. MIS Quarterly 35 (1): 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mithas, S., A. Tafti, I. Bardhan, and J.M. Goh. 2012. Information Technology and Firm Profitability: Mechanisms and Empirical Evidence. MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 205–224.Google Scholar
  58. Nambisan, S., K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, and M. Song. 2017. Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly 41 (1): 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nicoletti, B. 2016. Digital Insurance: Business Innovation in the Post-Crisis Era. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orlikowski, W.J. 2009. The Sociomateriality of Organisational Life: Considering Technology in Management Research. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pentland, B.T., M.S. Feldman, M.C. Becker, and P. Liu. 2012. Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model. Journal of Management Studies 49 (8): 1484–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Porter, M.E., and J.E. Heppelmann. 2014. How Smart Connected Products Are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review 92: 3–23.Google Scholar
  63. Riedl, R., A. Benlian, T. Hess, D. Stelzer, and H. Sikora. 2017. On the Relationship between Information Management and Digitalization. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59 (6): 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sambamurthy, V., A. Bharadwaj, and V. Grover. 2003. Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms. MIS Quarterly 27 (2): 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salman, S.A. 2014. Contemporary Issues in Takaful (Islamic Insurance). Asian Social Science 10 (22): 210–216.Google Scholar
  66. Saunders, A., and E. Brynjolfsson. 2016. Valuing Information Technology Related Intangible Assets. MIS Quarterly 40 (1): 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schmidt, R., M. Möhring, F. Bär, and A. Zimmermann. 2017. The Impact of Digitization on Information System Design—An Explorative Case Study of Digitization in the Insurance Business, Business Information Systems Workshops, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
  68. Schryen, G. 2013. Revisiting IS Business Value Research: What We Already Know, What We Still Need to Know, and How We Can Get There. European Journal of Information Systems 22 (2): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schulte-Noelle, H. 2001. Technological Changes in IT and Their Influence on Insurance: The Change Ahead (I). The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 26 (1): 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Seitz, M. 2017. Online Insurance Management among German Farmers, The Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference Central and Eastern Europe in the Changing Business Environment, pp. 212–220.Google Scholar
  71. Seog, S.H. 2009. Insurance Markets with Differential Information. Journal of Risk and Insurance 76 (2): 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Skog, D.A., H. Wimelius, and J. Sandberg. 2018. Digital Disruption. Business & Information Systems Engineering 53: 1–7.Google Scholar
  73. Steininger, K., R. Riedl, F. Roithmayr, and P. Mertens. 2009. Fads and Trends in Business and Information Systems Engineering and Information Systems Research–A Comparative Literature Analysis. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1 (6): 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Svahn, F., O. Henfridsson, and Y. Yoo. 2009. A Threesome Dance of Agency: Mangling the Sociomateriality of Technological Regimes in Digital Innovation, Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  75. Taylor, M. 2001. Technological Changes in IT and Their Influence on Insurance: The Change Ahead (II). The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 26 (1): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, and F.D. Davis. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yoo, Y., O. Henfridsson, and K. Lyytinen. 2010. Research Commentary: The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21 (4): 724–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Geneva Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Bohnert
    • 1
  • Albrecht Fritzsche
    • 1
  • Shirley Gregor
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)NurembergGermany
  2. 2.Australian National University (ANU) College of Business and EconomicsCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations