Abstract
By examining photographic depictions of subjects labeled as ‘intellectually disabled’, this article theorizes how photography performs the ideological function of producing narratives of historical progression. Recurrent representations of, on the one hand, a dark past of state institutionalization and repression and, on the other hand, the present as a time when intellectually disabled people are active, included and happy, function to locate oppression in a bygone era, which effectively obscures how power has transformed rather than disappeared. This relates to how the narrative break between the past exclusion and present inclusion conceals an inherent paradox in the constitution of intellectually disabled subjectivity; at the same time, members of this group are both included by citizenship and classified as lacking the necessary characteristics of the ideal citizen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altermark, Niklas. 2018. Citizenship Inclusion and Intellectual Disability: Biopolitics Post-Institutionalisation. London: Routledge.
Barthes, Roland. 1993. Camera Lucida. London: Vintage.
Barnes, Colin. 1992. Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. Krumlin: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People and Ryburn Publishing Limited.
Bogdan, R., M. Elks, and J.A. Knoll. 2012. Picturing Disability: Beggar, Freak, Citizen, and Other Photographic Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Brown, W. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. 2010. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?. London: Verso.
Carey, A.C. 2009. On the Margins of Citizenship: Intellectual Disability and Civil Rights in Twentieth Century America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Clement, T., and C. Bigby. 2010. Group Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Encouraging Inclusion and Participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Crow, J., L. Crow, and A. Ormston. 1990. Photography and Disability in England. London: The Arts Council.
Drinkwater, C. 2005. Supported Living and the Production of Individuals. In Foucault and the Government of Disability, ed. S. Tremain. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Edenborg, E. 2017. Politics of Visibility and Belonging: From Russia’s “Homosexual Propaganda” Laws to the Ukraine War. London: Routledge.
Elks, M.A. 2005. Visual Indictment: A Contextual Analysis of the Kallikak Family Photographs. Mental Retardation 43 (4): 268–280.
Foucualt, M. 1989. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality. The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. Penguin: Hamondsworth.
Fudge Schormans, A. 2014. ‘Weightless?’: Disrupting Relations of Power In/Through Photographic Imagery of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Disability & Society 29 (5): 699–713.
Garland-Thomson, R. 2001. Seeing the Disabled: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography. In The New Disability History: American Perspectives, ed. Paul K. Longmore and Lauri Umansky. New York: New York University Press.
Garland-Thomson, R. 2002. The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography. In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, ed. Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland- Thomson. New York: Modern Language Association.
Grunewald, K. 2008. Från idiot till medborgare (’From Idiot to Citizen’). Stockholm: Gothia Förlag.
Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_ OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Haritaworn, J. 2015. Queer Lovers and Hateful Others: Regenerating Violent Times and Places. London: Pluto Press.
Inclusion International. 2014. Independent but not Alone: A Global Report on the Right to Decide. London: Inclusion International.
Lidchi, H. 1997. The Poetics and the Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Sage.
Pedwell, C. 2017. Mediated Habits: Images, Networked Affect and Social Change. Subjectivity 10: 147–169.
Scott, J.W. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shildrick, M. 1999. This Body Which is Not One: Dealing with Differences. Body & Society 5 (2–3): 77–92.
Shildrick, M., and D.L. Steinberg. 2015. Estranged Bodies: Shifting Paradigms and the Biomedical Imaginary. Body & Society 21 (3): 3–19.
Siebers, T. 2010. Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Sontag, S. (2002) Looking at War: Photography’s View of Devastation and Death. The New Yorker, 9 December 2002.
Spivak, G.C. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Towards a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stiker, H.-J. 1999. A History of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Walmsley, J. 2005. Institutionalization: A Historical Perspective. In Deinstitutionalization and People with Intellectual Disabilities, ed. Kelley Johnson and Rannveig Traustadóttir. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Wehmeyer, M.L. 2013. The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, and Public Perception. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altermark, N., Edenborg, E. Visualizing the included subject: photography, progress narratives and intellectual disability. Subjectivity 11, 287–302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0057-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0057-y