Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Affect, practice and contingency: critical discursive psychology and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Subjectivity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article intersperses Sedgwick’s analysis of paranoid theory and critical discursive psychology, focusing in particular on tools for researching affect and emotion. It is suggested that there are some surprising convergences between Sedgwick’s conclusions about reparative ways of analysing and the emphases in critical discursive psychology. Both stress contingency and craft, the uncertain trajectories of discourses, and what Sedgwick describes as ‘the middle ranges of agency’. Key differences lie in the theory of affect adopted. Critical discursive psychology remains more committed to analyses of the ideological. A further aim of this article is to illustrate the main concerns of discursive research on affective practice. To this end, an extract from a focus group exchange concerning women’s friendships and the experience of being rejected by a friend is explored, highlighting the patterning of everyday meaning making imbued with emotion, strategic identity work, and the ways in which participants mobilise psy techniques and vocabularies to hopeful ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2004. Affective economies. Social Text 22 (279): 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, K., and A. Hitchmough. 2014. Experiencing affect through site-specific dance. Emotion, Space and Society 12 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. 2008. The female complaint: The unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture. Durham, NY: Duke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. 2011. Affect, performance and queer subjectivities. Cultural Studies 25 (2): 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., et al. 2008. Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. 2013. Habit and affect: Revitalizing a forgotten history. Body and Society 19 (2–3): 186–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. 2001. Hearing voices: Embodiment and experience. London: Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., and C. Venn. 2010. Affect. Body & Society 16 (1): 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L., and V. Walkerdine. 2001. Mass hysteria: Critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Stenner, P. 2009. Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. 2014. Emotions and social relations. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P.T. 2008. The affective turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P.T. 2009. The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromby, J. 2015. Feeling bodies: Embodying psychology. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich, A. 2012. Depression: A public feeling. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A.S., and A. Kanai. 2018. From “can-do” girls to insecure and angry: Affective dissonances in young women’s post-recessional media. Feminist Media Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1546206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N. 2001. Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, eds. M. Wetherall, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 189–228. Milton Keynes.

  • Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and cognition. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J., 1992. Discursive psychology. London, Newbruy Park, Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everts, J., and L. Wagner. 2012. Guest editorial: Practising emotions. Emotion, Space and Society 5: 174–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facundo, A.C. 2016. Oscillations of literary theory: The paranoid imperative and queer reparative. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlerowicz, M. 2012. Affect theory dossier: An introduction. Qui Parle 20 (2): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L.-M. 2016. Beats, flesh, and grain: sonic tactility and affect in electronic dance music. Sound Studies 1 (1): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2015.1079072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. 2008. Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity 25 (1): 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., and A. Kanai. 2018. Mediating neoliberal capitalism: Affect, subjectivity and inequality. Journal of Communication 68 (2): 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. 2005. Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies 19 (5): 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, J., et al. 1984. Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. 2009. Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, T. 2010. ‘What kind of mum are you at the moment?’ Supernanny and the psychologising of classed embodiment. Subjectivity 3 (2): 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. 2015. Sexuality: A psychosocial manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. 1946. Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 27: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, B.T., and S. Carsten. 2015. Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect, eds. B.T. Knudsen and S. Carsten. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Laurier, E., and C. Philo. 2006. Possible geographies: A passing encounter in a café. Area 38 (4): 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37 (3): 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1086/659353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, R.J. 2017. Beside-the-mind: An unsettling, reparative reading of paranoia. Subjectivity 10 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0015-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. 2017. Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity 10 (1): 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, H. 2014. Truth and consequences: On paranoid reading and reparative reading. Criticism 41 (9): 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, M. 2018a. Critical social psychology and interdisciplinary studies of personal life: Greater than the sum of its parts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13 (1): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, M. 2018b. Reason, season or life? Heterorelationality and the limits of intimacy between women friends. Sociological Research Online. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418816334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, M. 2019. Significant others? Friendships between women and neoliberal relational life (Doctoral Thesis). Auckland: University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinussen, M., M. Wetherell, and V. Braun. in press. Just being and being bad: Female friendship as a refuge in neoliberal times. Feminism & Psychology.

  • Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movements, affect, sensation. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, D.P. 2008. Geographies for moving bodies: Thinking, dancing, spaces. Geography Compass 2 (6): 1822–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J., and K. Wright. 2009. The talking cure in everyday life: Gender, generations and friendship. Sociology 43 (1): 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508099101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, J.E. 2006. Feeling brown, feeling down: Latina affect, the performativity of race, and the depressive position. Signs 31 (3): 675–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. 1999. Critical psychology: Critical links. Annual Review of Crticial Psychology 1: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S. 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. 2012. Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 16 (2): 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, W. 2009. Historical research on the self and emotions. Emotion Review 1 (4): 302–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, W. 2001. The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. 1970. Freud and philosophy; an essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1996. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1999. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self, 2nd edn. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, M. 2012. Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory 51: 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K. 1996. An introduction: Queerer than fiction. Studies in the Novel 28 (3): 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K. 2007. Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. South Atlantic Quarterly 106 (3): 625–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K. 1997. Paranoid reading and reparative reading; or, you’re so paranoid, you probably think this introduction is about you. In Novel Gazing: Queer readings in fiction, ed. E.K. Sedgwick, 1–37. Durham, NY and London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K. 2003. Touching feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, E.K., and A. Frank. 1995. Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry 21 (2): 496–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahani, N. 2012. Queer retrosexualities: The Politics of reparative return. Lanham, MD: Lehigh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, E. 2008. “You make me feel like a woman”: Therapeutic cultures and the contagion of femininity. Gender, Work and Organization 15 (1): 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. 2015. Discursive and psychosocial? Theorising a complex contemporary subject. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (1): 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. 2007. Children, gender and videogames: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. 2010. Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body and Society 16 (1): 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. 1990. Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., and H. Lucey. 1989. Democracy in the kitchen. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9 (3): 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2006. Formulating selves: Social psychology and the study of identity. Social Psychological Review 8 (2): 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2007. A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2008. Subjectivity or psycho-discursive practices? Investigating complex intersectional identities. Subjectivity 22 (2008): 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2013. Affect and discourse—What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity 6 (4): 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. 2015. Trends in the turn to affect: A Social psychological critique. Body & Society. http://bod.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/03/27/1357034X14539020.abstract.

  • Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1992. Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., et al. 2015. Settling space and covering the nation: Some conceptual considerations in analysing affect and discourse. Emotion, Space and Society 16: 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., L. Smith, and G. Campbell. 2018. Introduction: Affective Heritage Practices. In Emotion, affective practice and the past in the present, eds. M. Wetherell, L. Smith, G. Campbell. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegman, R. 2014. The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative “turn”. Feminist Theory 15 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113513081a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. 2008. Theorizing therapeutic culture: Past influences, future directions. Journal of Sociology 44 (4): 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Auckland, City Campus, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

    Maree Martinussen & Margaret Wetherell

Authors
  1. Maree Martinussen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret Wetherell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maree Martinussen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinussen, M., Wetherell, M. Affect, practice and contingency: critical discursive psychology and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. Subjectivity 12, 101–116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00071-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00071-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation