Abstract
The 2012 English Health and Social Care Act marked a fundamental reform of statutory healthcare in England in ways which elevated the interests of the government over the interests of patients or the professions, and which undermined traditional alliances between professions and patients. Drawing on a countervailing powers framework we present a thematic analysis of parliamentary papers, press releases and other publicly available materials produced across the reform process by four key actors in the healthcare field—the government, medical profession, patients and ‘for profit’ providers. This analysis explores how the pursuit of sectional interests by these actors may have acted to constrain potential alliances and ultimately contributed to the enactment of the legislation by default. This conclusion has relevance for other Beveridge model healthcare systems undergoing health and social care reform under the auspices of austerity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Voluntary sector refers to a range of largely non-profit making community interest companies, charities and other similar organisations involved in the provision of statutory and non-statutory health and social care services.
References
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. 2011. Academy statement to NHS Health & Social Care bill 2011. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, published February 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20160322200233/http://www.aomrc.org.uk/doc_download/9333-academy-statement-to-nhs-health-social-care-bill-2011. Accessed 6 November, 2018. Authors.
Beach, W. 2018. “Tiny Tiny Little Nothings”: Minimization and reassurance in the face of cancer. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536945.
Black, N. 2010. ‘Liberating the NHS’: Another attempt to implement market forces in English Health Care. New England Journal of Medicine 363 (12): 1103–1105.
British Medical Association. 2011. BMA says Health and Social Care bill is a ‘massive gamble’. British Medical Association, published 19 January, 2011. http://web2.bma.org.uk/pressrel.nsf/wall/D82933DF0A9ECC2A8025781D0055E843?OpenDocument. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
British Medical Association. 2011a. Health and Social Care Bill continues to cause chaos in the NHS, British Medical Association, published 7 December, 2011. http://web.bma.org.uk/pressrel.nsf/wall/CC624BB4ED82C3618025795F00342469?OpenDocument. Accessed 5 January, 2017.
British Medical Association. 2011b. Response to the NHS future forum recommendations on the NHS health reforms. British Medical Association Web site. Published June 13, 2011. Accessed January 5, 2018.
Davies, S.C., E. Winpenny, S. Ball, T. Fowler, J. Rubin, and E. Nolte. 2014. For debate: A new wave in public health improvement. Lancet 384: 1889–1895.
Davis, J., and R. Tallis (eds.). 2013. NHS SOS: How the NHS was betrayed—and how we can save it. London: OneWorld Publications.
Department of Health. 2010. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: Stationery Office.
Department of Health. 2011. Patient-centred NHS a step closer to reality: Health and Social Care bill published. Department of Health, published 19 January, 2011. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Pressreleases/DH_123618. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Exworthy, M., R. Mannion, and M. Powell (eds.). 2016. Dismantling the NHS: Evaluating the impact of health reforms. Bristol: Policy Press.
Field, S. 2011. Proposed changes to the NHS: Summary report from the NHS future forum. London: Stationery Office.
Hartley, H. 2002. The system of alignments challenging physician professional dominance: An elaborated theory of countervailing powers. Sociology of Health & Illness 24 (2): 178–207.
Kmietowicz, Z. 2012. Nearly 2000 amendments are not enough to save health bull, says BMA. British Medical Journal 344: e935.
NHS Confederation. 2011. Liberating the NHS: what might happen? National Health Service Confederation, published January 2011. http://www.nhsconfed.org/~/media/Confederation/Files/public%20access/Implications%20for%20policy-makers.pdf. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Light, D. 1988. Toward a new sociology of medical education. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 29: 307–322.
Light, D. 1991a. Observations on the NHS reforms: an American perspective. British Medical Journal 303: 568–570.
Light, D. 1991b. Professionalism as a countervailing power. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 16 (3): 499–506.
Light, D. 1997. From managed competition to managed cooperation: Theory and lessons from the British experience. Milbank Quarterly 75: 297–341.
Light, D. 1998. Is NHS purchasing serious? An American perspective. British Medical Journal 316: 217–220.
Light, D. 2000. The sociological character of health-care markets. In Handbook of social studies in health and medicine, ed. G. Albrecht, R. Fitzpatrick, and S. Scrimshaw, 394–408. London: Sage.
Light, D. 2010. Health-care professions, markets and countervailing powers. In Handbook of medical sociology, ed. C. Bird, P. Conrad, A. Fremont, and S. Timmermans, 270–289. Tennessee, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Light, D. 2011. Historical and comparative reflections on the U.S. National Health Insurance reforms. Social Science and Medicine 72: 129–132.
Light, D. 2014. Countervailing powers. In The Wiley Blackwell encyclopaedia of health, illness, behaviour, and society, ed. W. Cockerham, R. Dingwall, and S. Quah, 325–332. London: Wiley.
Long, P., and K. McLean. 2011. Clinical advice and leadership: a report from the NHS future forum. London: Department of Health.
Mohan, J. 2009. Visions of privatisation: new labour and the reconstruction of the NHS. In The new sociology of the health service, ed. J. Gabe and M. Calnan, 79–98. Oxon: Routledge.
National Health Executive. 2012. Competition can improve NHS–OHE. National Health Executive, published 1 February, 2012. http://www.nationalhealthexecutive.com/Health-Care-News/competition-can-improve-nhs-ohe. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Patients Association. 2011. Memorandum submitted by Patients Association to Public Bill Committee Debate. House of Commons, published 16 February 16, 2011. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmpublic/health/memo/m39.htm. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Patients Association. 2012. Response to the return of the health and social care bill to the House of Lords. Patients Association, published 8 February, 2012. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmpublic/health/110215/am/110215s01.htm. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Pollock, A., and D. Price. 2011. How the secretary of state for health proposes to abolish the NHS in England. British Medical Journal 342: d1695.
Powell, M., and M. Hewitt. 1998. The end of the welfare state? Social Policy and Administration 32 (1): 1–13.
Royal College of General Practitioners. 2011. RCGP responds to the Health and Social Care bill. Royal College of General Practitioners, published 19 January, 2011. http://www.primarycarereports.co.uk/royal_college_of_general_practitioners_responds_to_the_health_and_social_care_bill.html. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Royal College of General Practitioners. 2011a. Written evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners (PH 184), HC 1048-III Health Committee. House of Commons, published 28 November, 2011. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhealth/1048/1048vw175.htm. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Royal College of General Practitioners. 2012. RCGP calls for Prime Minister to withdraw Health bill. Health Care Leaders News, published 4 February 2012. http://www.healthcareleadernews.com/rcgp-calls-for-the-withdrawal-of-the-health-bill/. http://www.aisma.org.uk/rcgp-calls-for-withdrawal-of-health-bill/. Accessed 6 November, 2018.
Roland, M., and R. Rosen. 2011. English NHS embarks on controversial and risky market-style reforms in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 364 (14): 1360–1366.
Salter, B. 2004. The new politics of medicine. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Scheid, T. 2008. Competing institutional demands: A framework for understanding mental health policy. Social Theory and Health 6: 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2008.12.
Speed, E., and J. Gabe. 2013. The health and social care act for England 2012: The extension of ‘new professionalism’. Critical Social Policy 33 (3): 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018313479010.
Timmermans, S., and E. Kolker. 2004. Evidence-based medicine and the reconfiguration of medical knowledge. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 45: 177–193.
Vinson, A.H. 2016. ‘Constrained collaboration’: Patient empowerment discourse as resource for countervailing power. Sociology of Health & Illness 38: 1364–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Speed, E., Gabe, J. The reform of the English National Health Service: professional dominance, countervailing powers and the buyers’ revolt. Soc Theory Health 18, 33–49 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00116-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00116-x