Interrogating Microfinance Performance Beyond Products, Clients and the Environment: Insights From the Work of BRAC in Tanzania
The performance of microfinance organisations can depend on many factors. Current research emphasizes factors pertaining to clients, products, or broader environments, but researchers have paid less attention to the workings and internal systems of microfinance organisations. We explore how variation in performance within an organisation can alter the consequences of loans and their popularity among clients and potential clients. We illustrate with data from BRAC in Tanzania, where the arrival and rapid expansion of BRAC’s microfinance programme provides an apposite case study.
KeywordsMicrofinance BRAC Tanzania Organisational performance
La performance des organisations de microfinance peut dépendre de nombreux facteurs. La recherche actuelle met l’accent sur les facteurs relatifs aux clients, aux produits ou aux environnements plus vastes. Mais les chercheurs ont accordé moins d’attention au fonctionnement et aux systèmes internes des organisations de microfinance. Nous explorons comment la variation de performance au sein d’une organisation peut modifier les résultats des prêts ainsi que leur popularité auprès des clients et des clients potentiels. Nous illustrons avec les données de BRAC en Tanzanie, où l’arrivée et l’expansion rapide du programme de microfinance de BRAC fournit une étude de cas pertinente.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the staff of BRAC Tanzania and BRAC International for allowing us to study their microfinance operations in Tanzania. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers and EJDR’s Editorial team for helpful feedback throughout the review and publication process. Nicola Banks gratefully acknowledges funding from ESRC (ES/K009729/1) under the Future Research Leaders scheme.
- Agier, I., and A. Szafarzy. 2010. Credit officers and loan granting in microfinance: Brazilian evidence. CERMi Working Paper. Brussels: Centre for European Research in Microfinance.Google Scholar
- Aoki, C., and P. Pradhan. 2013. Impact of microfinance services on socio-economic empowerment of the women’s group in Nepal. In Geography of Governance: Dynamics for Local Development, ed. P. Pradhan, J. Buček, and E. Razin, 1–10. Bratislava: International Geographical Union Commission on Geography of Governance.Google Scholar
- Brockington, D., and N. Banks. 2014. Exploring the success of BRAC Tanzania’s microfinance programme. Brooks World Poverty Institute working paper 202.Google Scholar
- Duvendack, M., R. Palmer-Jones, J. Copestake, L. Hooper, Y. Loke, and N. Rao. 2011. What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people? Systematic review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.Google Scholar
- Financial Sector Deepening Trust. 2013. Finscope: Widening your financial future. Dar Es Salaam: Financial Sector Deepening Trust.Google Scholar
- Goetz, A.M. 1996. Local heroes: Patterns of field worker discretion in implementing GAD policy in Bangladesh. Discussion paper 358 Institute of Development Studies (IDS).Google Scholar
- Goetz, A.-M. 2001. Women development workers: Implementing rural credit programmes in Bangladesh. London: Sage Press and Dhaka, Dhaka University Press.Google Scholar
- Hossain, N., and A. Sengupta. 2009. Thinking big, going global: The challenge of BRAC’s global expansion. IDS working paper series, 339.Google Scholar
- Kar, A.K., and R.B. Swain. 2014. Competition in microfinance: Does it affect performance, portfolio quality, and capitalization? In Microfinance Institutions: Financial and Social Performance, ed. R. Mersland, and R.Ø. Strøm, 208–226. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
- Labie, M., P.-G. Méon, and A. Szafarz. 2009. Discrimination in microfinance: The role of credit officers. Centre Emile Bernheim (CEB) working paper, 09(017), 2–22.Google Scholar
- Lascelles, D., and S. Mendelson. 2012. Microfinance banana skins: Staying relevant. New York: The CSFI Survey of Microfinance Risk.Google Scholar
- Lipsky, M. (ed.). 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Loiske, V.-M. 1995. The village that vanished. The roots of erosion in a Tanzanian village. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
- Maitrot, M. 2014. The social performance of microfinance institutions in rural Bangladesh. (PhD.), University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
- Maitrot, M., and M. Niño-Zarazúa. 2017. ‘Poverty and wellbeing impacts of microfinance: What do we know?’. UNU-WIDER Working Paper 2017/190. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.Google Scholar
- Minogue, M. 2001. The internationalization of new public management. In The Internationalization of Public Management: Reinventing the Third World State, ed. W. McCourt, and M. Minogue, 1–19. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Rusinà, E., L. Dallapellegrina, G. Di Maio, and P. Landoni. 2015. Money management and entrepreneurial training in microfinance: Impact on beneficiaries and institutions. University of Milan Bicocca Department of Economics—management and statistics working paper, 296. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2578304.
- Schevyns, R. 2003. Field work and development studies. A rough guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Simanowitz, A., and K. Knotts (eds.). 2015. The business of doing good. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Siwale, J. 2013. The work experiences of loan officers in microfinance: Is it different for women loan officers? Evidence from Zambia. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management (BAM) Conference 2013, Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar