Advertisement

Subjectivity

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 343–362 | Cite as

Pain as semiosomatic force: The disarticulation and rearticulation of subjectivity

  • Steve LaroccoEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Scarry’s (The Body in Pain: the Making and Unmaking of the World, Oxford, New York, 1985) broke crucial ground in examining the antagonisms between pain, embodiment and language, and the isolating effects of pain as experience. This paper submits Scarry’s claim that extreme pain destroys language, evades mediation, and isolates the subject to critical scrutiny, arguing instead that pain is a semiosomatic force, a form of feeling generated by imperative information about embodiment (real or imaginary) that works to disarticulate and move the subject and the social environment. Pain is not predominantly antagonistic to language; rather, pain insists on signifying, with language being only one of its performative media. What pain resists is representation, not the informational force exerted through language and other semiotic forms. Rather than unmaking language, pain disarticulates and rearticulates subjectivity, refashioning interrelations between the body, subjectivity, others, and culture in ongoing processes of largely aversive impingement, embroiling subjectivity with the imperative directives of embodied vulnerability.

Keywords

pain performativity semiotics subjectivity embodiment 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Améry, J. (1964/1998) At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities. S. and S. P. Rosenfeld (trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J.L. (1962/1975) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bending, L. (2006) Approximation, suggestion, and analogy: Translating pain into language. The Yearbook of English Studies 36(1): 131–137.Google Scholar
  5. Burkitt, I. (2014) Emotions and Social Relations. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cromby, J. (2015) Feeling Bodies: Embodying Psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Saussure, F. (1916/1998) Course in General Linguistics. R. Harris (trans.). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1974/1998) Of Grammatology. G.C. Spivak (trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fassin, D. and Rechtman, R. (2009) The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood. R. Gomme (trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1997) Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 19751976. D. Macey (trans.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1990/1920) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. J. Strachey (trans.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Gallese, V. (2001) The “shared manifold” hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5–7): 33–50.Google Scholar
  13. Gallese, V. (2007) Intentional attunement: Mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 55(1): 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goubert, L., Craig, K.D., Vervoort T., Morley, S., Sullivan M. J.L., de Williams A.C., Cano, A. and Crombez, G. (2005) Facing others in pain: The effects of empathy. Pain 118: 285–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harpham, G.G. (2001) Elaine scarry and the dream of pain. Salmagundi 130/131: 202–234.Google Scholar
  16. Hochschild, A.R. (1979) Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iacoboni, M. (2009) Mirroring People: The Science of Empathy and How We Connect with Others. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, P.L., Meltzoff, A.N. and Decety, J. (2005) How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. NeuroImage 24(3): 771–779. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, A. and Malabou, C. (2013). Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, T. (2002) Reversing the shame and gendering the memory. Signs 28(1): 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keysers, C. (2011) The Empathic Brain: How the Discovery of Mirror Neurons Changes our Understanding of Human Nature. Amsterdam: Social Brain Press.Google Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/2011) Phenomenology of Perception. C. Smith (trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Milton, J. (1667/1998) Paradise Lost. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Morrison, I., Lloyd, D., di Pellegrino, G. and Roberts, N. (2004) Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue? Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 4(2): 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pheifer, J.H. and Dapretto, M. (2011) “Mirror, mirror in my mind”: Empathy, interpersonal competence and the mirror neuron system. In: J. Decety and W. Ickes (eds.) The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
  26. Scarry, E. (1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009) The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  28. Solms, M. and O. Turnbull. (2002) The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Subjective Experience. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wailoo, K. (2014) Pain: A Political History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wall, P. (2000) Pain: The Science of Suffering. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wilkinson, I. (2005) Pain: A Sociological Introduction. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, R. (2005) Culture and Materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Connecticut State UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations