Skip to main content
Log in

Working in the Informal Sector in Togo: Choice or Constraint?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper aims to determine whether working in the informal sector in Togo is a choice or a constraint. Two instrumental variables models (probit and 2SLS) were used to estimate the probability of being satisfied with informal employment. The data used come from the Survey on Transition to Working Life (ETVA) in Togo carried out by the ILO in 2014. The results show that working in the informal sector in Togo is more a constraint than a deliberate choice. In addition, salaried jobs in the informal sector are undesirable, and non-salaried jobs in this sector are chosen. Furthermore, several factors determine the satisfaction of young Togolese in informal employment, notably the salary, the geographical location of the company and the socio-demographic characteristics of the worker. Apart from these classic factors, job security, job flexibility, salary consistency and personal development are factors that also increase the likelihood of being satisfied with one's job in Togo. Thus, any policy targeting the Togolese informal sector should take into account the heterogeneity of this sector for better organisation and formalisation in order to reduce the degree of job insecurity and, in turn, fight against indecent jobs and poverty among young Togolese.

Résumé

L’objectif de cet article est de savoir si travailler dans le secteur informel au Togo est un choix ou une contrainte ? Deux modèles à variables instrumentales (probit et DMCO) sont utilisés pour calculer la probabilité d’être satisfait de son emploi. Les données proviennent de l’Enquête sur la Transition vers la Vie Active (ETVA) au Togo réalisé par le BIT en 2014. Des résultats, il ressort que travailler dans le secteur informel au Togo est plus une contrainte qu’un choix délibéré. Il ressort également que les emplois salariés du secteur informel sont de seconde main alors que les emplois non-salariés de ce secteur sont choisis. Par ailleurs, plusieurs facteurs déterminent la satisfaction des jeunes togolais dans l’emploi informel notamment le salaire, la situation géographique de l’entreprise et les caractéristiques sociodémographiques du travailleur. En dehors de ces facteurs classiques, la sécurité de l’emploi, la flexibilité de l’emploi, la consistance du salaire et le développement personnel sont des facteurs qui accroissent également la probabilité d’être satisfait de son emploi au Togo. Ainsi toute politique visant le secteur informel togolais devrait tenir compte de l’hétérogénéité de ce secteur pour une meilleure organisation et formalisation afin de réduire le degré de précarité des emplois et par ricochet lutter contre les emplois indécents et la pauvreté des jeunes togolais.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Togo, the informal sector is defined as a set of unincorporated enterprises owned by households that produce at least some products for the market but have fewer than a specified number of employees and/or are not registered according to specific forms of national legislation; registration may refer, for example, to registration provided for by tax obligations or social security contributions or other administrative provisions. Like many other countries in the subregion, growth in Togo does not create significant formal employment. Dominant employment remains in the informal sector.

  2. According to the ILO (2019), the share of informal employment in total employment in Togo increased from 87% in 2000 to 92.8% in 2016, with a proportion of 90.3% for men and 95.2% for women. The informal sector contributed 35.9% to GDP in 2015.

  3. Private sector employment is not taken into account here because young people employed in the private sector represent only a small proportion (less than 2%).

  4. The capital, Lomé, has more infrastructure than the interior of the country, and most of the production is based there; more than 86% of the country’s electrical energy is consumed in Lomé (AfDB, 2015).

References

  • Arias, O.S. 2007. Informality, earnings, and welfare. In Informality: Exit and exclusion, ed. G.E. Perry, et al., 79–99. Singapore: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, O.S., and W.F. Maloney. 2007. The Razón de Ser of the Informal Worker. In Informalité: Exit and exclusion, ed. G.E. Perry, et al., 43–75. Singapore: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuran M., and E. Kalugina. 2005. Subjective welfare and the informal sector: the case of Russia, Working Paper, ROSES Paris I, TEAM CNRS, Paris.

  • Binder, M., and A. Coad. 2010. Life satisfaction and self-employment: A matching approach. Evolutionary Economics Group. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9413-9·.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., and A. Oswald. 2004. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88: 1359–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G., and A.J. Oswald. 1998. What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics 16 (1): 26–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. 2020. Income and effort: An Instrumental variables approach. Atlantic Economic Journal 47: 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-019-09644-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark A.E. 2004. What makes a good job? Evidence from OECD countries, Paris, Delta, document de travail, 2004–28.

  • Clark, A.E. 1996. Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 34 (2): 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.E. 1997. Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics 4 (4): 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.E., and A.J. Oswald. 1994. Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal 104: 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., and A.J. Oswald. 1996. Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics 61: 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogneau D. 2001. Formation du revenu, segmentation et discrimination sur le marché du travail d’une ville en développement: Antananarivo fin de siècle , Paris, Dial, document de travail 2001–18.

  • Congregado, E., J.M. Millán, and C. Román. 2009. The emergence of new entrepreneurs in Europe, Mimeo, Universidad de Huelva, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1535422.

  • D’Addio A.C., T. Ericsson, P. Frijters. 2003. An Analysis of the Determinants of Job Satisfaction when Individuals’ Baseline Satisfaction Levels May Differ. Centre for Applied Microeconometrics, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, DT 2003-16 CAM. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600707357.

  • DeSoto, H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism triumphs in the west and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docquier, F., and Z. Iftikhar. 2019. Brain drain, informality and inequality: A search-and-matching Model for Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Economics 120: 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R.A. 2001. Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal 111: 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquête régionale intégrée sur l’emploi et le secteur informel (ERI-ESI). 2017. Rapport de synthèse, Ministère de la planification du Développement et de la Coopération.

  • Falco, P., W.F. Maloney, and B. Rijkers. 2011. Self-employment and informality in Africa: Panel evidence from satisfaction data. Oxford: CSAE/World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G.S. 2005. A Guide to Multisector Labor Market Models, 0505. Washington, DC: World Bank, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, G.S. 1990. Labour market modeling and the urban informal sector: Theory and evidence. In The informal sector revisited, ed. D. Turnham, B. Salomé, and A. Schwarz. Paris: OECD Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., and A. Stutzer. 2002. Happiness & economics. How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Serrano C. 2008. Does size matter? The influence of firm size on working conditions and job satisfaction, Essex, Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER), Working Paper 2008-30.

  • Gujarati, D., and N. Sangeetha. 2007. Basic econometrics, 4th ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Iglezias, F., and M. Riboud. 1988. Intergenerational effects on fertility behavior and earnings mobility in Spain. Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (4): 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idson, T.L. 1990. Establishment size, job satisfaction, and the structure of work. Applied Economics 22: 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849000000130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Organization. 2014. Transition vers le marché du travail des jeunes femmes et hommes en Afrique Sub-Saharienne , Bureau International du Travail, Genève.

  • Jütting, J.P., and J.R. de Laiglesia, eds. 2009. Is Informal Normal? Towards more and better jobs in developing countries. Paris: OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuepie, M., C. Nordman, and F. Roubau. 2009. Education and earnings in Urban West Africa. Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (2009): 491–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy-Garboua, L., and C. Montmarquette. 2004. Reported job satisfaction: What does it mean? Journal of Socio-Economics 33: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School 28 (2): 139–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Castano, H. 1989. Le secteur informel, substitut d’un système d’assurances sociales en Colombie. Problèmes D’amérique Latine 92: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malam, M.N. 2018. Diplômes et emplois informels au Niger : les enseignements de l’enquête nationale sur l’emploi et le secteur informel. Revue Internationale Des Economistes De Langue Française 3 (1): 180–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W.F. 2004. Informality revisited. World Development 32 (7): 1159–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurin, E. 2001. The impact of parental income on early schooling transitions A re-examination using data over three generations”. Journal of Public Economics 85 (2002): 301–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, F., and C. Wallace. 2008. What are the reasons for differences in job satisfaction across Europe ? Individual, Compositional, and Institutional Explanations, European Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakotomanana, F. 2011. Les travailleurs du secteur informel sont-ils plus heureux : Le cas de l’agglomération d’Antananarivo , in Secteur informel urbain, marché du travail et pauvreté. Essais d’analyse sur le cas de Madagascar: Thèse de doctorat, Université Bordeaux IV, Décembre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrakoto, M., and F. Roubaud. 2006. Les déterminants du bien-être individuel en Afrique francophone : Le poids des institutions. Afrique Contemporaine 220: 191–223. https://doi.org/10.3917/afco.220.0191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razafindrakoto, M., and F. Roubaud. 2013, La satisfaction dans l'emploi : une mesure de la qualité de l'insertion professionnelle en regard des aspirations. In: De Vreyer, P., and F. Roubaud (Eds.) Les marchés urbains du travail en Afrique subsaharienne, IRD Editions et AFD, pp. 125–150.

  • Razafindrakoto M., F. Roubaud and J.-M. Wachsberger. 2012. Travailler dans le secteur informel: choix ou contrainte? Une analyse de la satisfaction dans l'emploi au Vietnam, dans J-P Cling et al, L’économie informelle dans les pays en développement, pp. 47–66.

  • Zerbo, A. 2006. Marché du travail et pauvreté en Afrique Subsaharienne : un modèle d’analyse Document de Travail n°129; Centre d’économie du développement, Institut fédératif de recherche sur les dynamiques économiques, Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Korem Ayira.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6, and 7 and Figs. 1 and 2.

Table 4 Results with income not instrumented
Table 5 Factors of satisfaction and dissatisfaction
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of the density of propensity scores in the two sectors before and after matching. Note that the left part shows the distribution of propensity scores before matching for the two sectors (formal and informal) and that the right part shows the distribution of propensity scores after matching in the two sectors of activity

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagnosis of box plots of propensity scores before pairing and after pairing. The left side shows the box plots of the data (propensity scores) before matching for the two sectors (formal and informal) while the right side shows the box plots of the formal and informal sectors after matching

Table 6 Accuracy of the propensity score match for the mean of the covariates used
Table 7 Impact of the formal sector on job satisfaction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayira, K. Working in the Informal Sector in Togo: Choice or Constraint?. Eur J Dev Res 34, 2598–2623 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00468-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00468-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation