Subjectivity

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 411–426 | Cite as

Carer narratives of fatigue and endurance in Japan and England

Original Article

Abstract

Caring for an elderly person often requires constant attention, physically challenging tasks, and emotional strain, all of which accumulate over periods and manifest as fatigue. Despite the prevalence of descriptions of fatigue in carer narratives, and the massive clinical literature on ‘carer burden’ and ‘exhaustion’, the significance of fatigue as a component of care rather than a mere by-product has not been fully explored. Drawing on Levinas’ phenomenological theory of fatigue I argue that experiences of fatigue shape carer subjectivities as both vulnerable and enduring, qualities that are essential for inaugurating new ways of being towards and taking ethical responsibility for the cared-for. At the same time, fatigue can become tragic if not supported by social and cultural narratives that recognize it and give it value.

Keywords

Aged care Fatigue Endurance Japan England 

References

  1. Becker, G. 1997. Disrupted Lives: How People Create Meaning in a Chaotic World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, P. 2008. EL CAMPO: Faciality and Structural Violence in Farm Labor Camps. Cultural Anthropology 23 (4): 589–629. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00020.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman, Lisa, John Cromby, Derek Hook, Dimitris Papadopoulos, and Valerie Walkerdine. 2008. Creating Subjectivities. Subjectivity 22 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1057/sub.2008.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borneman, J. 1997. Caring and Being Cared for: Displacing Marriage, Kinship, Gender and Sexuality. International Social Science Journal 49 (154): 573–584. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00046.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briggs, C.L. 2014. Dear Dr. Freud. Cultural Anthropology 29 (2): 312–343. doi:10.14506/ca29.2.08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brijnath, B. 2014. Unforgotten: Love and the Culture of Dementia Care in India. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  7. Buch, E.D. 2015. Anthropology of Aging and Care. Annual Review of Anthropology 44 (1): 277–293. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, L. 1998. No Aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the Bad Family, and Other Modern Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danely, J. 2016. Affect, Infrastructure and Vulnerability: Making and breaking Japanese eldercare. Medicine Anthropology Theory 3 (2): 198–222.Google Scholar
  11. Day, J.R., and R.A. Anderson. 2011. Compassion Fatigue: An Application of the Concept to Informal Caregivers of Family Members with Dementia. Nursing Research and Practice. doi:10.1155/2011/408024. (Article ID 408024).Google Scholar
  12. Frank, A.W. 1997. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujiwara, K. 2012. Rethinking Successful Aging from the Perspective of an Aging Japanese Statue of Jizō with Replaceable Heads. Anthropology & Aging 33 (3): 104–111.Google Scholar
  14. Gaines, A.D. 1992. Medical/Psychiatric Knowledge in France and the United States: Culture and Sickness in History and Biology. In Ethnopsychiatry: The Cultural Construction of Professional and Folk Psychiatries, ed. Atwood D. Gaines, 171–202. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grøn, L. 2016. Old Age and Vulnerability between First, Second and Third Person Perspectives. Ethnographic Explorations of Aging in Contemporary Denmark. Journal of Aging Studies 39: 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han, C. 2012. Life in Debt: Times of Care and Violence in Neoliberal Chile. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, P. 2008. Corporeal Remains: Vulnerability, Proximity, and Living on after the End of the World. Environment and Planning A 40 (2): 423–445. doi:10.1068/a391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hromadžić, A. 2015. ‘Where Were They until now?’ Aging, Care and Abandonment in a Bosnian Town. Etnološka Tribina 45 (38): 3–57. doi:10.15378/1848-9540.2015.38.01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirmayer, L.J. 1994. A Symposium on Neurasthenia and Fatigue Syndromes. Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review 31: 99–100. doi:10.1177/136346159403100201.
  20. Kirmayer, L.J. 2000. Broken Narratives: Clinical Encounters and the Poetics of Illness Experience. In Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing, ed. C. Mattingly, and L. Garro, 153–180. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kittay, E.F. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kleinman, A. 2014. How We Endure. The Lancet 383 (9912): 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamb, S. 2000. White Saris and Sweet Mangoes Aging, Gender, and Body in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levinas, E. (1978 [1948]) Existence and Existents. (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Mattingly, Cheryl. 2010. The Paradox of Hope: Journeys Through a Clinical Borderland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mattingly, Cheryl. 2014. Moral Laboratories: Family Peril and the Struggle for a Good Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mol, A., I. Moser, and A.J. Pols. 2010. Care: Putting Practice into Theory. In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, ed. A. Mol, I. Moser, and J. Pols, 7–26. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. NHK. 2016. I Have Killed a Family Member—Care Murder: Confessions of those Involved [Watshi ha kazoku wo koroshita– kaigo satsujin- tojisha kokuhaku].Google Scholar
  29. Noddings, N. 2003. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Parish, S.M. 2008. Subjectivity and Suffering in American Culture: Possible Selves. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Povinelli, E.A. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rapport, N. 2015. Anthropology through Levinas: Knowing the Uniqueness of Ego and the Mystery of Otherness. Current Anthropology 56 (2): 256–276. doi:10.1086/680433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross, F. 2009. Raw Life, New Hope: Decency, Housing and Everyday Life in a Post-Apartheid Community. Claremont, South Africa: UCT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sakellariou, D. 2015. Towards the Construction of a Nicer Life: Subjectivity and the Logic of Choice. Anthropology in Action 22 (1): 46–53.Google Scholar
  35. Stevenson, L. 2014. Life Beside Itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Topolski, A. 2014. Relationality as a ‘Foundation’ for Human Rights: Exploring the Paradox with Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas. Theoria and Praxis: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Thought 2 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  37. Tronto, J.C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Zarit, S.H., K.E. Reever, and J. Bach-Peterson. 1980. Relatives of the Impaired Elderly: Correlates of Feelings of Burden. The Gerontologist 20 (6): 649–655. doi:10.1093/geront/20.6.649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zahavi, D., and P. Rochat. 2015. Empathy ≠ Sharing: Perspectives from Phenomenology and Developmental Psychology. Consciousness and Cognition 36 (November): 543–553. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zigon, Jarrett. 2007. Moral Breakdown and the Ethical Demand A Theoretical Framework for an Anthropology of Moralities. Anthropological Theory 7 (2): 131–150. doi:10.1177/1463499607077295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations