Skip to main content

Personal value, impersonal subjects


This article explores the critical tensions between the valorisation of “personal” registers in feminist and queer writing since the mid-1980s—including my own—and cultural theories of the “impersonal” subjects of memoir, family history and photography. Starting with Lauren Berlant’s reading of femininity as generic, the article seeks to situate feminist uses of the “I” within what Denise Riley calls the “outward unconscious, which hovers between people”. To articulate subjectivity not in the first person—or not necessarily—the argument follows Carolyn Laubender’s critique of the “plural self “of recent autotheory, pursuing instead the elusive psychic dynamics of historical and cultural formations in the writing of Gail Lewis and Janet Wolff. Looking at the sense of “wrongful narration” from the point of view of both the subject and the object of a story, the affective investment in personalised accounts is read alongside an intellectual affiliation to the impersonality of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. The essay is based on my inaugural online lecture for the Coventry Cultural Theory series in the Centre for Postdigital Cultures at the University of Coventry, 7 March 2022. I am grateful to all the organisers for discussions of the ideas in this talk before, during and after the event; my thanks go to Adrienne Evans, Lindsay Balfour, Gary Hall and Angela McRobbie.

  2. This term, ‘object cathexis’, refers to that mental object which becomes the focus of a kind of a preoccupation charged with affect.

  3. In the North American context, Hortense Spillers names her use of the “I” in her extraordinary essay “Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book” thus: “The use of personal pronouns are offered in the service of a collective function” (1987 p. 65).

  4. Saidiya Hartman’s method of ‘critical fabulation’ (2008) might be related to this method but works very differently in the context of writing about the violence of slavery in the absence of historical archival material about those whose lives were eradicated by its brutalities.


  • Berlant, L. 2000. The Subject of True Feeling: Pain, Privacy and Politics. In Transformations: Thinking Through Feminisms, ed. S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. Mcneil, and B. Skeggs, 33–47. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L., and L. Edelman. 2013. Sex, or the Unbearable. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, B., and C. Douglas. 1991. West Indian Women at War: British Racism in World War II. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, S. (1978) About 5,750 Words. In: The Jewel-Hinged Jaw: Notes on the Language of Science Fiction. Middletown CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2009, pp. 1–15.

  • Guest, T. 2004. My Life in Orange. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, C. 2017. The Impersonal is Political: Adrienne Rich’s Dream of a Common Language, Feminism and the Art of Biopolitics. Cultural Critique 96: 178–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. 2002. Civilising Subjects: Metropole and Colony in the English Imagination 1830–1867. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S. 2008. Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe 26: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubender, C. 2020. Speak for Yourself: Psychoanalysis, Autotheory and the Plural Self. Arizona Quarterly 76 (1): 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. 1985 From deepest Kilburn. In Truth Dare Promise: Girls Growing Up in the Fifties Liz Heron (ed.) London: Virago. pp 213-236

  • Lewis, G. 2009. Birthing Racial Difference: Conversations with My Mother and Others. Studies in the Maternal. 1 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A. 1995. Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., and Spence Jo. 1985. New Portraits for Old: The Use of the Camera in Therapy. Feminist Review 19: 66–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. 2015. The Argonauts. Minneapolis: Graywolf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radstone, S. 2000. Memory and Methodology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. 2005. Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. and H.G. Gavin (2020) In Conversation with Jordy Rosenberg: (last accessed 1 Feb 2023).

  • Sherman, C. 1991. Cindy Sherman 1991, exhibition catalogue, Basel, Kunsthalle, London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.

  • Spillers, H. 1987. Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book. Diacritics 17 (2): 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. 1994. Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. 2015. A Certain Modesty; or, the Ethics of Grey. In Porous Boundaries: Art and Essays, ed. C. Reade and D. Corbett, 167–184. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. 2018. On Being the Good-Enough Reader of Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts. Angelaki 23 (1): 204–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, C. 1986. Landscape for a Good Woman: A Story of Two Women. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. 1986. Video Replay: Families, Films and Fantasy. In Formations of Fantasy, ed. V. Burgin, J. Donald, and C. Kaplan, 167–199. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. 2008. The Aesthetics of Uncertainty. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. 2017. Austerity Baby. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackie Stacey.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stacey, J. Personal value, impersonal subjects. Subjectivity 30, 113–129 (2023).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: