Coping with Shocks: Impact of Insurance Payouts on Small-Scale Farmers

  • Stephan DietrichEmail author


Weather insurance is regarded as a powerful tool to protect small-scale farmers from the economic impacts of natural disasters. In cases in which insured farmers suffer a loss, insurance payouts mitigate the financial consequences that otherwise could have forced them to apply disruptive coping strategies. This paper analyses the effects of payouts of yield insurance in Colombia on small-scale tobacco farmers. Two questions are raised: were the payouts made consistently after shocks and how did the payouts affect the ex post coping strategies of the beneficiaries? The data indicate a significant overlap in household losses between insured farmers who did and those who did not receive payouts, even though the insurance indemnified the main risks of the main income sources. Exploring the overlap to match the farmers of the two groups, it is suggested that the beneficiaries were better equipped to protect their resources, including assets and savings, after shocks.


coping strategies insurance natural disasters risk management Colombia 



This article benefited greatly from suggestions by Marcela Ibanez and Stephan Klasen and comments received at the brown bag seminar of the chair for Social Policy and Education of the University of Stellenbosch, the Development Economics seminar of the University of Göttingen, the AEL conference in Munich (2013), and the 2nd International Microinsurance Workshop in Munich (2014).


  1. Akotey, J.O. and Adjasi, C. (2014) ‘The impact of microinsurance on household asset accumulation in ghana: An asset index approach’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 39(2): 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, J. (2013) The impact of insurance provision on households' production and financial decisions, MPRA Paper (46864), Munich Personal RePEc Archiv.Google Scholar
  3. Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S. (2008) ‘Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching’, Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1): 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, M.R., Little, P.D., Mogues, T. and Negatu, W. (2007) ‘Poverty traps and natural disasters in Ethiopia and Honduras’, World Development 35(5): 835–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, M.R. and Maluccio, J.A. (2003) ‘Social capital and coping with economic shocks: An analysis of stunting of South African children’, World Development 31(7): 1147–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiputwa, B., Spielman, D.J. and Qaim, M. (2015) ‘Food standards, certification, and poverty among coffee farmers in Uganda’, World Development 66: 400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, D.J. and Grenham, D. (2013) ‘Microinsurance and natural disasters: challenges and options’, Environmental Science & Policy 27: S89–S98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Datt, G. and Hoogeveen, H. (2003) ‘El niño or el peso? Crisis, poverty and income distribution in the Philippines’, World Development 31(7): 1103–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dercon, S., ed. (2004) Insurance Against Poverty, UK WIDER Studies in Development Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dercon, S., Hoddinott, J. and Woldehanna, T. (2005) ‘Shocks and consumption in 15 ethiopian villages, 1999-2004’, Journal of African Economies 14: 559–585.Google Scholar
  11. Dercon, S., Kirchberger, M., Gunning, J.W. and Platteau, J.P. (2008) Literature review on microinsurance, Microinsurance Paper No. 1, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  12. Dietrich, S. and Ibanez, M. (2015) Impact of weather insurance on small scale farmers: A natural experiment, Poverty, Equity and Growth Discussion Paper No. 165, Goettingen, Germany: Georg-August-Universität.Google Scholar
  13. Eling, M., Pradhan, S. and Schmit, J.T. (2014) ‘The determinants of microinsurance demand’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 39(2): 224–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IFPRI (1986) Crop Insurance for Agricultural Development: Issues and Experience, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Janzen, S.A. and Carter, M.R. (2013) After the drought: The impact of microinsurance on consumption smoothing and asset protection, NBER Working Paper No. 19702, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  17. Macours, K. (2013) ‘Volatility, agricultural risk, and household poverty: Micro-evidence from randomized control trials’, Agricultural Economics 44(s1): 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rodriguez-Oreggia, E., De La Fuente, A., De La Torre, R. and Moreno, H.A. (2013) ‘Natural disasters, human development and poverty at the municipal level in mexico’, The Journal of Development Studies 49(3): 442–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Samson, J., Berteaux, D., McGill, B.J. and Humphries, M.M. (2011) ‘Geographic disparities and moral hazards in the predicted impacts of climate change on human populations’, Global Ecology and Biogeography 20(4): 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skees, J., Hazell, P.B.R. and Miranda, M. (1999) New approaches to crop yield insurance in developing countries, EPTD Discussion Paper No. 55, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Skoufias, E. (2003) ‘Economic crises and natural disasters: Coping strategies and policy implications’, World Development 31(7): 1087–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. World Bank (2013) World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity—Managing Risk for Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Geneva Association 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maastricht Graduate School of GovernanceMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations