The present study econometrically examines the impacts of an improved road transportation system on labor allocation, input use, and livelihood diversification in an economically lagging part of Bangladesh. Before 1998, the northwest part of Bangladesh, home to 22% of nearly 160 million people, was de-linked from the economically advanced eastern part of Bangladesh. On June 23, 1998, the Jamuna Multipurpose Bridge (JMB) on the river Jamuna was opened for use. The bridge has established direct road and rail transportation systems between the northwestern part and the eastern part of Bangladesh. Using these phenomena, and linking the Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES) data, HIES2000 and HIES2010, this study elucidates the impacts of improved infrastructure on labor allocation and the input application behavior of the sampled households. Applying the difference-in-difference estimation approach, this study demonstrates that the JMB that has linked the northwest and eastern regions has encouraged labor out-migration, resulting in the most vulnerable day-laborers in both farm and non-farm sectors moving to other jobs with relatively high marginal returns. The improved transportation infrastructure had also increased the daily wage rates, which were lower than the comparison group, and the cropping intensity in the Rajshahi and Rangpur divisions. The study, therefore, concludes that investment in infrastructure can be instrumental in unleashing economic growth and alleviating poverty in the economically struggling parts of developing countries.
La présente étude examine économétriquement les effets d'un système de transport routier amélioré sur la répartition de la main-d'œuvre, l'utilisation des intrants et la diversification des moyens de subsistance dans une région en Bangladesh en retard sur le plan économique. Avant 1998, la partie nord-ouest du Bangladesh, qui abritait 22% des quelque 160 millions de personnes, était dissociée de la partie orientale économiquement avancée du Bangladesh. Le 23 juin 1998, le Pont Multifonctionnel Jamuna (JMB) sur la rivière Jamuna a été ouvert. Le pont a établi des systèmes de transport routier et ferroviaire directs entre le nord-ouest et l'est du Bangladesh. En utilisant ces phénomènes et en reliant les données HIES (HIES) et HIES2010 de l'Enquête sur les revenus et les dépenses des ménages (HIES), cette étude élucide les impacts de l'amélioration des infrastructures sur la répartition de la main-d'œuvre et le comportement des ménages échantillonnés en matière d'application des intrants. En appliquant l’approche d’estimation des écarts dans les différences (DID), cette étude démontre que le JMB qui a relié les régions du nord-ouest et de l’est a encouragé la migration de main-d’œuvre, ce qui a permis aux travailleurs les plus vulnérables des secteurs agricole et non agricole de s’orienter à d'autres emplois avec des rendements marginaux relativement élevés. L'amélioration de l'infrastructure de transport avait également augmenté les taux de salaire journaliers qui étaient inférieurs à ceux du groupe de comparaison et l'intensité du système de culture des ménages des divisions de Rajshahi et de Rangpur. L’étude conclut donc que l’investissement dans les infrastructures peut jouer un rôle déterminant dans le décollage de la croissance économique et la réduction de la pauvreté dans les régions économiquement moins développées dans les pays en développement.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
USD1 = 83BDT (approximately).
Cropping intensity= [(Gross cropped area/Net cropped area)] ×100.
ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2000. Project completion report on the Jamuna Bridge Project (Loan 1298-BAN[SF]). PCR BAN 22237. Manila: Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-document/71619/22237-ban-pcr.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2018.
Bangladesh Bridge Authority. 2018. Padma multipurpose bridge project. Dhaka: Bridges Division, Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges. http://site.bba.gov.bd/padma-multipurpose-bridge-3/. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
Bayes, A. 2007. Impact assessment of Jamuna Multipurpose bridge project (JMBP) on poverty reduction. Tokyo: Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC). https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/oda_loan/post/2006/pdf/te03_full.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 1997. Summary report of the Household Expenditure Survey 1995–96. Dhaka: BBS, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning.
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 2011. Bangladesh Household Income & Expenditure Survey 2010: Key findings and results. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning.
BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics). 2017. Preliminary report on household income and expenditure survey 2016. Dhaka: BBS, Statistics and Informatics Division, Ministry of Planning. P-71.
Binswanger, H.P., S.R. Khandker, and M.R. Rosenzweig. 1993. How infrastructure and financial institutions affect agricultural output and investment in India. Journal of Development Economics 41 (2): 337–366.
Blankespoor, B., M.S. Emran, F. Shilpi, and L. Xu. 2018. Transport costs, comparative advantage, and agricultural development: Evidence from Jamuna bridge in Bangladesh. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No.: 86630. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86630/. Accessed 23 May 2018.
Bryan, G., S. Chowdhury, and A.M. Mobarak. 2014. Underinvestment in a profitable technology: The case of seasonal migration in Bangladesh. Econometrica 82 (5): 1671–1748.
Datt, G., and M. Ravallion. 1998. Why have some Indian states done better than others at reducing rural poverty? Economica 65 (257): 17–38.
Deininger, K., D. Byerlee, J. Lindsay, A. Norton, H. Selod, and M. Stickler. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Washington, DC: World Ban. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/Rising-Global-Interest-in-Farmland.pdf. Accessed 06 June 2018.
Dzanku, F.M., M. Jirström, and H. Marstorp. 2015. Yield gap-based poverty gaps in rural sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 67: 336–362.
Fan, S., and C. Chan-Kang. 2008. Regional road development, rural and urban poverty: Evidence from China. Transport Policy 15: 305–314.
Fischer, G., and M. Shah. 2010. Farmland Investments and Food Security. Report No. 64445, Washington, DC and Luxembourg: World Bank and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis contract, Luxembourg, Austria. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/884731468221080363/pdf/644450WP00publ00Security0BOX361537B.pdf. Accessed 06 June 2018.
Gannon, C., and Z. Liu. 1997. Poverty and transport. TWU discussion papers, TWU-30. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTURBANTRANSPORT/Resources/twu-30.pdf. Accessed 07 Feb 2018.
Gibson, J., and S. Rozelle. 2003. Poverty and access to roads in Papua New Guinea. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (1): 159–185.
Gutierrez, C., C. Orecchia, P. Paci, and P. Serneels. 2007. Does employment generation really matter for poverty reduction? Policy Research working paper WPS 4432. Washing DC: Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network, The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/876111468323953962/Does-employment-generation-really-matter-for-poverty-reduction. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.
ILO (International Labor Organization). 2008. Promotion of rural employment for poverty. Report IV. Fourth Item on the agenda. International labor conference, 97th session, 28 May–13 June, 2008. Geneva (Switzerland): ILO. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_091721.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.
ISHN (International Household Survey Network). 2018a. Bangladesh—Household income and expenditure survey 2010. http://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/catalog/2257. Accessed 18 Apr 2018.
ISHN (International Household Survey Network). 2018b. Bangladesh—Household income and expenditure survey 2010. http://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/catalog/135/overview. Accessed 18 April 2018.
Jacoby, H.G. 2000. Access to markets and the benefits of rural roads. The Economic Journal 110 (July): 713–737.
Jenkins, G.P., and G.P. Shukla. 1997. Linking east and west Bangladesh: The Jamuna Bridge Project. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. Special Issue: 121-145. https://evaluationcanada.ca/secure/12-0-121.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018.
Karnani, A. 2011. Reducing poverty through employment. Innovations 6 (2): 73–97.
Khandker, S.R., and W. Mahmud. 2012. Seasonal hunger and public policies: Evidence from northwest Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/140991468208456730/pdf/702680PUB0EPI0067902B09780821395530.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
Khandker, S.R., Z. Bakht, and G.B. Koolwal. 2009. The poverty impact of rural roads: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change 57 (4): 685–722.
Khondker, B.H., and M.M. Mazhab. 2015. Lagging district development. Background study paper for preparation of the seventh five-year plan. Dhaka: Planning Commission, Ministry of Planning. http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/15_Lagging-Regions-Study.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
Khondker, B.H., and M.M Mazhab. 2015. Lagging district development. Background study paper for preparation of the seventh five-year plan. Dhaka: Planning Commission, Ministry of Planning. http://www.plancomm.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/15_Lagging-Regions-Study.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2018.
Lanjouw, J.O., and P. Lanjouw. 2001. The rural non-farm sector: Issues and evidence from developing countries. Agricultural Economics 26 (1): 1–23.
Larson, D.F., R. Muraoka, and K. Otsuka. 2016. Why African rural development strategies must depend on small farms. Global Food Security 10: 39–51.
Lokshin, M., and R. Yemtsov. 2005. Has rural infrastructure rehabilitation in Georgia helped the poor? The World Bank Economic Review 19 (2): 311–333.
Luppino, M., G. Gajewski, S. Zohir, B. Khondker, and D. Crowther. 2004. Estimating the impacts of Jamuna bridge on poverty levels in Bangladesh using SAM and CGE models: a comparative study. Washington DC: The Louis Berger Group, Inc. 2300 N Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20037. http://www.file:///D:/Users/KMOTTALEB/Downloads/Estimating_the_Impacts_of_the_Jamuna_Bridge_on_Pov.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018.
Mahmud, M., and Y. Sawada. 2018. Infrastructure and well-being: Employment effects of Jamuna bridge in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2018.1483415.
Mottaleb, K.A., and T. Sonobe. 2011. An inquiry into the rapid growth of the garment industry in Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change 60 (1): 67–89.
Mottaleb, K.A., and T. Sonobe. 2013. The developing process of rural informal industries in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Journal of Developing Areas 47 (2): 229–249.
Mottaleb, K.A., S. Mohanty, and A. Nelson. 2015. Strengthening market linkages of farm households in developing countries. Applied Economic Perspective and Policy 37 (2): 226–242.
Rahman, M.H., and M.S. Hossain. 2009. Convergence in per capita income across regions in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies 32 (1): 45–60.
Rahut, D.B., and S.M. Micevska. 2012. Livelihood diversification strategies in the Himalayas. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 56 (4): 558–582.
The Economist. 2018. On their bikes: Bangladesh experiments with a new approach to poverty alleviation. January 25, 2018, Dhaka. https://www.economist.com/news/finance-andeconomics/21735597-paying-poor-rural-families-send-seasonal-workers-city-seems-work. Accessed 18 Apr 2018.
UN (The United Nations). 2018. Sustainable development goals. New York: The United Nations. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/hunger/. Accessed 14 May 2018.
van de Walle, D. 2002. Choosing rural road investment to help reduce poverty. World Development 30 (4): 575–589.
Van de Walle, D. 2008. Impact evaluation of rural road projects. Washington DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/372731468158986812/Impact-evaluation-of-rural-road-projects. Accessed 07 Feb 2018.
Vella, F. 1998. Estimating models with sample selection bias: A survey. The Journal of Human Resources 33 (1): 127–169.
Wikipedia. 2018. Bangabandhu bridge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangabandhu_Bridge. Accessed 14 May 2018.
World Bank. 2000. Implementation completion report (IDA-25690) on a credit in the amount of SDR 143.6 million (US$ 200.0 million equivalent) to the People's Republic of Bangladesh, for the Jamuna Bridge Project. Report No. 20587-BD. Washington D.C.: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/310961468205150116/pdf/multi-page.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.
World Bank. 2008. Poverty assessment for Bangladesh: creating opportunities and bridging the east-west divide. Bangladesh development series. Paper no. 26. Dhaka: The World Bank office. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BANGLADESHEXTN/Resources/295759-1240185591585/BanglaPD.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2018.
World Bank. 2014. For upto 800 million rural poor, a strong World Bank commitment to agriculture. Feature Story, November 12, 2014. Washington D.C.: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/11/12/for-up-to-800-million-rural-poor-a-strong-world-bank-commitment-to-agriculture. Accessed 18 Feb 2018.
World Bank. 2017. Employment in agriculture (% of total employment). Washington D.C.: World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
World Bank. 2018. Understanding poverty. Washington DC: The World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview. Accessed 14 May 2018.
Zug, S. 2006. Monga: Seasonal food insecurity in Bangladesh understanding the problem and strategies to Combat. Dhaka: Partnership for Development and Justice (NETZ). https://bangladesch.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Bilder/B_Globales_Lernen/B3.2_Oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/Bangladesch/Entwicklung/Armut_Hunger/Final_Report_Monga_Sebastian_Zug.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2018.
The authors acknowledge three unanimous referees, and the participants of the workshop on “Rural Transformation in the 21st Century: The Challenges of Low-Income, Late-Transforming Countries” organized by the CGIAR PIM in Vancouver, BC, Canada (July 28–August 2, 2018) for their suggestions for improving the paper. We acknowledge the support from CGIAR PIM. The contents and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the authors’ institution. The usual disclaimer applies.
See Table 9.
The first segment of Table 9, in which we considered only the rural respondents (n = 5194), shows that, in general in 2010, the probability that a sampled respondent would be self-employed in the farm sector and a day-laborer in both the farm and non-farm sectors was higher, where the base occupation category is the self-employed operator in the non-farm sector. It shows that, compared to the control group, in general, the likelihoods that respondents of the Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions were self-employed in the farm sector and day-laborers in the farm and the non-farm sectors are positive and significant. In the Rajshahi Division, the respondents, in general, were less likely to work as salaried workers compared to the control group. In 2010, however, the respondents in the Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions were less likely to work as self-employed in the farm sector (p < 0.00) and a day-laborer in the farm and the non-farm sectors (p < 0.00) compared to the control group. The findings lend support to our conjecture that the improved infrastructure that established a direct route to the eastern region encouraged labor out-migration and reallocation from low-paid day-labor jobs to other jobs. It demonstrates the importance of the improved infrastructure on livelihood diversification. Interestingly, in 2010, the likelihood of working as a salaried worker in the Rajshahi Division compared to the control group was not statistically significantly different. This indicates that the proportion of the salaried workers in the Rajshahi Division increased in 2010 compared to 2000 than the control group
In the second second segment of Table 9, we have considered all respondents and added multiplicative dummies for rural respondents consisting of multiplications of the year 2010 dummy, the Rajshahi (RAJD) and Rangpur (RANGD) dummy and the rural dummy (RD). The results show that in both the Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions, the likelihood of being self-employed in the farm was lower in 2010 compared to the control group, but the difference was not significant in the rural areas. This indicates that the importance of the farming sector in the rural areas both in the control and experiment regions is the same. Importantly, the likelihood of working as a day-laborer in both the farm and non-farm sectors in the rural areas of the Rajshahi Division, and the likelihood of working as a day-laborer in the farm sector in the rural area of the Rangpur Division has been reduced significantly by 2010, compared to the control group.
About this article
Cite this article
Mottaleb, K.A., Rahut, D.B. Impacts of Improved Infrastructure on Labor Allocation and Livelihoods: The Case of the Jamuna Multipurpose Bridge, Bangladesh. Eur J Dev Res 31, 750–778 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0186-8
- Road transportation
- Experiment group
- Control group
- Labor allocation