Abstract
Party system stability is core to new democracies. In Myanmar’s 2015 general elections, more than 90 political parties competed but only 11 won seats. Will the proliferation of parties undermine Myanmar’s party system stability? Given its single-member plurality electoral system and ethno-geographically segregated electoral landscape, what kind of ethnic parties are likely to be electable? This paper addresses these questions by examining how Myanmar’s electoral system affects the electability of small ethnic parties and party system stability. Specifically, we compare the mechanical and psychological effects of the electoral system on ethnic parties and voters since the creation of an ethnically segregated geographical landscape after 2008. For mechanical effects, we compare the degree of disproportionality, extra or ‘bonus’ seats, and how malapportionment affects small ethnic parties. For psychological effects, we examine how electoral experiences shape voting behavior and ethnic party strategy. Our findings, based on limited electoral data and recent party developments, indicate that, in addition to the mechanical effects of electoral institutions, the electoral success of ethnic parties are dependent on the geographic distribution of seats, concentration of voter support, strategic fielding of candidates in underpopulated constituencies, and co-ordination with other parties to prevent vote splitting.
Résumé
La stabilité des partis électorales est un élément central pour les nouvelles démocraties. Dans les élections du 2015 au Myanmar, plus de 90 partis ont participé, mais ils n’ont gagne que 11 sièges. Est-ce que la prolifération des parties va nuire à la stabilité du système partitaire du Myanmar ? Compte tenu de son système électoral uninominal majoritaire à un tour, et de son paysage électoral ségrégué en base a des lignes ethno-géographiques, quel genre de partis ethniques sont susceptibles d’être élus ? Cette étude répond à ces questions en examinant comment le système électoral au Myanmar influence soit l’éligibilité des petits partis ethniques, soit la stabilité du système pluripartite. Plus spécifiquement, on compare les effets mécaniques et psychologiques du système électorale sur les partis et les électeurs ethniques depuis la création, en 2008, d’un paysage géographique informé par la ségrégation ethnique. En ce qui concerne les effets mécaniques, on confronte le dégrée de disproportionnalité, les sièges ‘extra’ ou ‘bonus’, et comment le déséquilibre dans l’approportionnément (ou découpage électorale) influence les petits partis ethniques. En ce qui concerne les effets psychologiques, nous examinons comment l’expérience électorale influence le comportement électoral et les stratégies des partis ethniques. Nos résultats - bases sur des données électorales limités, et sur les développements les plus récents des partis politiques - indiquent que, outre les effets mécaniques des institutions électorales, le succès électorale des partis ethniques dépendent de : la distribution géographique des sièges; la concentration du support électorale; la présentation stratégique des candidats dans des circonscriptions sous-peuplées; et de la coordination avec d’autres partis afin de prévenir une division du vote.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Table 2 for full list of parties and abbreviations.
As Duverger’s law states, “the simple-majority single-ballot system favours the two-party system” (1954).
There are trade-offs between representation and accountability, the ballot structure, district magnitude, effective threshold, malapportionment, assembly size, and electoral formulae that interact differently depending on the spatial distribution of voters (Lijphart 1994; Norris 1997). All these factors have an effect on the representativeness of the Lower House and the development of the party system.
See Coakley (2008, p. 770) for explanations of how ethnic parties challenge more established parties.
S. 161 of the 2008 Constitution provides representation in States/Regions for minority groups without a designated SAZ in that state but make up at least 0.1% of the Union population (TNI 2014).
A group is considered regionally-based if they are located in one region/in particular regions that are easily distinguishable on a map; see GeoEPR dataset (Wucherpfennig et al. 2011).
In 2015, ANP won 12 seats; SNLD won 12 seats; TPNP and PAO won 3 seats each; and ZCD won 2 seats (ICG 2015).
See The Carter Report for details of Myanmar’s malapportionment (2016, 6).
The average constituency size was found to be 105,524 voters. The 10 smallest townships averaged 3574 registered voters, the 10 largest townships averaged over 297,000 (The Carter Center 2016, 27).
References
Aung, Aung. 2018. Understanding Ethnic Political Parties in Myanmar: The Cases of Mon and Karen States. ISEAS 57: 10.
Aung, Nyan Lynn. 2015. Language Barrier Hampers Election in Chin State. The Myanmar Times, October 22, 2015. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/17137-language-barrier-hampers-election-in-chin-state.html..
Aung, Nyan Lynn. 2016. Arakan National Party Prepares to Split. The Myanmar Times, September 13, 2016. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/22482-arakan-national-party-prepares-to-split.html.
Barkan, Joel D. 1998. Rethinking the Applicability of Proportional Representation for Africa. In Elections and Conflict Management in Africa, ed. Timothy D. Sisk and Andrew Reynolds. Washington, DC: Institute of Peace Press.
Basedau, Matthias, and Anika Moroff. 2011. Parties in Chains: Do Ethnic Party Bans in Africa Promote Peace? Party Politics 17 (2): 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810391148.
BBC News. 2010. Burma Election: Ethnic Parties. November 3, 2010, sec. Asia-Pacific. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-11595984.
Benoit, Kenneth. 2006. Duverger’s Law and the Study of Electoral Systems. French Politics 4 (1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200092.
Bernauer, Julian, and Daniel Bochsler. 2011. Electoral Entry and Success of Ethnic Minority Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: A Hierarchical Selection Model. Electoral Studies 30 (4): 738–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.07.001.
Blais, A., and L. Maiscotte. 1996. Electoral Systems. In Comparative Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. L. Le duc, R. Neimi, and P. Norris. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
BNI. 2010. Election Report, 2010: Myanmar (Burma). Burma News International. http://burmaactionireland.org/images/uploads/BNI_report_on_pre-election_situation-1.pdf.
Blais, Andre, and Richard K. Carty. 1991. The Psychological Impact of Electoral Laws: Measuring Duverger’s Elusive Factor. British Journal of Political Science 21 (1): 79–93.
Blais, Andre, and Indridi H. Indridason. 2007. Making Candidates Count: The Logic of Electoral Alliances in Two-Round Legislative Elections. The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 193–205.
Bochsler, Daniel. 2010. Electoral Rules and the Representation of Ethnic Minorities in Post-Communist Democracies. European Yearbook of Minority Issues 7 (2007/8): 153–180.
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2007. Electoral Systems, Party Systems, and Ethnicity in Africa, 168–193. Money and Violence: Votes.
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2010. Ethnic Party Bans and Institutional Engineering in Nigeria. Democratization 17 (4): 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2010.491197.
Bogaards, Matthijs, Matthias Basedau, and Christof Hartmann (eds.). 2015. Ethnic Party Bans in Africa, 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bower, Ernest, Michael Green, Christopher Johnson, and Murray Hiebert. 2012. State of the Nation and Recommendations for U.S. Policy. Washington, DC: CSIS, Southeast Asia Program.
Budge, Ian, and M.J. Laver. 1992. Coalition Theory, Government Policy and Party Policy. In Party Policy and Government Coalitions, ed. M.J. Laver and Ian Budge, 1–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22368-8_1.
Burke, Adam. 2015. Why Didn’t Ethnic Parties Do Better in Myanmar’s Elections? New Mandala Inquirer, November, article.
Burke, Adam, Nicola Williams, Patrick Barron, Kim Jollife, and Thomas Carr. 2017. The Contested Areas of Myanmar: Subnational Conflict, Aid, and Development. Yangon: The Asia Foundation. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ContestedAreasMyanmarReport.pdf.
Callahan, Mary P. 2005. Making Enemies: War and State Building in Burma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed by Kanchan Chandra. Cambridge Core. March 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573481.
Chandra, Kanchan. 2005. Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability. Perspectives on Politics 3 (02): 235–252.
Chandra, Kanchan. 2011. What Is an Ethnic Party? Party Politics 17 (2): 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810391153.
Coakley, John. 2008. Ethnic Competition and the Logic of Party System Transformation. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00824.x.
CPCS. 2011. 2010 Myanmar General Elections Learning and Sharing for Future. Observation Report. Siem Reap, Cambodia: Center for Peace and Conflict Studies. http://www.centrepeaceconflictstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2010-Myanmar-Observer-report.pdf.
Croissant, Aurel, Gabriele Bruns, and Marei John. 2002. Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia: A Comparative Perspective. Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy. Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do? American Political Science Review 96 (04): 729–743.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London/New York: Methuen/Wiley.
EMR. 2015. Important Data of 2015 General Election. Yangon: Enlightened Myanmar Research.
Ferrara, Federico, and Erik S. Herron. 2005. Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 16–31.
Fink, Christina. 2018. Myanmar: Religious Minorities and Constitutional Questions. Asian Affairs 49 (2): 259–277.
Gallagher, M. 1991. Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C.
Geddes, Andrew. 2001. Explaining Ethnic Minority Representation: Contemporary Trends in the Shadow of the Past. British Elections & Parties Review 11 (1): 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880108413057.
Golder, Sona N. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Grofman, Bernard, William Koetzle, and Thomas Brunell. 1997. An Integrated Perspective on the Three Potential Sources of Partisan Bias: Malapportionment, Turnout Differences, and the Geographic Distribution of Party Vote Shares. Electoral Studies 16 (4): 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00037-1.
Gunther, Richard, and Larry Diamond. 2003. Species of Political Parties: A New Typology. Party Politics 9 (2): 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030092003.
Harding, Andrew, and Khin Khin Oo (eds.). 2017. Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar. Oxford/Portland: Hart.
Hicken, Allen. 2004. Asia and the Pacific: General Overview. In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. Josep M. Colomer, 453–474. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hicken, Allen. 2008. Political Engineering and Party Regulation in Southeast Asia. In Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific, ed. Benjamin Reilly. USA: Oxford University Press.
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Ibenskas, Raimondas. 2016. Marriages of Convenience: Explaining Party Mergers in Europe. The Journal of Politics 78 (2): 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1086/683685.
Ibenskas, Raimondas, and Nicole Bolleyer. 2018. Forms of Inter-Party Cooperation: Electoral Coalitions and Party Mergers. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 32 (3): 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325418755299.
ICG. 2015. The Myanmar Elections: Results and Implications. 147. Crisis Group Asia Briefing. Yangon: Crisis Group. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs21/ICG-2015-12-09-the-myanmar-elections-results-and-implications-en-red.pdf.
John, Sarah. 2014. Ethnic Minorities and Proportional Representation in Myanmar. FairVote. September 5, 2014. https://www.fairvote.org/minority-representation-and-proportional-representation-in-myanmar.
Jolliffe, Kim. 2015. Ethnic Armed Conflict and Territorial Administration in Myanmar. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation. https://asiafoundation.org/resources/pdfs/ConflictTerritorialAdministrationfullreportENG.pdf.
Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kean, Thomas, and Wa Lone. 2015. Kayah State: Will History Repeat on Nov 8? The Myanmar Times, October 28, 2015. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/17245-kayah-state-will-history-repeat-on-nov-8.html
Kempel, Susanne, Chan Myawe Aung Sun Sun, and Aung Tun. 2015. Myanmar Political Parties at a Time of Transition: Political Party Dynamics at the National and Local Level. Yangon: Pyoe Pin Programme.
Kipgen, Nehginpao. 2015. Ethnicity in Myanmar and Its Importance to the Success of Democracy. Ethnopolitics 14 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2014.926610.
Lall, Marie, Nwe Nwe San, Theint Theint Myat, and Yin Nyein Aye. 2015. Myanmar’s Ethnic Parties and the 2015 Elections. European Union: International Management Group (IMG).
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lochery, Tom. 2014. Proportional Representation in Myanmar: More Divisive Than Inclusive. The Irrawaddy. June 28, 2014. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/opinion/proportional-representation-in-burma-more-divisive-than-inclusive.
Lublin, David. 2009. Electoral Systems and the Success of Ethnoregional Parties. In APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper, 62. Toronto, Canada.
Lublin, David, and Matthew Wright. 2013. Engineering Inclusion: Assessing the Effects of Pro-Minority Representation Policies. Electoral Studies 32: 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.06.001.
Lwin, Ei Ei Toe. 2018. By-Elections: A Wakeup Call for the NLD. The Myanmar Times. November 5, 2018. https://www.mmtimes.com/news/elections-wakeup-call-nld.html.
Lwin, Nan. 2018. Ethnic Political Parties Merge to Seek Stronger Representation in 2020 Election. The Irrawaddy. September 11, 2018. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/politics/ethnic-political-parties-merge-to-seek-stronger-representation-in-2020-election.html.
Lwin, Ei Ei Toe, and Nyan Lynn Aung. 2017. Wracked by Conflicts, Arakan National Party Splits Again. The Myanmar Times. July 26, 2017. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/yangon/26955-wracked-by-conflicts-arakan-national-party-splits-again.html.
Mainwaring, S. 1998. Rethinking Party Systems Theory in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Importance of Party System Institutionalization. The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.
Marston, Hunter. 2013. Myanmar’s Electoral System: Reviewing the 2010 and 2012 Elections and Looking Ahead to the 2015 General Elections. Asian Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2013.864515.
Martin, Michael F. 2010. Burma’s 2010 Election Campaign: Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41447.pdf.
Massicotte, Louis, and André Blais. 1999. Mixed Electoral Systems: A Conceptual and Empirical Survey. Electoral Studies 18 (3): 341–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00063-8.
McPherson, Poppy. 2017. Aung San Suu Kyi: Myanmar’s Great Hope Fails to Live up to Expectations. The Guardian, March 31, 2017, sec. World news. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/31/aung-san-suu-kyi-myanmars-great-hope-fails-to-live-up-to-expectations.
MERIN. 2020. Myanmar Electoral Resource & Information Network. Myanmar Electoral Resource & Information Network. https://merin.org.mm/en.
MIMU. 2014. The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census. Yangon: Myanmar Information Management Unit. http://themimu.info/census-data.
Monroe, Burt L. 1994. Disproportionality and Malapportionment: Measuring Electoral Inequity. Electoral Studies 13 (2): 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)90031-0.
Norris, Pippa. 1997. Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems. International Political Science Review 18 (3): 297–312.
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Ballots Not Bullets: Testing Consociational Theories of Ethnic Conflict, Electoral Systems and Democratization. In The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy, ed. Andrew Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oudot, Carole, and Matthieu Baudey. 2015. Ethnic Parties Take on the Giants in Kayah State. The Myanmar Times, October 23, 2015. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/17172-ethnic-parties-take-on-the-giants-in-kayah-state.html.
Reilly, Benjamin. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadan, Mandy. 2016. Can Democracy Cure Myanmar’s Ethnic Conflicts? Current History 115 (782): 114–219.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saw, Kyi Pyar Chit, and Matthew Arnold. 2014. Administering the State in Myanmar. Subnational Governance in Myanmar Discussion Paper Series. Yangon: The Asia Foundation.
Selway, Joel. 2015. Ethnic Accommodation and Electoral Rules in Ethno-Geographically Segregated Societies: PR Outcomes Under FPTP in Myanmar Elections. Journal of East Asian Studies 15 (3): 321–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800009103.
Slow, Oliver. 2015. Shan Parties Fight It Out in Kengtung. Frontier Myanmar, November 9, 2015. https://frontiermyanmar.net/en/shan-parties-fight-it-out-in-kengtung.
Smith, Martin. 1994. Ethnic Groups in Burma: Development. London: Democracy and Human Rights.
Smith, Martin. 1999. Burma: Insurgency and the Politics of Ethnicity. 2nd ed. Bangkok: White Lotus Co. Ltd. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/B/bo20847967.html.
Snaing, Yen. 2015. Slow Off the Mark for Smaller Political Parties. The Irrawaddy, September 11, 2015. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/news/slow-off-the-mark-for-burmas-smaller-political-parties.
Snaing, Yen, and Sean Gleeson. 2015. Analysis: Myanmar Ministers’ Election in Kayah State All But Certain. The Irrawaddy, September 9, 2015. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/news/analysis-ministers-election-in-karenni-state-all-but-certain.
Soe, Hein Ko. 2018. The Ethnic Parties’ Dilemma: Merger or Strategic Alliance? Frontier Myanmar. April 18, 2018. https://frontiermyanmar.net/en/the-ethnic-parties-dilemma-merger-or-strategic-alliance.
South, Ashley. 2018. ‘Hybrid Governance’ and the Politics of Legitimacy in the Myanmar Peace Process. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (1): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280.
Steinberg, David I. (ed.). 2014. Myanmar: The Dynamics of an Evolving Polity. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Stokke, Kristian. 2019. Political Parties and Religion in Myanmar. In The Routledge Handbook to Religion and Political Parties, ed. J. Haynes. London: Routledge.
Stokke, Kristian, and Soe Myint Aung. 2019. Transition to Democracy or Hybrid Regime? The Dynamics and Outcomes of Democratization in Myanmar. The European Journal of Development Research, October.. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00247-x.
Stokke, Kristian, Khine Win, and Soe Myint Aung. 2015. Political Parties and Popular Representation in Myanmar’s Democratisation Process. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 34 (3): 3–35.
Stroschein, Sherrill. 2001. Measuring Ethnic Party Success in Romania, Slovakia, and Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism 48 (4): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2001.11655943.
Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Than, Muang Muang Tin. 2013. Ethnic Insurgencies and Peacemaking in Myanmar. The Network.
Thawnghmung, A.M. 2016. The Myanmar Elections 2015: Why the National League for Democracy Won a Landslide Victory. Critical Asian Studies 48 (1): 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1134929.
Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung. 2013. The Other Karen in Myanmar: Ethnic Minorities and the Struggle without Arms. Plymouth: Lexington.
Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung. 2017. Signs of Life in Myanmar’s Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement? Finding a Way Forward. Critical Asian Studies 49 (3): 379–395.
The Carter Center. 2015. Carter Center Statement on Candidate Scrutiny Process and Campaign Environment in Myanmar. The Carter Center, September 24, 2015. https://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/myanmar-092515-pre-election.htmlpdf.
The Carter Center. 2016. Observing Myanmar’s 2015 General Elections: Final Report. Atlanta: The Carter Center. https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/myanmar-2015-final.pdf.
The Irrawaddy. 2015a. All Mon Region Democracy Party (AMDP). https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/party/all-mon-regions-democracy-party-amdp.
The Irrawaddy. 2015b. Arakan (Rakhine) State. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/region/arakan-rakhine-state.
The Irrawaddy. 2015c. Karen (Kayin) State. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/region/karen-kayin-state.
The Irrawaddy. 2015d. National Unity Party (NUP). https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/party/national-unity-party-nuphtml.
The Irrawaddy. 2015e. Shan State. https://www.irrawaddy.com/election/region/shan-statehtml.
The Irrawaddy. 2017. 2017 By-Elections: The Wrap Up. The Irrawaddy. April 3, 2017. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/politics/2017-by-elections-the-wrap-up.html.
Myanmar Times. 2015. Election Parties. The Myanmar Times, September 2, 2015. https://www.mmtimes.com/national-news/16265-election-parties.html.
TNI. 2010. Unlevel Playing Field: Burma’s Election Landscape. 3. Burma Policy Briefing. Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/files/download/bpb3.pdf.
TNI. 2014. Ethnicity Without Meaning, Data Without Context the 2014 Census, Identity and Citizenship in Burma/Myanmar. 13. Burma Policy Briefing. Amsterdam: TNI. https://www.tni.org/files/download/bpb_13.pdf.
TNI. 2015a. Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar. 16. Myanmar Policy Briefing. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/bpb16_web_16092015.pdf.
TNI. 2015b. The 2015 General Election in Myanmar: What Now for Ethnic Politics? 17. Myanmar Policy Briefing. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute. https://www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/bpb17_web_def.pdf.
Toshihiro, Kudo. 2011. Results of the 2010 Elections in Myanmar: An Analysis. The Institute of Developing Economies. https://www.ide.go.jp/English/Research/Region/Asia/20110104.html.
Wagner, Wolfgang. 2014. The Overstated Merits of Proportional Representation: The Republic of Macedonia as a Natural Experiment for Assessing the Impact of Electoral Systems on Descriptive Representation. Ethnopolitics 13 (5): 483–500.
Wilson, Trevor. 2006. Myanmar’s Long Road to National Reconciliation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Wucherpfennig, Julian, Nils B. Weidmann, Luc Girardin, Lars-Erik Cederman, and Andreas Wimmer. 2011. Politically Relevant Ethnic Groups Across Space and Time: Introducing the GeoEPR Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28 (5): 423–437.
Ziegfeld, Adam. 2013. Are Higher-Magnitude Electoral Districts Always Better for Small Parties? Electoral Studies 32 (1): 63–77.
Zuber, Christina Isabel. 2013. Beyond Outbidding? Ethnic Party Strategies in Serbia. Party Politics 19 (5): 758–777.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). We are grateful to Elin Bjarnegård, Francesca Refsum Jensenius, Mala Htun, and Kristian Stokke for their comments on an earlier version of this paper presented at “Workshop on Development Challenges in Myanmar” at Uppsala University, Sweden, 14–15 Feb 2019. We would also like to thank the editor, two anonymous reviewers and Paul Minnoleti for their suggestions, and to Elaina Nguyen and William Li for their research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Article prepared for the Special Issue for the European Journal DevelopmentResearch “Development Challenges in Myanmar”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, N., Preece, C. Electoral System, Ethnic Parties, and Party System Stability in Myanmar. Eur J Dev Res 32, 431–456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00264-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00264-1