Abstract
Digital platforms play an increasing role across socio-economic sectors in developing countries yet development research to date on this topic has been limited and under-conceptualised. To help facilitate such research in future, this paper presents and applies the “multi-level perspective” as a framework to understand platforms in development as socio-technical transitions. Analysing a successful ride-hailing platform—EasyTaxi in Colombia—it finds what was originally a niche innovation then effected a socio-technical transition within Bogotá’s taxi regime. Although there are some issues in applying the framework, it is found to have a factoral, scalar and longitudinal holism that were lacking in existing conceptualisations within the literature on platforms and developing countries. The multi-level perspective offers insights into the process of innovation, rapidity of scaling, and development impacts relating to resource endowments, institutional formalisation, and shifts in power. The framework may therefore be a useful lens for development researchers seeking to better understand digital platforms.
Résumé
Les plateformes numériques jouent un rôle de plus en plus important dans les secteurs socio-économiques des pays en développement. Pourtant, à ce jour, la recherche sur ce sujet a été limitée et peu conceptualisée. Afin de faciliter ce type de recherche à l’avenir, cet article présente et applique le cadre de la «perspective multi-niveaux» pour envisager les plateformes comme des transitions sociotechniques, dans le domaine du développement. En analysant une plateforme de covoiturage qui a eu du succès - EasyTaxi en Colombie – l’étude découvre que ce qui était à l’origine une innovation, une niche, a par la suite provoqué une transition socio-technique dans le milieu des taxis de Bogotá. Bien qu’il y ait quelques problèmes dans l’application du cadre, il s’avère qu’il dispose d’un holisme fondé sur plusieurs facteurs, scalaire et longitudinal, qui faisait défaut dans les cadres conceptuels existants qui figurent dans les publications sur les plateformes et sur les pays en développement. La perspective à plusieurs niveaux offre un aperçu du processus d’innovation, de la rapidité de la mise à l’échelle et des impacts sur le développement liés aux dotations en ressources, à la formalisation institutionnelle et aux changements au niveau du pouvoir. Le cadre peut donc être un prisme utile pour les chercheurs en développement qui cherchent à améliorer leur compréhension quant aux plateformes numériques.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As one indicator, in seven leading development studies journals by mid-2020 (Development and Change, Development Policy Review, European Journal of Development Research, Journal of Development Studies, Journal of International Development, Third World Quarterly, World Development), there were only five published papers with ‘platform’ in the title, only one of which related to digital platforms. The four non-digital-platform papers referred to platforms in the sense of an institutional or economic foundation for development activity.
A total of 107 papers identified in mid-2020 from the first 200 items returned by the Google Scholar search: intitle:platform (digital AND (“developing countries” OR “developing country” OR "global South") AND (growth OR expansion OR scaling OR adoption OR impact)). These do not represent the totality of all literature relating to platforms and developing countries but these papers specifically signal their interest in platforms by using the term in the title, and reflect coverage of the main issues of relevance. The other 93 papers studied non-digital platforms and/or did not relate to developing countries and/or were inaccessible.
Acknowledging that these features are not universal to developing countries nor are they absent from high-income countries but they are typical of developing countries.
Our literature review also indicated that a case study approach has been typical of analyses of digital platforms in developing countries.
A few local customisations were still required e.g. around ways to specify passenger location; something notoriously difficult in Bogotá and other Colombian cities. However, the technical design of the platform and app allowed it to immediately customise (e.g. in terms of map, language, taxi links) to the location in which it was opened (EasyTaxi Manager 3).
By 2018, the figure was 110,000 with more than two million passenger-journeys per month (Gonzalez 2018).
Though the latter includes Tappsi.
Drivers cannot rate passengers: they have requested this but EasyTaxi refused, saying this would prevent potential for racial discrimination by drivers for which they might be held liable.
References
Alrasheedi, M., L.F. Capretz, and A. Raza. 2015. Instructor Perspectives of Mobile Learning Platform: An Empirical Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.05645.
Andriani, D.P., W.W. Putro, S.I.K. Sari, A. Putri, N. Aini, and A.A. Anwar. 2019. Decision-making model for determinant factors of business digital platform adoption by SMEs. In Proceedings of the 13th International Interdisciplinary Studies Seminar, IISS 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 30–31 Oct.
Arora, P., and L.H. Thompson. 2019. Crowdsourcing as a Platform for Digital Labor Unions. International Journal of Communication 12: 2314–2332.
Artopoulos, A., J. Huarte, A.L. Rivoir, and V. Cancela. 2019. Mapping Rioplatense Platform Economy. Ottawa: IDRC.
Avelino, F., J. Grin, B. Pel, and S. Jhagroe. 2016. The Politics of Sustainability Transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 (5): 557–567.
AWS. 2015. About EasyTaxi, Amazon Web Services, Seattle, WA. https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/easy-taxi/.
Ballen Pachon, L.F. 2012. La Fiebre Amarilla en Bogotá: Los Taxímetros Fuera de Control. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario.
Bonina, C., K. Koskinen, B. Eaton, and A. Gawer. 2021. Digital Platforms for Development: Foundations and Research Agenda. Information Systems Journal, advance online publication.
Bourreau, M., and T. Valetti. 2015. Competition and Interoperability in Mobile Money Platform Markets: What Works and What Doesn’t? Communications & Strategies 1 (99): 11–32.
Brail, S. 2020. World Cities of Ride-Hailing. Urban Geography, advance online publication.
Chrysantina, A., G. Sanjaya, and M. Pinard. 2019. Improving Health Information Management Capacity with Digital Learning Platform. Procedia Computer Science 161: 195–203.
Constantinides, P., O. Henfridsson, and G.G. Parker. 2018. Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age. Information Systems Research 29 (2): 381–400.
Dahlman, C. 2007. Technology, Globalization, and International Competitiveness: Challenges for Developing Countries. In Industrial Development for the 21st Century, 29–83. United Nations, New York.
Duncombe, R., and R. Boateng. 2009. Mobile Phones and Financial Services in Developing Countries. Third World Quarterly 30 (7): 1237–1258.
Feder, G., R.E. Just, and D. Zilberman. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33 (2): 255–298.
Fink, H.A.B.F. 2011. Corrupción en la Policía de Tránsito. Una Primera Aproximación a Través de Entrevistas con Taxistas Colombianos. Relaciones 32 (126): 67–85.
Foster, C., and R. Heeks. 2013. Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers. The European Journal of Development Research 25 (3): 333–355.
Gawer, A. 2014. Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms. Research Policy 43 (7): 1239–1249.
Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-Study. Research Policy 31 (8): 1257–1274.
Geels, F.W. 2004. From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.
Geels, F.W. 2010. Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-level Perspective. Research Policy 39 (4): 495–510.
Geels, F.W. 2011. The Multi-level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 24–40.
Geels, F.W. 2014. Regime Resistance Against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-level Perspective. Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5): 21–40.
Gonzalez, M.C. 2018. Easy Taxi y Tappsi se Fusionan y Duplicarían su Capacidad, Portafolio, 11 Jun. https://www.portafolio.co/negocios/easy-taxi-y-tappsi-se-fusionan-y-duplicarian-su-capacidad-517956.
Griffin, O. 2016. Uber’s Colombian Speed Bumps, TechCrunch, 24 Mar. https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/24/ubers-colombian-speed-bumps/.
Hanna, N.K. 2010. e-Transformation: Enabling New Development Strategies. New York: Springer.
Heeks, R. 2018. Information and Communication Technology for Development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Heeks, R., K. Eskelund, J.E. Gomez-Morantes, F. Malik, and B. Nicholson. 2020. Digital Labour Platforms in the Global South: Filling or Creating Institutional Voids? GDI Digital Development Working Paper no. 86, University of Manchester, UK.
Ibanez Perez, M.P. 2012. Viabilidad Técnica y Financiera del Servicio de Taxis en el Sistema Integrado de Transporte Público. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
ITU. 2020. ICT Eye. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
Jha, S.K., A. Pinsonneault, and L. Dubé. 2016. The Evolution of an ICT Platform-Enabled Ecosystem for Poverty Alleviation. MIS Quarterly 40 (2): 431–445.
Johnston, A., and A. Sasson. 1986. New Technologies and Development. Paris: UNESCO.
Kash, G., and D. Hidalgo. 2014. The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Public Transport in Bogotá. Colombia, Public Transport 6: 107–135.
Keskinen, P., N. Arvila, H. Winschiers-Theophilus, and M. Nieminen. 2020. The Effect of Digital Community-Based Tourism Platform to Hosts’ Livelihood. In International Development Informatics Association Conference, pp. 3–16. Cham: Springer.
Koskinen, K., C. Bonina, and B. Eaton. 2019. Digital Platforms in the Global South: Foundations and Research Agenda. In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, pp. 319–330. Cham: Springer.
Lu, A.J., and X. Xu. 2020. “Learning for the Rise of China”: Exploring Uses and Gratifications of State-Owned Online Platform. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4 (CSCW1): 1–25.
Malhotra, C., A. Sharma, N. Agarwal, and I. Malhotra. 2019. Review of Digital Citizen Engagement (DCE) Platform. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 148–155. ACM, New York, NY.
McConnell, K. 2011. Brazilian Entrepreneurs Innovate with Smartphones, US Mission Geneva, 23 Nov. https://geneva.usmission.gov/2011/11/25/brazilian-smartphones/.
Meltzer, J.P., and C.P. Marulanda. 2016. Digital Colombia. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moitra, A., A. Kumar, and A. Seth. 2018. An Analysis of Community Mobilization Strategies of a Voice-Based Community Media Platform in Rural India. Information Technologies & International Development 14: 116–133.
Mukerji, M., and P.S. Roy. 2019. Platform Interactions and Emergence of an Organizational Field: Case Study on Ola. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.2113.
Muse, T. 2013. The Danger of the Millionaire Ride, Newsweek, 26 Jun. http://www.newsweek.com/2013/06/26/danger-millionaire-ride-237630.html.
Offenhuber, D. 2019. The Platform and the Bricoleur—Improvisation and Smart City Initiatives in Indonesia. Environment and Planning B 46 (8): 1565–1580.
Oliveira, R. 2013. Dicas de Tallis Gomes (Ceo do EasyTaxi) sobre como Criar uma Startup de Sucesso, SmallData, 8 Nov. http://smalldata.com.br/dicas-de-tallis-gomes-ceo-easy-taxi-sobre-como-criar-uma-startup-de-sucesso/.
Okereke, C., A. Coke, M. Geebreyesus, T. Ginbo, J.J. Wakeford, and Y. Mulugetta. 2019. Governing Green Industrialisation in Africa. World Development 115: 279–290.
Omulo, G., and E.M. Kumeh. 2020. Farmer-to-Farmer Digital Network as a Strategy to Strengthen Agricultural Performance in Kenya. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 158: 120120.
Pang, H. 2018. Is Mobile App a New Political Discussion Platform? PLoS ONE 13 (8): e0202244.
Perera, M., and D. Aboal. 2019. The Impact of a Mathematics Computer-Assisted Learning Platform on Students’ Mathematics Test Scores. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.
Renner-Micah, A., J. Effah, and R. Boateng. 2020. Institutional Effects on National Health Insurance Digital Platform Development and Use. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, pp. 28–38. Cham: Springer.
Rodriguez-Valencia, A. 2014. Taxicab Operation in Bogotá, Colombia. Transportation Research Record 2416 (1): 92–99.
Saldana, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
Scheller, F. 2012. ‘App’ de Táxi Recebe Aporte de R$ 10 Milhões, Estadao, 13 Oct. https://economia.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,app-de-taxi-recebe-aporte-de-r-10-milhoes-imp-,944908.
Scott, W.R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Shao, T., and M. Kenney. 2018. Ctrip: China’s Online Travel Platform—Local Giant or Global Competitor?. Available at SSRN 3153836.
Stewart, E. 2013. Easy Taxi Recibió Inversión de US$15 Millones de Rocket Internet, PulsoSocial, 25 Jun. https://pulsosocial.com/2013/06/25/easy-taxi-recibio-inversion-de-us15-millones-de-rocket-internet/.
Surie, A., and J. Koduganti. 2016. The Emerging Nature of Work in Platform Economy Companies in Bengaluru, India. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, 5(3).
Thaipisutikul, T., and S. Tuarob. 2017. MOOCs as an Intelligent Online Learning Platform in Thailand. In 2017 10th International Conference on Ubi-media Computing and Workshops, pp. 1–5. IEEE, New York, NY.
Ugur, M., and A. Mitra. 2017. Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries. World Development 96: 1–18.
Wade, J. 2017. National Taxi Driver Protest against Uber Clogs Roads across Colombia, Finance Colombia, 10 May. http://www.financecolombia.com/nationwide-taxi-driver-protest-against-uber-clogs-roads-across-colombia/.
World Bank. 2016. Digital Dividends: World Development Report 2016. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yadav, K., N.T. Yaduraju, V. Balaji, and T.V. Prabhakar. 2015. ICTs in Knowledge Management: The Case of the Agropedia Platform for Indian Agriculture. Knowledge Management for Development Journal 11 (2): 5–22.
Yasmin, T., M.A. Farrelly, and B.C. Rogers. 2018. Evolution of Water Governance in Bangladesh. World Development 109: 386–400.
Ye, L., and H. Yang. 2020. From Digital Divide to Social Inclusion: A Tale of Mobile Platform Empowerment in Rural Areas. Sustainability 12 (6): 2424.
Yin, R.K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yu, J., Y. Wen, J. Jin, and Y. Zhang. 2019. Towards a Service-Dominant Platform for Public Value Co-Creation in a Smart City. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142: 168–182.
Zeiderman, A. 2016. Endangered City: The Politics of Security and Risk in Bogotá. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Acknowledgements
We thank reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper, including one presented and published in the proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries held in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 1-3 May 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez-Morantes, J.E., Heeks, R. & Duncombe, R. Conceptualising Digital Platforms in Developing Countries as Socio-Technical Transitions: A Multi-level Perspective Analysis of EasyTaxi in Colombia. Eur J Dev Res 34, 978–1002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00409-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00409-w